Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research in CMAJ Open

Highlights

CMAJ November 03, 2015 187 (16) 1210; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.151173
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Wait times for bariatric surgery

Increasing rates of obesity have led to growing demand for bariatric surgery, a cost-effective treatment for severe obesity. How have wait times been affected? In this retrospective cohort study, researchers analyzed the impact of patient and operational factors on wait times for bariatric surgery at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Of the 1664 patients referred for surgery between 2008 and 2011 who were included in the analysis, 724 underwent the procedure. Patients waited a mean of 440 (standard deviation 198) days, with a median wait time of 445 (interquartile range 298–533) days, far beyond the provincially mandated target of 365 days from referral to surgery. Some waited as long as 4 years, while others had surgery as soon as 3 months after referral. Nearly half the excess time was spent between referral and program orientation. Factors affecting wait times included active substance use and referral later in the study period. Body mass index, sex and distance from the hospital did not affect wait times (Table 1). The authors noted that previous operational decisions significantly increased the wait time for surgery and recommended that the implications of process-level decision-making be carefully considered before implementation. CMAJ Open 2015;3:E331–7.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1:

Differences in time-to-surgery (only patients who underwent bariatric surgery were included in the analysis (n = 724)*

Sex differences in methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder

Men and women differ in susceptibility to opioid use disorder, but they also differ in their response to methadone treatment. Using treatment standards that offer the same clinical management of this disorder for both men and women may not achieve optimum treatment outcomes for either sex. This systematic review included 20 studies (18 observational, 2 randomized clinical trials) that looked at sex differences in outcomes of methadone treatment, including drug use, health status and social functioning. Among the 9732 participants, women were less likely than men to use alcohol (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31 to 0.86), report arrests or legal supervision (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.84) or be employed (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.73) during treatment. In contrast, women were more likely than men to use amphetamines during this time (Figure 1). Patterns of opioid use were similar. Owing to large differences in follow-up periods, a meta-analysis was not possible to look at sex differences in long-term prognosis. Although the quality of evidence was generally low, the researchers concluded that there is a need for improved implementation of sex-specific treatment strategies. CMAJ Open 2015;3:E344–E51.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1:

Meta-analysis of sex-related difference in amphetamine use over the past 6 months of treatment among women and men receiving methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorders. An odds ratio (OR) greater than 1.0 indicates an increased likelihood of women reporting amphetamine use. CI = confidence interval.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (16)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 16
3 Nov 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Highlights
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Highlights
CMAJ Nov 2015, 187 (16) 1210; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.151173

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Highlights
CMAJ Nov 2015, 187 (16) 1210; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.151173
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Wait times for bariatric surgery
    • Sex differences in methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Highlights
  • Highlights
  • Highlights
Show more Research in CMAJ Open

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire