Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

A closer look at European health care reforms

Christina Pellegrini
CMAJ January 07, 2014 186 (1) E24; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4673
Christina Pellegrini
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The openness to try innovative solutions is the “most striking difference” between the health care systems of European countries and Canada, according to the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, a public policy think tank in Ottawa, Ontario.

Canada should look to Sweden and Switzerland for examples of potentially beneficial health reforms, including activity-based funding, more private provision of care and allowing doctors to practise under both private and public systems, the institute’s reports in A European Flavour For Medicine.

“I think if you want to stimulate productivity … you have to allow changes to enter into the system by outsiders,” explains Mattias Lundbäck, an economics researcher in Stockholm, Sweden, and the author of the report.

Similar recommendations were made earlier this year in a report comparing the health systems of Canada and Australia. Medicare advocates, however, suggest that health care should be regarded as a public service rather than a business. Introducing more private care and activity-based funding can lead to disproportionate value being placed on certain medical services, regional variations in care and inequitable access depending on income, they warn.

Canada spends more on health care than other developed nations with universal care, yet performs worse on several quality indicators, according to the Macdonald-Laurier report. The number of hospital beds available in Canada is substantially lower than the average for member nations of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In 2009, Canada had 3.3 beds available per 1000 people, compared to the average of 5.5 beds.

In addition, Canada had fewer practising physicians per 1000 people (2.4) than the OECD average (3.1). Sweden and Switzerland had at least 3.5 physicians per 1000 people, states the report. Canadian patients also spend more time in hospital. The average length of stay in Canada was 7.7 days in 2009 compared to 5.7 in Sweden.

The report attributes these gaps to the different ways European countries fund and deliver health care. For example, Switzerland pays its hospitals on an activity-funded basis, which “involves paying providers for each individual they care for, based on the expected costs of treating the patient’s condition.”

Unlike under global budgets — the predominant way in which Canadian provinces fund hospital services — activity-based funding does not “retrospectively pay for all services provided to the patient, which provides a strong incentive for cost control by the provider.”

Meanwhile, in Sweden, allowing private delivery of health services alongside the public system has resulted in shorter wait times, states the report. In 2010, more than half of Swedish patients reported gaining access to a primary care provider within one day. In comparison, only 33% of Canadians were able to get appointments that quickly.

When taking lessons from other systems, a country should not focus on only one area, says Lundbäck. “I think it is more of a need to try to look at ways of doing things differently, and experimenting with models for health care deliveries and new organizational models.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 1
7 Jan 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A closer look at European health care reforms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A closer look at European health care reforms
Christina Pellegrini
CMAJ Jan 2014, 186 (1) E24; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4673

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A closer look at European health care reforms
Christina Pellegrini
CMAJ Jan 2014, 186 (1) E24; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4673
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feds update immunization advice with Moderna vaccine approval
  • Canada will have three-digit suicide prevention hotline by 2023
  • Trudeau promises to boost federal health transfers when the pandemic is over
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health economics
    • Health care coverage

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire