Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Migrant workers’ health rights unmet

Wendy Glauser
CMAJ July 08, 2014 186 (10) E351-E352; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4799
Wendy Glauser
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A recent court decision denying injured migrant farm workers health care after their work visas expire is only the latest attack on these workers’ health rights, according to advocates, who say these labourers die, are injured or are exposed to carcinogenic chemicals with impunity in Canada.

In mid-April, the Ontario Divisional Court ruled the province does not have to pay for health care for Denville Clarke and Kenroy Williams, two Jamaicans formerly employed by the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP).

Nearly 30 000 migrant workers come to Canada each year under the program, with the majority working in Ontario.

Clarke and Williams were injured in a 2012 crash while riding to work in their employer’s van, which they say didn’t have enough seat belts for all nine passengers. One worker was killed in the crash and the others were sent to their home countries, but Clarke and Williams stayed in Ontario to fight for compensation. Although all temporary farm workers are entitled to injury compensation, it’s woefully inadequate and nearly impossible to access after workers leave the country, according to Chris Ramsaroop, an organizer with advocacy group Justicia for Migrant Workers. Clarke and Williams say none of their fellow injured passengers have received any compensation.

Clarke said he can no longer turn his neck to the left and has pain that “shoots straight down my spine.” Williams reports frequent bouts of dizziness and often has to lie down when his pain becomes unbearable, because he can no longer afford medication. Although two earlier court decisions forced the Ontario government to provide provincial health coverage while the two seek injury compensation from the Workers’ Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB), the most recent decision cut them off as of Mar. 31. In court, the Ontario Health Ministry argued that a decision in Clarke and Williams’ favour would mean the government would have to pay for migrant workers’ health coverage “in perpetuity.” But Dr. Ritika Goel, a Toronto-based physician who lobbies for health care access for people living in Canada without status, called this concern “ridiculous.” The ministry could decide who to cover on a case-by-case basis, she noted. “It’s exceptional that migrant workers are injured here and need to stay.”

Figure

Migrant farm workers Kenroy Williams (left) and Denville Clarke (right) have been fighting for compensation since a 2012 crash.

Image courtesy of Justicia for Migrant Workers

“I feel pissed off … it feels like we are animals,” said Williams, a single father who can no longer afford school fees for his five children. He has earned $300 a week as a farm worker in Canada since 2006; back home in Jamaica, he can only find work as a driver, which pays $25 a week.

Paucity of data

Several government bodies were contacted regarding the rate of injury and death among migrant farm workers, to no avail. According to Janet McLaughlin, a researcher with the International Migration Research Centre, such information is not publicly available.

Foreign Agricultural Resource Management Services (F.A.R.M.S.), a private organization contracted by the federal government to administer the SAWP program in Ontario, does keep these numbers, but F.A.R.M.S. general manager Sue Williams wouldn’t release this data, citing “privacy reasons.”

A portion of the F.A.R.M.S. data was, however, submitted to the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal in 2012, after the family of Ned Peart, a Jamaican man who was crushed to death by a tobacco kiln in 2002, filed a complaint. It argued that Peart’s rights were violated because under the Ontario Coroner’s Act inquiries are automatically held into workers deaths’ in some sectors, but not in agriculture. There has never been an inquiry into the death of a migrant farm worker in Canada, said Ramsaroop. Peart’s family is still waiting for the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal to make a decision.

According to that data, between 1996 and 2011, 1198 migrant farm workers in Ontario were sent home for “medical reasons.” When an employer fires a worker or sends a worker home on medical grounds, they have no legal recourse to appeal, Ramsaroop added.

“Migrant farm workers’ rights are protected by the government liaison officer of their source country,” stated Jordan Sinclair, a spokesperson for Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, the federal government body that authorizes the SAWP program, in an email.

The liaison officers are expected to, among other regulatory tasks, inform workers of their rights (which includes the right to refuse unsafe work), inspect housing, ensure workers have health and injury insurance and act as an intermediary when employers terminate a worker, Sinclair wrote.

But advocates argue that the liaison officers’ role of upholding rights is thwarted by conflict of interest. The officers’ jobs and their country’s economy depend on maintaining their country’s spots in the temporary worker programs. Therefore, liaison officers strive to ensure their country’s workers are seen as agreeable in the eyes of employers.

“Each of the countries is competing for jobs,” said Ramsaroop. “They think of the contract first and the workers’ interest second.”

Interestingly, however, migrant workers are treated like Canadians in at least one respect: their injury compensation is cut off, often within a year, if, despite their injury, they are deemed able to work in another occupation with a comparable pay rate in Ontario, such as pumping gas — a practice known as “deeming.”

“Migrant workers are entitled to the same benefits as any worker in an Ontario workplace,” wrote Christine Arnott, public relations specialist for WSIB. When asked why a migrant worker who is only entitled to work in agriculture is treated as though they can work in any industry, Arnott replied, “We have provided you with all of the information we have.” Although Arnott couldn’t comment on any specific cases, Maryth Yachnin, the lawyer for Williams and Clarke in the provincial health care case, said Williams and Clarke were likely also cut off by WSIB because of deeming.

Workers used as “machines”

In addition to injuries related to road and farm equipment accidents, migrant workers also experience health problems stemming from pesticide exposure, cramped and isolated living conditions and the repetitive nature of their work. “The ones we see most often are musculoskeletal pain and injuries,” said McLaughlin. Most workers don’t demand reduced hours or modified work because of the precarious nature of their employment, she added. In late April, a worker informed Ramsaroop he’d been fired for refusing to work without gloves. Goel said workers are reluctant to report an injury or health concern, because they fear they could be sent home. “We’ve created really terrible power dynamics.”

In terms of chemical exposure, “people have thrown up, people have fainted, and we also see kidney failure,” Ramsaroop said, but it’s difficult for workers to prove the link between exposure and their symptoms. “The long-term effects are going to be years down the road.”

Mental health issues are also rife among migrant workers because of the lack of down-time and the alienating environment, added Goel. “You’re being watched at all times, you’re working 10 to 12 hours a day, seven days a week and you’re far away from all of your loved ones. We’re essentially using these people as machines.”

Although all migrant farm workers are entitled to health coverage for the duration of their work visas, access to health care is an issue. Workers must often rely on their employers for transportation to clinics and in some cases, are accompanied into the examination room by their boss, said Ramsaroop. Meanwhile, some employers delay registering their employees for health cards or illegally hold their employees’ health cards, he explained.

McLaughlin argues the treatment of migrant farm workers raises a major question for Canadians. “What kind of society are we living in where we bring workers here to work year after year and they pay their taxes, and then they suffer a major injury or illness and we refuse to help them in their time of need?”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 10
8 Jul 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Migrant workers’ health rights unmet
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Migrant workers’ health rights unmet
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Jul 2014, 186 (10) E351-E352; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4799

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Migrant workers’ health rights unmet
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Jul 2014, 186 (10) E351-E352; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4799
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Paucity of data
    • Workers used as “machines”
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What the U.S. overturning Roe v. Wade means for Canada
  • Is one-way masking enough?
  • XE, XD & XF: what to know about the Omicron hybrid variants
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Immigrant & refugee health
    • Occupational health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire