Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Query

Query

CMAJ July 19, 2005 173 (2) 218; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050637
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I worked my first walk-in shift yesterday, as a favour for a colleague who had a family emergency. Until then, I'd taken the view that walk-ins exemplified the worst aspects of medicine: patients allowed only one problem, patients ushered out the door with antibiotics for viral complaints, patients McMedicinized, patients double-doctoring. I also resented walk-ins because of their lucrative one patient, one script philosophy, as opposed to the fifteen-minute low-wage average at my own family practice, where I juggle double-digit comorbidities.

Figure

Figure. Photo by: Anson Liaw

The clinic opened at six o'clock, and a flood of people came in. The favourite complaints were the same as in my office and, as per my suspicions, most people wanted antibiotics. But, against my expectation, people were generally satisfied with my reasons as to why they didn't need them. Only two patients demanded them, and in both cases I refused. They were determined, telling me that they hadn't waited 2 hours to see me to be sent home with nothing. These are the patients I expected when I conceived of the walk-in clinic, but they were no more frequent than at my own office.

There were other problems, of course. Pelvic pain, headache, dental pain post-extraction, a moth caught in an entomologist's ear. There was a broader range of problems than at my office, some far more interesting than those I usually see, and certainly some that were more acute. Two patients had to go to the local emergency department for further diagnosis and treatment.

And the pace, the pace. In three and a half hours I saw 40 patients, more than I usually see in an entire day. And, let me tell you, it wasn't because I saw piles of coins dancing in my head. I didn't want all those patients; I had to see them because there was a demand. With each patient who came though the door I fell further and further behind. I did not feel like I was McMedicining every patient; I felt I was doing my best in the limited time allotted. Many of these patients had no family doctor — meaning that, for that night, I was their family doctor and had to consider their other medical problems, their long lists of medications. As this was a downtown walk-in, many of the patients were immigrants and medical interviews were conducted in charades. Cough cough, tummy pats, pointing at the part that hurt … it was a far cry from my medical practice where almost everyone could easily describe what was wrong. Let me say this clearly: I was working far harder than I ever did in my family practice.

It started as a favour and ended as a lesson. When the doctor I covered for asked me how it went, I suspect she braced herself for my usual diatribe about the nefariousness of walk-ins and how they drain the pool of regular family practice physicians. Instead, I simply said that the work was much more difficult than I had anticipated. Far be it for me to apologize more explicitly, after all.

— Dr. Ursus

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 173 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 173, Issue 2
19 Jul 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Query
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Query
CMAJ Jul 2005, 173 (2) 218; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050637

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Query
CMAJ Jul 2005, 173 (2) 218; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050637
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Query
  • Query
  • Query
Show more Query

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire