Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Commentary

Family care and burden at the end of life

Steven H. Zarit
CMAJ June 08, 2004 170 (12) 1811-1812; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040196
Steven H. Zarit
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In their article on family burden and the care of breast cancer patients (see page 1795), Grunfeld and colleagues make a fundamental and important point: family members provide a considerable amount of the care for people with terminal illnesses and their own health may suffer as a consequence.1 In their study of 89 caregivers of women with advanced breast cancer, caregivers were significantly more anxious than patients and were substantially more likely to be depressed. The caregivers reported a considerable increase in burden and depression by the time the patients reached the terminal stage of illness. Over three-quarters of those who were employed reported that they had to miss work because of their caregiving responsibilities.

Care at the end of life has been overlooked in the literature on family caregiving, perhaps because its duration is relatively brief compared with the assistance given to people with diseases such as Alzheimer's that can span a decade or more. In those long-term care conditions, caregiving has a dramatic impact on the health and well-being of family caregivers. Between 40% and 70% of caregivers have been found to have clinically significant levels of depressive symptoms, and as many as 50% may meet criteria for a diagnosable depressive disorder at some point in their caregiving careers.2,3,4,5,6,7 Caregivers have been found to have an elevated risk of death compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects who are not providing care.8 The work done by Grunfeld and colleagues, along with other recent studies,9,10 demonstrates that risks to health and well-being for caregivers assisting relatives at the end of life are similar to risks for caregivers in long-term care situations.

These studies of the adverse effects of caregiving underscore the central role that families play in the care of people with a disease or disability. Although families have always cared for sick family members, both cultural and medical practice factors have made these responsibilities more difficult. Notable changes in family life such as increased participation in the work place and decreased family size mean that there are fewer family members available to provide care. Those who are available may very likely have to work outside the home. In the area of medical care, decreasing length of hospital stays and decreased coverage for home health services result in families having to take on new tasks (e.g., providing intravenous medications, taking care of bladder catheters and managing home oxygen) that were previously performed by health care personnel. Even in countries such as Sweden, that are generally known for providing services to people at home, families are being asked to provide more of the care.11

In these circumstances, we need to consider family caregivers and be concerned about them for 2 reasons. First, family caregivers must be recognized as an essential part of the treatment team. By clearly recognizing this role, physicians and other health care providers encourage caregivers to be more confident about their abilities to care for their loved ones. Further, without their assistance, or with a faltering assistance, not only will the societal costs of chronic and terminal care be substantially greater, but the well-being and perhaps even the survival rates of patients will be much poorer. Second, physicians and other health care providers need to be alert to the heavy burden that such care places on caregivers. The burden of care should be assessed, stress levels and mental health monitored (especially for depressive symptoms) and appropriate steps taken to prevent caregivers from becoming overwhelmed.

These caregiver needs must be addressed in a sensitive way, with interventions that support caregivers emotionally and in the performance of their care activities. In a comprehensive review of caregiving for terminally ill patients, Haley12 described several promising strategies for helping families. A fundamental step is providing families with the information they need to understand the patient's illness and manage the various tasks required of them. They may benefit from learning how to communicate better with the patient, as well as examining their own role, including the ups and downs they are facing and the possibility of finding rewards or satisfaction in what they are doing. Getting help with care tasks in the home may be useful in reducing their level of stress. Haley also pointed out that, although many people receive help with their grief after the patient's death, some caregivers are largely overlooked, such as those who cared for a relative in a nursing home.

These approaches are straightforward, but they depend on having a psychologist or other health care professional familiar with end-of-life care included as part of the treatment team. Although time and effort are required, these strategies may help caregivers provide the care they want to and provide better home care at a reduced risk to their own health. There may even be a potential for cost-savings: caregivers who are more knowledgeable and confident may place fewer demands on the physician and other health care providers.

𝛃 See related article page 1795

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

    Correspondence to: Steven Zarit, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, 211 Henderson Building South, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-6505, USA; fax 814 863-7963; z67{at}psu.edu

References

  1. 1.↵
    Grunfeld E, Coyle D, Whelan T, Clinch J, Reyno L, Earle CC, et al. Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers. CMAJ 2004;170(12):1795-801.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Friss LR, Whitlatch CJ. Who's taking care? A statewide study of family caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Care Related Dis Res 1991;6:16-26.
  3. 3.↵
    Gallagher D, Rose J, Rivera P, Lovett S, Thompson LW. Prevalence of depression in family caregivers. Gerontologist 1989;29:449-56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Pruchno RA, Resch NL. Aberrant behaviors and Alzheimer's disease: mental health effects on spouse caregivers. J Gerontol 1989;44(5): S177-S82.
  5. 5.↵
    Redinbaugh EM, MacCallum RC, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Recurrent syndromal depression in caregivers. Psychol Aging 1995;10:358-68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Schulz R, O'Brien AT, Bookwala J, Fleissner K. Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes. Gerontologist 1995;35:771-91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Whitlatch CJ, Feinberg LF, Sebesta DS. Depression and health in family caregivers: adaptation over time. J Aging Health 1997;9(2):222-43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 1999;282:2215-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Haley WE, LaMonde LA, Han B, Burton AM, Schonwetter R. Predictors of depression and life satisfaction among spousal caregivers in hospice: application of a stress process model. J Palliat Med 2003;6:215-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Rabow MW, Hauser JM, Adams J. Supporting family caregivers at the end of life: “They don't know what they don't know.” JAMA 2004;291:483-91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Sundström G, Johansson L, Hassing LB. The shifting balance of long-term care in Sweden. Gerontologist 2002;42:350-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Haley WE. The costs of family caregiving: implications for geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003;48(2):151-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 170 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 170, Issue 12
8 Jun 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Family care and burden at the end of life
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Family care and burden at the end of life
Steven H. Zarit
CMAJ Jun 2004, 170 (12) 1811-1812; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040196

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Family care and burden at the end of life
Steven H. Zarit
CMAJ Jun 2004, 170 (12) 1811-1812; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040196
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • How can Canada’s health systems improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
  • Minimally invasive procedures in gender-affirming care: the case for public funding across Canada
  • Time for Canada to align with global innovations in treatment for tuberculosis
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Cancer: breast
    • Patient education

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire