Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News and analysis

Will Canada follow US lead on RU 486?

Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ January 09, 2001 164 (1) 82;
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

After 17 years of debate, mifepristone (RU 486), the controversial pill that induces early abortion, is for sale in the US. The drug's Canadian proponents hope this country will soon follow suit.

“It's amazing that they got it through,” says Bonnie Johnson, executive director of the Planned Parenthood Federation of Canada (www.ppfc.ca/). “It means women now have a choice. The big thing for us is it takes [abortion] off the streets — it becomes a private thing between a woman and her doctor.”

Health Canada has agreed to fast-track approval of the drug, but “[Canada's] problem isn't approval,” says Johnson, “it's getting a manufacturer, someone who is willing to take the risk of marketing and promoting it. They'll have to wear armour.”

Dr. André Lalonde, executive vice-president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), agrees. “We're never going to get a company to bring it forward for approval,” he says. The program currently considers only those drugs presented by manufacturers. Lalonde says the key is to get the program to change and accept an application from another group as a “public health measure.”

That's exactly what happened in the US. The Population Council holds the US patent for mifepristone, while the manufacturer is Danco Laboratories.

Mifepristone, a progesterone blocker, can be used safely to induce abortion in women who are up to 8 weeks' pregnant. After confirming pregnancy and determining dates, mifepristone is prescribed. Two days later the woman takes misoprostol (unless the physician confirms that the pregnancy has terminated); this drug causes uterine contractions. In the US, the bill for the drugs, physicians' charges, counselling and other fees totals about $270. The main advantages of RU 486 is that it allows earlier, nonsurgical abortions.

Mifepristone, which was first approved for use in France in 1988, has been used by 620 000 women in Europe. The death rate among women using the pill is 1 per 200 000, almost the same as the rate for surgical abortions.

Canadian women may try to buy the drug in the US, says Dr. Ken Milne of the SOGC. He says some of his patients have bought combination birth control pills in the US. However, he warns that if Canadian women manage to get RU 486 across the border it is “essential that they confide in their physicians. To withhold may well jeopardize their well-being.”

In the US, 87% of counties don't have an abortion provider and studies indicate that the number of doctors providing abortions decreased by 14% between 1992 and 1996. US approval of RU 486 came with some restrictions: the drug must be administered by or under the control of a physician. This means that other health professionals, such as nurse practitioners, can administer the drug. The professional has to know how to date conception, rule out a tubal pregnancy and be able to perform or to arrange a surgical abortion if one is needed. Instead of being sold in pharmacies, the drug will be ordered directly from the manufacturer by physicians.

Detailed patient information is available and a patient agreement, which stipulates that the woman must return for a follow-up appointment, has to be signed before the drug can be administered. Physicians must also sign a form indicating that they understand the method.

The SOGC passed a resolution in 1992 supporting the “legal availability” of antiprogesterone steroids such as mifepristone in order to give “Canadian women access to treatment of proven efficacy.” Lalonde says withholding approval is an “insult to women — they're being treated like babies, being refused access to this and that when it comes to their health.”

Not everyone is as enthusiastic. Mary Ellen Douglas, national organizer for Canada's Campaign Life Coalition (www.lifesite.net), told CMAJ: “The result of taking this pill is a dead baby, and that's certainly not a drug we need here.” —

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 164, Issue 1
9 Jan 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Newsletter (91-98)

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Will Canada follow US lead on RU 486?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Will Canada follow US lead on RU 486?
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Jan 2001, 164 (1) 82;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Will Canada follow US lead on RU 486?
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Jan 2001, 164 (1) 82;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Popularity of "abortion pill" grows in US
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Number of medical school applicants drops on both sides of border
  • Gene mutation may explain multiple-birth pregnancies
Show more News and Analysis

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire