Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

The eco–biological–behavioural perfect storm that follows heavy snowfall

David A. Alter
CMAJ February 13, 2017 189 (6) E225-E226; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170022
David A. Alter
University Health Network Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute — University Health Network, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Departments of Medicine and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.alter@ices.on.ca
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Snow shovelling has long been known to be an activity that puts particular strain on the cardiovascular system. It incorporates repetitive dynamic aerobic and resistance activity, which induces a Valsalva manoeuvre and places disproportionate workloads on arm rather than leg muscles, resulting in raised heart rate, blood pressure and myocardial oxygen demand.1 Such effects are exacerbated by the vasoconstricting and sympathovagal effects of cold-air inhalation,2 which together may conspire to precipitate myocardial ischemia, plaque rupture, coronary artery thrombosis or arrhythmias.3 Other patient factors such as underlying cardiopulmonary fitness, self-pacing,4 circadian variation and the time of snow clearance,5 and the use of automated or semi-automated snow removal devices, can further modify cardiovascular responsiveness.1

In a linked research study, Auger and colleagues have used routinely collected data to determine an association between the quantity and duration of snowfall and the risks of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in Quebec, Canada, between 1981 and 2014.6 Their findings add weight to our understanding that the act of snow shovelling in cold temperatures sets the stage for an eco–biological–behavioural “perfect storm,” particularly among those physically deconditioned who have or who are at risk of heart disease.3,7

Auger and colleagues’ elegant study incorporates detailed region-specific weather conditions, including daily snowfall and temperature, with individual-level data on hospital admissions and vital statistics. The authors have determined that a heavy snowfall (20 cm v. 0 cm) is associated with a 16% relative increase in the odds of MI-related hospital admission and a 34% relative increase in the odds of death due to MI on the day after a snowfall among men. The adverse cardiovascular effects associated with snowfall were not apparent among women. This finding supports their a priori hypothesis that such sex-related differences were largely attributable to snow-shovelling activities, which would more likely be undertaken by men than by women.

This is not the first study to have explored the effects of weather on cardiovascular events. A large body of evidence has established a higher incidence of MI during winter months than during the summer.5,8 However, epidemiologic evidence associating snowfall and MI has been less consistent.9,10 Unlike most other epidemiologic studies, which incorporated aggregate ecologic data, Auger and colleagues used individual-level data and a time-stratified case–crossover study design, whereby each individual was used as his or her own control. Accordingly, weather conditions were the primary factor that differed between cases and controls. For the most part, the authors’ use of the case–crossover design eliminates or substantially reduces the effects of confounders — traditional factors known to be associated with an increased risk of nonfatal and fatal MI, such as socioeconomic status, comorbidity and seasonality. Another strength of their study is the consistency in results between the quantity and duration of snowfall. The likelihood of acute MI among men rose with the consecutive number of snow days in a dose–response fashion, and did so in the day that most closely followed the snowfall period, which makes the exposure period closely tied to the outcome and, accordingly, makes causality more plausible. Finally, the authors incorporated a number of sensitivity analyses, which included data restriction to the months of December through February, variations in control days (which came before MI events) and restrictions to selected regions (e.g., Montréal and Laval), all of which yielded similar results.

As compelling and impactful as these results might be, we must not forget the limitations of the study’s observational design. We have no information on snow-shovelling activities, patients’ symptoms or other behaviours that may have occurred immediately before, during or after snowfall exposure. Misclassification coding errors may have also existed, which may have included trauma (e.g., motor vehicle accident, hip fracture) where myocardial infarction occurred as a complication rather than a primary diagnosis. Periods of heavy snowfall may also have altered patients’ health-seeking behaviours, making them less likely to seek urgent medical care had symptoms occurred.11

Furthermore, some findings raise questions. For example, the association between quantity of snowfall and MI was similar for men across all age groups. One might have reasonably hypothesized that, had snow shovelling accounted for the adverse events, the odds of cardiovascular events should have risen as the risks of MI, comorbidity and frailty rose. Causal inferences might have been strengthened had the authors explored other “neutral control” or “tracer” conditions for which associations might not have been expected following heavy snowfall exposure periods.

Notwithstanding the interpretative caveats, the potential impact of heavy snowfall on population attributable risk may be nontrivial. Although Auger and colleagues present odds ratios, which overestimate relative risks when events are common, there were nearly 200 000 cases of MI (hospital admissions and deaths combined) in Quebec during the months of November through April over the 13-year study period, of which one-third occurred on the day following a snowfall. Even if one were to apply conservative numbers when estimating the relative risks associated with snowfall, the high prevalence of MI during these periods could translate into hundreds of patients sustaining adverse cardiac events each year in Canada.

Does this imply that all patients who have known cardiovascular disease, or those who remain at risk of cardiovascular disease, should avoid shovelling snow? Perhaps it would be wise for men over 50 years of age who have cardiovascular risk factors or established heart disease and who are physically unfit or habitually sedentary to avoid the activity.3 At the very least, individuals should be made aware of the risks, particularly with heavy snowfall. Such awareness necessitates broader public health attention. For this reason, we must commend Auger and colleagues for raising awareness of this eco–biological–behavioural perfect storm, so that those living in winter climates can avoid the hazard and experience the fruits that are to come in warmer seasons, at least until the extremely hot and humid days of summer when other eco–biological–behavioural storms may arise.

KEY POINTS
  • Heavy snowfall is associated with an increased risk of nonfatal and fatal acute myocardial infarction.

  • Snow shovelling puts particular strain on the cardiovascular system.

  • Men over 50 years of age who have cardiovascular risk factors or established heart disease and who are physically unfit or habitually sedentary may be at highest risk of myocardial infarction after snow shovelling.

Acknowledgement:

David Alter is a Career Investigator with the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario and is supported by a Research Chair in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Rehabilitation, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute–University Health Network.

Footnotes

  • See related article at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.161064

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article was solicited and has not been peer reviewed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Franklin BA,
    2. Hogan P,
    3. Bonzheim K,
    4. et al
    . Cardiac demands of heavy snow shoveling. JAMA 1995;273:880–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Muller MD,
    2. Gao Z,
    3. Drew RC,
    4. et al
    . Effect of cold air inhalation and isometric exercise on coronary blood flow and myocardial function in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2011;111:1694–702.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Janardhanan R,
    2. Henry Z,
    3. Hur DJ,
    4. et al
    . The snow-shoveler’s ST elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2010;106:596–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sheldahl LM,
    2. Wilke NA,
    3. Dougherty SM,
    4. et al
    . Effect of age and coronary artery disease on response to snow shoveling. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1111–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Spielberg C,
    2. Falkenhahn D,
    3. Willich SN,
    4. et al
    . Circadian, day-of-week, and seasonal variability in myocardial infarction: comparison between working and retired patients. Am Heart J 1996;132:579–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Auger N,
    2. Potter BJ,
    3. Smargiassi A,
    4. et al
    . Association between quantity and duration of snowfall and risk of myocardial infarction. CMAJ 2017;189:E235–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Glass RI,
    2. Wiesenthal AM,
    3. Zack MM,
    4. et al
    . Risk factors for myocardial infarction associated with the Chicago snowstorm of Jan. 13–15, 1979. JAMA 1981;245:164–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Gerber Y,
    2. Jacobsen SJ,
    3. Killian JM,
    4. et al
    . Seasonality and daily weather conditions in relation to myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 to 2002. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:287–92.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Baker-Blocker A
    . Winter weather and cardiovascular mortality in Minneapolis–St. Paul. Am J Public Health 1982;72:261–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Southern DA,
    2. Knudtson ML,
    3. Ghali WA
    APPROACH Investigators. Myocardial infarction on snow days: incidence, procedure, use and outcomes. Can J Cardiol 2006;22:59–61.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Wong HT,
    2. Chiu MY,
    3. Wu CS,
    4. et al.
    Senior Citizen Home Safety Association. The influence of weather on health-related help-seeking behavior of senior citizens in Hong Kong. Int J Biometeorol 2015;59:373–6.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 6
13 Feb 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The eco–biological–behavioural perfect storm that follows heavy snowfall
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The eco–biological–behavioural perfect storm that follows heavy snowfall
David A. Alter
CMAJ Feb 2017, 189 (6) E225-E226; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The eco–biological–behavioural perfect storm that follows heavy snowfall
David A. Alter
CMAJ Feb 2017, 189 (6) E225-E226; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170022
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgement:
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Time to dismantle systemic anti-Black racism in medicine in Canada
  • Preventing the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 into school settings
  • How should we move for health? The case for the 24-hour movement paradigm
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire