Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Query

Query

CMAJ May 23, 2006 174 (11) 1678; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050841
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Something strange has been happening to me lately. Indecision. It started when one of my practising friends from medical school called one evening. He asked my advice on an offer he'd recently received from the medical school. Mark's story was like this: he excelled at every clinical rotation. At the end of each rotation, he'd be encouraged by every preceptor to go into that particular specialty because he had such an obvious aptitude for it. Mark was understandably confused by this; each time he received glowing feedback, he would logically feel that X specialty was the one for him — until he became embroiled in rotation Y, which would, inevitably, end with another glowing evaluation and a positive recommendation. Mark reasoned that he might as well position himself to do everything he was good at. He chose Family Medicine.

Figure

Figure. Photo by: Fred Sebastian

All went well for several years — until he received a call from a specialist friend who had happened to talk to one of Mark's old teachers. When the friend mentioned Mark's name, the faculty member went on at length about how good a student Mark had been and how good a practising doctor he must be. The faculty member even offered, through the intermediary, a residency to Mark if Mark wished to reconsider his choice of Family Medicine. Mark's friend passed the information along. Mark followed up on it; soon a residency contract arrived in his mailbox, but, before he signed it, he decided he should ask around for advice. He called me.

When I'm asked for advice from my patients, I'm very careful to not make their decisions for them. The reasons are simple. First of all, the patient should make up her own mind. Secondly, if I choose for her, then I can be blamed if things don't work out. Therefore, I took care to weigh the pros and cons of Mark's situation. The cons: Mark would end up in a limited field, seeing a limited number of problems each day. He would be confined to an academic centre and have no opportunity for the small-town experience that he had been thus far enjoying. He would suffer a drastic fall in income over the course of the residency. He'd be forced to work in an underserviced centre for the first few years after the conclusion of the residency in order to repay the sponsor community.

Then I moved on to the pros: he would be a specialist, and, unfairly, specialists command more respect from today's society. He would be an expert in a field, not a generalist, and so, as an authority, would be able to handle more in that field. Most importantly, he would be a consultant, someone who would offer reassurance and advice to poor generalists who are baffled or confused and in need of his help. It was this latter factor that I really urged him to consider, asking him: “How do you feel after you've talked to a specialist who has been really helpful? Reassured? Confident? Now compare that with someone who belittles you, who gives you the impression that you're incapable of dealing with simple problems and are just wasting his time?”

Mark called me a few months later to say that he had returned to residency. But even before his second call, I had begun to wonder if perhaps I also should return to residency. I loathe certain aspects of general practice: being wedded to problem patients; relatively lower remuneration and a treadmill practice pattern; the attitude of certain patients that they need a specialist before they can be “properly” diagnosed and treated; the much higher proportion — outside of psychiatry — of psychosomatic illness; the lack of real pathology; the knowing a little about too much.

I'm tempted. I turn the question on itself: What's keeping me here? Why continue to practise Family Medicine? And, after all my complaining, the simple answer is: I like it. I like follow up; I like the front line; I like working things up; I like owning more than one body part or blood type. But then the question is: Would I like a specialty as much as I do Family Medicine?

I'll have to ask Mark in a few years. A month ago, over the phone, he whispered: “And if I don't like it, I can always go back to Family Medicine!” Perhaps that's answer enough.

— Dr. Ursus

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 11
23 May 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Query
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Query
CMAJ May 2006, 174 (11) 1678; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050841

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Query
CMAJ May 2006, 174 (11) 1678; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050841
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Query
  • Query
  • Query
Show more Query

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire