Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Editorial

Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency

Kirsten Patrick
CMAJ August 05, 2014 186 (11) 811; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140834
Kirsten Patrick
Kirsten Patrick is Deputy Editor, CMAJ
MBBCh DA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I don’t have direct access to my medical record, although I could ask to see it under Ontario’s Personal Health Information Protection Act.1 My physician is obliged to let me see my medical record, barring a few specific circumstances, and is required to grant me access to it within 60 days, although in some regions 90 days “is permissible” (really?). For access, I would almost certainly be charged a fee. The situation is similar in other jurisdictions: legal rights with hoops and speed bumps.

Why would I want to view or ask to amend my medical record? After all, it is (currently) pretty thin. I’ve lived in Canada for only a year, and I’ve visited my family doctor only twice. Well, that’s entirely the point. I’d like to make sure that all the information that is relevant is there. Many patients move cities, provinces or countries, and gather a patchy medical record over a lifetime. Physicians have a duty to ensure that medical records are accurate and complete. Although physicians may interpret this as extending only to their own notes, a medical record with substantial gaps may result in a patient receiving suboptimal care, which is not in the best interest of either the patient or the physician. There are other arguments for allowing patients easy access to their medical records, not the least of which is that patients Really Like It.

Patient access to health records has been piloted successfully, and apparently without system collapse, both in secondary care services and primary care practices. One of the largest of these studies2 trialled open notes across three primary care practices in three US states for a year. Afterward, 99% of patients wanted open notes to continue beyond the experiment, and no doctor chose to stop. That’s telling. The vast majority of patients surveyed across studies reported feeling more in control of their care and more likely to adhere to medication when they could access their notes. The burden on physicians appeared to be minimal, and no adverse events were reported.

There are important concerns. Security is always a concern, but patient identification details for medical records could be protected just as well as banking, pension, tax and insurance details are, by using the same mechanisms. A minority of patients find reading their medical notes confusing or offensive. This speaks to the need for physicians to be respectful in written notes and to take the time to explain the language they use to patients. Some patients admit to sharing their record with another person. As in other domains, we must educate patients about what information is appropriate to share.

Interestingly, the majority of patients would like to have the right to “approve” or “amend” their records. Physicians strongly oppose this idea; they know that the legal obligation to maintain an accurate medical record and not to “doctor” it, rests with the physician. Allowing patients the ability to “leave a comment” or change address details would be feasible, but allowing patients unfettered access to records is not feasible, given the illegality of erasing or falsifying a part of the medical record such as a history of depression or the termination of a pregnancy.

Now used in over 70% of primary care practices in Canada, electronic health records are unquestionably better than paper records, albeit that electronic records are plagued with problems. Yet, designed with the needs of health care systems and providers in mind, electronic health records are no more transparent to patients. Why? Is sharing the entirety of the electronic medical record with a patient not the obvious next step in the laudable movement toward shared decision-making and patient–physician collaboration, an ideology that is well established in Canadian health care?

Many physicians do already share the contents of their notes with patients openly and willingly, if informally. Some physicians choose to turn the computer screen to the patient as they type and to dictate referral letters in the presence of a patient, believing that they should not be writing anything about a patient that they would not want him or her to read. Modern information technology and Internet capability offer the potential for useful transparency that has been shown to benefit patients and the health care system. It is no longer appropriate for physicians to want to conceal their version of a patient’s story from the patient. Proper shared decision-making depends on a story on which both agree. Physician and patient groups in Canada must work together with creators of medical information technology to find solutions that will allow electronic medical records to be safely transparent to patients while protecting health care staff from becoming overburdened. A failure by physicians to take a lead on this will mean that they may become victims of pressure or legislation.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/site/misc/cmaj_staff.xhtml

References

  1. ↵
    Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004. Available: www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_04p03_e.htm#BK65 (accessed 2014 June 24).
  2. ↵
    1. Delbanco T,
    2. Walker J,
    3. Bell SK,
    4. et al
    . Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:461–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 11
5 Aug 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency
Kirsten Patrick
CMAJ Aug 2014, 186 (11) 811; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.140834

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency
Kirsten Patrick
CMAJ Aug 2014, 186 (11) 811; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.140834
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
  • Transparency of care
  • Not all patients are the same
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • “Less is better” is the best message when talking to patients about alcohol
  • Without more acute care beds, hospitals are on their own to grapple with emergency department crises
  • Nouvelle politique sur l’utilisation des outils d’intelligence artificielle dans les manuscrits soumis au JAMC
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical ethics
    • Patient education
    • Shared decision-making (doctor-patient)

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire