Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

The hazards of nursing

Wayne Kondro
CMAJ February 13, 2007 176 (4) 437; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.061704
Wayne Kondro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

A staggering 18% of 18 348 Canadian nurses responding to a recent survey say their patients were “occasionally” or “frequently” administered the wrong medication or dose while in their care, according the first National Survey of the Work and Health of Nurses.

On the other side of the coin, nurses themselves are more likely to suffer injury, stress-related health problems, or experience emotional abuse from patients, according to the findings of the survey, the largest and most comprehensive ever undertaken on nurses' working conditions, and physical and mental health.

Some 29% of the respondents indicated that they'd been physically assaulted by a patient in the year 2005, while 44% said they'd been subjected to emotional abuse. The survey, a joint initiative of the Canadian Institute of Health Information, Statistics Canada, and Health Canada, saw roughly 19 000 of the nation's 314 900 employed nurses interviewed about their work environment and health.

Equally surprising were survey findings related to quality of care, including medication mishaps and other adverse events such as infections originating from a hospital or health care setting.

According to the survey, patients are most likely to receive the wrong medication, or the wrong dose of a medication, in a long-term care facility (22.8%), as opposed to 19.2% in hospitals (Table 1). There was also a significant variation in the regional distribution of reported medication errors, from a high of 27.5% in Quebec, to a low of 6.5% in Newfoundland and Labrador. The remaining provinces fell within the 12.4%–17.5% range.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1.

Quebec nurses also reported a higher incidence of patient infections originating within the hospital or health care setting in which they were employed. A phenomenal 42% of Quebec nurses say there was occasional or frequent nosocomial infection in their patients, slightly above the national average of 35.2%. The national average rose to 39.5% in a hospital setting, as compared to 36% in a long-term care facility, 15.1% in community health clinics, or 17.9% in other settings (e.g., physicians' offices, private nursing agencies, etc.).

Roughly one-third of nurses said their patients were injured in a fall in 2005, ranging from a high of 63.4% in long-term care facilities and 26.1% in hospitals, to 15.4% in community health settings and 17.4% in other settings.

Some 8.9% of nurses said they were injured while working during 2005, including 10.6% in hospitals and 9.6% in long-term care facilities. That tally rose to a high of 12.3% in British Columbia.

The latter were among a number of findings indicating that nursing is becoming one of the nation's most hazardous professions. Those findings included ones indicating that 48% of nurses suffered a needle-stick or cut on the job; 29% were physically assaulted; 44% were subjected to emotional abuse by patients or families of patients; 25% suffered chronic back problems; and 9% suffered from depression.

Canadian Nurses Association President Marlene Smadu says the report does a remarkable job of illustrating the impact of institutional and psycho-social factors, such as staff shortages and excessive workload, on mental and physical health.

The high incidence of adverse events is consistent with research indicating that “with every additional patient that a registered nurse has above what was considered to be an appropriate level, they could predict the increases in patient falls, patient infection rates, failure to rescue situations, you know, where someone is going downhill and that isn't picked up early enough,” Smadu said.

Smadu argues that the findings also illustrate the need for a national action plan “to improve the quality of the workplace” in health care settings, as well as some form of national agency, similar to the National Patient Safety Institute, to serve as a clearinghouse of evidence-based best practices.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 176 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 176, Issue 4
13 Feb 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The hazards of nursing
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The hazards of nursing
Wayne Kondro
CMAJ Feb 2007, 176 (4) 437; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.061704

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The hazards of nursing
Wayne Kondro
CMAJ Feb 2007, 176 (4) 437; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.061704
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unpacking “long COVID”
  • Health advocates want help handling online harassment
  • Canada’s long road to a vaccine injury compensation program
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Public health
    • Nursing

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire