Research
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada
Robyn Tamblyn, Nadyne Girard, Christina J. Qian and James Hanley
CMAJ April 23, 2018 190 (16) E489-E499; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170901
Robyn Tamblyn
Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (Tamblyn), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ont.; Departments of Medicine (Tamblyn) and Epidemiology, and Biostatistics (Girard, Qian, Hanley), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
PhDNadyne Girard
Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (Tamblyn), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ont.; Departments of Medicine (Tamblyn) and Epidemiology, and Biostatistics (Girard, Qian, Hanley), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
MScChristina J. Qian
Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (Tamblyn), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ont.; Departments of Medicine (Tamblyn) and Epidemiology, and Biostatistics (Girard, Qian, Hanley), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
MScJames Hanley
Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (Tamblyn), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ont.; Departments of Medicine (Tamblyn) and Epidemiology, and Biostatistics (Girard, Qian, Hanley), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
PhD
Submit a Response to This Article
Jump to comment:
No Responses have been published for this article.
In this issue
Article tools
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada
Robyn Tamblyn, Nadyne Girard, Christina J. Qian, James Hanley
CMAJ Apr 2018, 190 (16) E489-E499; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170901
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Gender disparity among psychiatry departments awarded Canadian Institutes of Health Research grants: a retrospective study
- A bibliometric analysis of gender in microbiology collaborations
- Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness
- Characteristics of Heart Failure Trials Associated With Under-Representation of Women as Lead Authors
- Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports
- Proportion of female recipients of resident-selected awards across Canada from 2000 to 2018: a retrospective observational study
- Mentoring for postdoctoral researchers in rheumatology: the Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET) post-doc mentoring programme
- Dissecting disparity: improvements towards gender parity in leadership and on the podium within the Canadian Orthopaedic Association
- Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions
- Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review
- Does Gender Bias Still Affect Women in Science?
- The foundation and consequences of gender bias in grant peer review processes