Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Why Trumpcare failed

Roger Collier
CMAJ May 01, 2017 189 (17) E645-E646; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095414
Roger Collier
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

United States President Donald Trump is no fan of the Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as Obamacare. He wanted it gone, replaced by the American Health Care Act — a.k.a. Trumpcare.

His plan would be far superior to Obamacare, Trump boasted. It would be cheaper, better and provide “insurance for everybody.” Obamacare “is one of the greatest threats our country faces. It is unsustainable and will lead American into complete insolvency,” Trump said in one of his 435 tweets that bashed the Affordable Care Act.

In the end, however, what one pundit dubbed a “magical mystery Obamacare alternative” failed to find enough support. It was “cruel magic thinking,” said another observer.

The list of critics was long, diverse and crossed political lines. Even hardcore conservative commentators expressed dismay, including Ann Coulter, who tweeted, “Who wrote this piece of crap Obamacare replacement bill?”

Facing an inevitable “stinging defeat” in the House of Representatives, Trump eventually pulled the bill, on March 25, and the White House shifted its focus to tax reform.

So what went wrong?

One theory is that Trump and his team were never serious about repealing Obamacare in the first place. It was just politics, something he said he would do during his election campaign.

It was noted, for instance, that the efforts to repeal lasted a mere 63 days. The Affordable Care Act, on the other hand, was passed in March 2010 after more than a year of debate involving Congress and the White House.

Another problem was that the promises Trump made, both about cutting costs and about improving care, rang hollow to many Americans. Even more so after a report by the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill would cut $880 billion from Medicaid over a decade, and would eventually cost 53 million Americans their health insurance, including 14 million in the first year.

One national poll found that only 17% of Americans supported Trump’s bill, with 56% in opposition and 26% undecided. Even among Republicans, support topped out at 24%.

Figure1

Overhauling health care for 320 million people turned out to be more complicated than US President Donald Trump had anticipated.

Image courtesy of Reuters/Carol Barria

Critics claimed that Trump was adhering to the “free-lunch fallacy” — promising that people could pay less yet get more. Even The Wall Street Journal referred to the proposed health care bill as a “gamble,” suggesting that Trump’s plan basically boiled down to hoping fellow Republicans “won’t dare block it.”

Many Americans became so concerned that they turned to activism, both online and in public. They engaged on social media. They attended town hall meetings. Some protested at Trump International Hotel and Tower in New York, carrying signs with messages such as “Trumpcare makes us sick.”

On the political front, it may have been Trump’s ego and indifference that cost him the health care battle, according to some commenters. An article in The New York Times detailing Trumpcare’s demise suggested that Trump doesn’t believe the regular rules of politics in Washington apply to him, and that he remains, at heart, “an image-obsessed developer with a lifelong indifference toward the mechanics of governance.”

Other political insiders have suggested that Trump appeared more interested in saving face than learning the complexities of the health care system. He feared the optics of losing and how it would affect his first-term agenda and, eventually, his chances for re-election in 2020.

He was not one to sweat the details about health care, according to one political aide, who told CNN that Trump either “doesn’t know, doesn’t care, or both.” Indeed, according to Politico, the president is not one to pay too much attention to day-to-day operations, leaving that up to those below him.

“Trump is a business executive. When he tells his lieutenants to get something done, he’s used to it getting done,” one senior Republican aide told Politico. “He’s really not used to getting involved himself.”

Even Trump admitted that the challenge of transforming health care was bigger than he had imagined, saying in late February, “Nobody knew that health care could be so complicated”.

Later, when asked about this statement Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who also aspired to be president, broke into laughter. “When you provide health care in a nation of 320 million people, yeah, it is very, very complicated,” he said.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (17)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 17
1 May 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why Trumpcare failed
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Why Trumpcare failed
Roger Collier
CMAJ May 2017, 189 (17) E645-E646; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095414

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Why Trumpcare failed
Roger Collier
CMAJ May 2017, 189 (17) E645-E646; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095414
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Canada’s long road to a vaccine injury compensation program
  • Health advocates want help handling online harassment
  • Reconciliation in health care must go beyond cultural sensitivity
Show more News

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire