Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Physician codes of conduct becoming a norm

Roger Collier
CMAJ May 17, 2011 183 (8) 892-893; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3838
Roger Collier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Hospitals in North America and around the world are increasingly asking doctors to sign codes of conduct as a precondition of hospital privileges. Supporters of this trend say it will improve professionalism and reduce disruptive behaviour. Critics warn that it reeks of authoritarianism and is insulting to physicians.

In some jurisdictions, codes of conduct are relatively new. The Ottawa Hospital in Ontario, for instance, has only recently drafted what it calls a “physician engagement agreement,” which includes such commitments as “Engage with others, actively listen to them, communicate respectively, and consider their ideas” and “Communicate with patients and families in a clear, timely, supportive, engaged and empathetic manner.” The Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons drafted a code of conduct in 2009.

“I think they are becoming more common,” says Dr. Janet Wright, assistant registrar of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, citing the increased presence of such codes not only in Canada, but also in other countries, including the United States, New Zealand and Australia.

The purpose of a physician code of conduct is to clearly establish the expectations of professional behaviour for doctors and to create a consistent process for handling complaints about disruptive behaviour. It is important that the codes are implemented properly and that breaches are handled fairly, says Wright.

“There needs to be a fair process,” she adds. “The doctor should be notified and both sides of the story should be heard.”

Then again, perhaps the very notion of fairness is impossible for codes of conduct that only apply to particular individuals in a workplace. “I’m not condoning bad behaviour, but putting these rules up there that are applied solely to physicians is demeaning. I wonder if it’s more about control than about quashing bad behaviour,” says Dr. Lawrence Huntoon, a US neurologist and editor-in-chief of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. “I think there is a bias regarding disruptive physicians. You rarely hear about disruptive nurses or disruptive hospital administrators.”

Figure

One purpose of physician codes of conduct is to encourage a culture of safety in hospitals by reducing intimidating behaviours, which discourage open reporting of adverse events, hazards and unsafe conditions.

Image courtesy of © 2011 Jupiterimages Corp.

Huntoon wrote in a 2008 editorial that codes of conducts are insulting to doctors and that their underlying purpose is to diminish “the professional standard of physicians on staff and in so doing increases the hospital’s authority and control over physicians” (JPANDS 2008;13:2–4).

They are sometimes put into effect without feedback from medical staff, he says. The language in the codes is also vague and could turn highly subjective incidents, such as potentially offensive body language or facial expressions, into grounds for dismissal.

Subjecting physicians to a long list of prohibited behaviours is akin to treating doctors like juvenile delinquents who don’t know right from wrong, he says, adding that it damages the medical profession. “To actually write some of these things down, it sets the physician at such a low level. … It says: ‘We don’t trust you. We have to spell it out for you.’ It gives the impression to the public that doctors can’t be trusted.”

Similar concerns were raised in a paper challenging the merits of a code of conduct drafted by the Australian Medical Council (MJA 2009;190:104–5). The paper claims that the code, though seemingly benign, would be difficult to enforce, contribute to a “insidious, creeping authoritarianism,” and ultimately impoverish medical practice. “Codes of conduct can foster and reinforce the strength and effectiveness of professional communities and moral norms and processes,” it concludes. “However, they can also provide a vehicle for oversimplifying the moral world, stripping ethics of its context, and supporting an excessively rigid, restrictive and narrow moral regime.”

That’s not how Dr. Paul Schyve sees it. Schyve is senior vice-president of The Joint Commission, a nonprofit body that accredits and certifies US health care organizations. Roughly two years ago, it began requiring codes of conduct as a condition of hospital accreditation. The codes have to define acceptable, disruptive and inappropriate behaviours, Schyve says, adding that the purpose of such codes is to encourage a culture of safety, where people feel free to report adverse events, close calls, hazards and unsafe conditions. Intimidation in the workplace discourages such reporting.

“Specific behaviours can sour the work environment,” says Schyve. “We often use the phrase ‘disruptive behaviors,’ though that is probably not the best phrase. A better one would be ‘intimidating behaviours,’ which keep people from reporting important incidents.”

As for criticisms that hospital codes of conduct single out doctors and don’t apply to other medical staff members, that is not the case at all, according to a Joint Commission paper, Behaviors that undermine a culture of safety (www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_alert_issue_40_behaviors_that_undermine_a_culture_of_safety/). It notes that although most research in the area has focused on “disruptive behaviors among physicians and nurses, there is evidence that these behaviors occur among other health care professionals, such as pharmacists, therapists, and support staff, as well as among administrators.”

Therefore, the Joint Commision suggests that all hospital employees, “both physicians and non-physician staff,” be educated on appropriate professional behaviour as defined in their codes. Furthermore, hospitals should “enforce the code consistently and equitably among all staff regardless of seniority or clinical discipline.”

US hospitals can’t be forced to adopt codes of conduct, but without accreditation from The Joint Commission, they can’t receive payments from Medicaid or Medicare, so most do — around 80%, says Schyve. Hospitals are granted latitude in terms of the exact content of their codes, and, for the most part, there have been few complaints about them.

“There has been very little negative reaction from hospitals,” says Schyve.

Hospitals that adopt codes of conduct should also determine how they will handle cases that violate the code, says Kathryn Clarke, senior communications coordinator for the College of Surgeons of Ontario. “The second part is establishing a protocol so that if the code of conduct is breached, you know how people will be treated.”

The best way to handle incidents is to intervene early, identify the people involved and the alleged violations, and then resolve the issue before it escalates, according to the college’s guidebook for managing disruptive physician behaviour (www.cpso.on.ca/policies/positions/default.aspx?id=1730). There is nothing unusual, adds Clarke, about employers clearly defining the expectations they have for their employees.

“Codes of conduct are not unique to hospital settings,” says Clarke. “It’s a universal principal. You set expectations for people in advance, and you implement a fair process for dealing with concerns as they come up.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 8
17 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician codes of conduct becoming a norm
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physician codes of conduct becoming a norm
Roger Collier
CMAJ May 2011, 183 (8) 892-893; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3838

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Physician codes of conduct becoming a norm
Roger Collier
CMAJ May 2011, 183 (8) 892-893; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3838
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers
    • Professional conduct & regulation

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire