Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News and analysis

Nearly a quarter of Canadians head online for health info

Shelley Martin
CMAJ November 14, 2000 163 (10) 1328-1328-a;
Shelley Martin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

According to a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) survey, 22% of adult Canadians used the Internet to find health information during the past year and 79% believed the quality of that information needs to be improved.

BC residents were the most likely to have looked for online health information (28%), followed closely by residents of Ontario and Alberta. Quebecers were least likely (14%).

Although 96% of those who searched indicated that it is easy to find information and it tended to be presented in a manner that was easily understood, 79% felt that it is hard to know which information can be trusted.

According to the survey, which was conducted in the spring of 2000, Canadians aged 65 and over are least likely to have used the Internet in the past year (7%, compared with 72% of those aged 15–24 and 56% of those aged 25–44). However, seniors who are connected are more likely to seek health information than younger Canadians (55%, versus 31% for those aged 15–24 and 51% for those aged 25–44). Women who use the Internet are more likely than men to search for health information (47% versus 36%).

According to the PWC study, 33% of Canadians who obtained medical information on the Internet discussed this material with their doctors. Results from the CMA's 2000 Physician Resource Questionnaire (PRQ) indicate that 84% of doctors have had patients present them with medical information obtained on the Internet, and 47% of those doctors reviewed such information always or often. The PRQ indicated that only 32% of doctors reviewing Internet-based health information presented by patients found the material to be of good or very good quality.

The exchange of Internet-based health information sometimes travels in the other direction. The PRQ found that 36% of doctors give information found online to patients; 51% of online doctors refer patients to health sites, at least occasionally. Doctors who are not personally online appear to be familiar with some health-related Web sites: 26% of them have referred patients, at least occasionally, to medical sites. —

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 163, Issue 10
14 Nov 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nearly a quarter of Canadians head online for health info
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Nearly a quarter of Canadians head online for health info
Shelley Martin
CMAJ Nov 2000, 163 (10) 1328-1328-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Nearly a quarter of Canadians head online for health info
Shelley Martin
CMAJ Nov 2000, 163 (10) 1328-1328-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Will Canada follow US lead on RU 486?
  • Gene mutation may explain multiple-birth pregnancies
  • Greening of health care goal of new coalition
Show more News and Analysis

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire