Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

National benchmarks for treatment of seniors’ mental health recommended

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ November 22, 2011 183 (17) E1223-E1224; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4028
Lauren Vogel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Minimum benchmarks should be implemented regarding the number of beds and health care workers available to treat seniors with mental health problems, the Mental Health Commission of Canada recommends.

The benchmarks, such as the provision of a minimum 7.5 residential mental health beds per 10 000 elderly, would serve to reduce the current fragmentation of mental health services for seniors, the nonprofit organization argued in its Guidelines for Comprehensive Mental Health Services for Older Adults in Canada (www.mentalhealthcommission.ca/seniorsguidelines/seniors-guidelines.pdf).

As Canada’s population ages, it also becomes more susceptible to mental health problems and illness, says Dr. Marie-France Tourigny-Rivard, chair of the commission’s Seniors Advisory Committee. A quarter of older Canadians already suffer from mental health problems, as compared to a fifth of the general population, yet mental health services for seniors are frequently difficult to access and navigate, she says.

Figure

Accurate diagnosis of mental illness in seniors can be challenging because many older adults live with multiple chronic health conditions.

Image courtesy of © 2011 Thinkstock

In addition to a minimum 7.5 residential beds for longer-term stabilization and treatment for seniors with severe and persistent behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in a specially designed unit in a long-term care facility, the guidelines recommend, per 10 000 elderly:

  • 5.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) health professionals for seniors’ mental health outreach and community teams to provide “consultation-liaison services to residential (long-term) care homes, collaborative/shared care in community settings and capacity building models of care”

  • 5.25 FTE health professionals for intensive community treatment and support for seniors with persistent and severe mental illnesses

  • 3 acute short-term inpatient psychiatric beds located on a general acute care psychiatric inpatient services, “ideally with geriatric psychiatrist consultation/support and average length of stay of approximately 1 month”

  • 3.3 specialized geriatric psychiatry inpatient beds for assessment and active treatment for seniors who require the care of a specialized geriatric team in hospital, with an average length of stay below 90 days

  • 3 or fewer specialized geriatric psychiatry inpatient beds, depending on the availability of residential mental health beds, for rehabilitation or chronic care in a psychiatric hospital over 90 days for those with severe and persistent disorders.

To date, “no region in Canada has met these benchmarks 100%,” Rivard says, adding that most areas have some of the core elements in place that can readily be strengthened.

The commission recommended that minimum guidelines be used to “review existing services and staffing levels and guide future allocation and deployment of resources, taking into account the size of the population, existing gaps in services and bottlenecks, as well as priorities of the community.”

The commission, which was established in 2007 by the Conservative government and provided $140 million over 10 years to craft a national mental health strategy, argued that the benchmarks and guidelines for the treatment of seniors with mental health problems would help to create a system where “mental health is everybody’s business.”

To that end, the guidelines recommended that:

  • “Mental health promotion should be embedded in all policies, programs, and services for all older adults (including those with mental illness) and their caregivers, and encompass anti-stigma strategies, public awareness, education, and training;

  • Older adults, caregivers, service providers and the public should be informed about the importance of early identification of symptoms of mental illness, prevention strategies and the hope for recovery and well-being;

  • The specific components of an integrated mental health service system for older adults may vary according to local context and resources, but all service systems should provide access to the following range of services for the entire senior population: community-based support services, primary care services, general mental health services and specialized seniors mental health services (including specialized community and outreach services to residential care facilities as well as specialized geriatric psychiatry inpatient services).”

In arguing that the system become more “recovery oriented,” the commission also noted that implementation of the guidelines would require “cross-sectoral and multi-sectoral partnerships/collaborations that go beyond/outside the mental health care/service system … (and) clear mechanisms in place to facilitate collaboration and access between services.”

While noting that many older adults live with multiple chronic health conditions, which can make accurate diagnosis more challenging, Rivard says the system simply must become more effective in diagnosing mental illness in seniors.

To that end, the commission urged more training of both health care workers and informal caregivers. “Without proper training and attention, treatable illnesses can, and do, go unnoticed by healthcare providers,” the guidelines state. “Transformation of a mental health service system must include training, education and support for caregivers and health care providers to increase their capacity to respond to the mental health needs of seniors.”

Meanwhile, family and other informal caregivers, who provide more than 80% of care to seniors and contribute more than $5 billion of unpaid labour to the health care system, “are not adequately supported by health and social services or by public policy,” the commission stated. “Most public policies that affect caregivers directly or indirectly (e.g., health services, labour) have been developed without taking into account their needs and may have unintentional negative effects on caregivers and their families, compromising their capacity to provide care.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (17)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 17
22 Nov 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
National benchmarks for treatment of seniors’ mental health recommended
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
National benchmarks for treatment of seniors’ mental health recommended
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Nov 2011, 183 (17) E1223-E1224; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4028

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
National benchmarks for treatment of seniors’ mental health recommended
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Nov 2011, 183 (17) E1223-E1224; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4028
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire