Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency

Kirsten Patrick
CMAJ August 05, 2014 186 (11) 811; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140834
Kirsten Patrick
Kirsten Patrick is Deputy Editor,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Re:Not all patients are the same
    prasad V aduvala
    Posted on: 08 September 2014
  • Transparency should become the standard of care
    Israel Amirav
    Posted on: 02 September 2014
  • Neither transparency nor improved care
    Lia Rech
    Posted on: 08 August 2014
  • Not all patients are the same
    Sheri G. McMann
    Posted on: 08 August 2014
  • Posted on: (8 September 2014)
    Re:Not all patients are the same
    • prasad V aduvala, pediatrician/psychotherapist
    • Other Contributors:

    One of the most striking information in the article is that the author has been in Canada for a year,and she all ready is Deputy director of CMAJ? Unfortunately, her treatment of medical records as simmilar to Canadian Tire accounts is not surprising.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Posted on: (2 September 2014)
    Transparency should become the standard of care
    • Israel Amirav, Associate Professor

    Dr. Patrick is to be applauded for her enlightening editorial regarding patients and their medical records. The author suggests in her title that "It is time to embrace transparency". In a time when more than 70% of Canadian primary care practices are using electronic medical records (EMR's), the author wonders "Is sharing the entirety of the electronic medical record with a patient not the obvious next step in the laud...

    Show More

    Dr. Patrick is to be applauded for her enlightening editorial regarding patients and their medical records. The author suggests in her title that "It is time to embrace transparency". In a time when more than 70% of Canadian primary care practices are using electronic medical records (EMR's), the author wonders "Is sharing the entirety of the electronic medical record with a patient not the obvious next step in the laudable movement toward shared decision-making and patient-physician collaboration, an ideology that is well established in Canadian health care?".

    I could not agree more with this view. As is Dr. Patrick, I too am a newcomer to Canada. In Israel (where I came from) EMR's have been used for over 15 years with enormous success and compliance from all parties. Direct, view only, web access to their own EMR is now an integral part of a patient's rights and is available at the click of a button. Lab results are shared and accessible to patients within minutes of being reported on the net. As pointed out in her article, with judicious application of appropriate security measures such as those employed to protect banking, pension, tax and insurance information, there should be more advantages than disadvantages to the open access of medical information.

    I would like to expand on Dr. Patrick's editorial and suggest that transparency and sharing also extend to the clinic visit summary letter. I am a consultant pediatrician and in my practice in Israel I used the EMR to print two copies of my visit summary notes/letter. These were given to the parent or guardian to take with them, one copy to keep for their records and one for their family physician or pediatrician. I have recently started following this practice in Canada. Although initially this raised some eyebrows, particularly from colleagues who were not accustomed to this degree of transparency, my patients love it. They feel so much more empowered and involved in the clinical decision making process. They leave the appointment armed with a summary of the visit and are able to review the information immediately or later at their convenience when they can fully digest it. These patients are now questioning why other health care providers do not offer the same open access to their medical records. The benefits for me are that I have no more dictations to complete after clinic, I do not have to wait for a transcriptionist to type my letters, and there is no editing required. The consult letter is delivered directly to the referring physician via the returning patient. As a precaution, I do currently send a copy by mail to the family doctor/pediatrician. However, I suspect that as time goes by, this will become unnecessary.

    At first this new degree of transparency was surprising to many of my patients but now they are accustomed to it and like it very much. I believe that they will increasingly demand such transparency from other clinical encounters as well.

    It is indeed time to embrace transparency!

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Posted on: (8 August 2014)
    Neither transparency nor improved care
    • Lia Rech, Edmonton, AB

    In the editorial article "Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency" the author states that "the majority of patients would like to have the right to 'approve' or 'amend' their records."

    Patients should be given the choice of producing their own records and attach consultation reports and take their own notes on the follow-up appointments (or pay a fee should they prefer to receive...

    Show More

    In the editorial article "Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency" the author states that "the majority of patients would like to have the right to 'approve' or 'amend' their records."

    Patients should be given the choice of producing their own records and attach consultation reports and take their own notes on the follow-up appointments (or pay a fee should they prefer to receive a report for each appointment). In this context, I am the consultant and they have the right to search for a provider whose management makes sense to them.

    Medical charts should not contain judgmental but objective notes for clinical reasoning purposes. Comments and alterations of medical notes by the patient will affect clinical decisions and be detrimental to their own care.

    Lia Rech, MD

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Posted on: (8 August 2014)
    Not all patients are the same
    • Sheri G. McMann, CHIM

    Yes, it is time to embrace transparency (long overdue actually)! I've worked in the health care industry since 1982 - mainly in the field of Health Information Management. And mainly in acute care hospitals. I've had the pleasure of meeting many patients over the years who have legitimate, honest, and sincere needs to access their own personal health information. These patients aren't necessarily the younger generation...

    Show More

    Yes, it is time to embrace transparency (long overdue actually)! I've worked in the health care industry since 1982 - mainly in the field of Health Information Management. And mainly in acute care hospitals. I've had the pleasure of meeting many patients over the years who have legitimate, honest, and sincere needs to access their own personal health information. These patients aren't necessarily the younger generation either. They come from all demographics. They are curious, and they have a vested interest in understanding more about their medical conditions - more than the brief 10 minutes their GP can give them in their medical offices. The folks I've had the pleasure of helping are more interested in understanding what their lab values mean (in layman's terms) then what some nurse or doctor said about them in their record. I myself, have a few health conditions (comes with being in my 50's) and I have had to face the hassle of getting access to my own personal health information - my own lab work. The privacy rules (and nonsense) that I have had to endure is so antiquated - that I can only imagine the level of frustration the average patient feels! It's time to change. Not all patients are the same. Some actually understand medical terminology (like me) and all its hundreds of acronyms. And, in closing, I could care less what some nurse or doctor writes about me. I just want the data, the test results, the evidence. I just want simple, easy access (read only is fine) to my own personal health information - when I want it, where I want it, and how I want it. On demand. It's my information. It's about me. So, what's the hold up?

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 11
5 Aug 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency
Kirsten Patrick
CMAJ Aug 2014, 186 (11) 811; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.140834

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency
Kirsten Patrick
CMAJ Aug 2014, 186 (11) 811; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.140834
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
  • Transparency of care
  • Not all patients are the same
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Trouver, tester, « tracer » et isoler énergiquement pour battre la COVID-19
  • Intégration des essais randomisés dans les soins cliniques : comment le Canada peut faire mieux
  • Soins continus et COVID-19 : Qu’une telle tragédie ne se reproduise plus au Canada!
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Shared decision-making (doctor-patient)
    • Patient education
    • Medical ethics

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire