Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Winnipeg inquest recommendations watered down, parents say

Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ October 30, 2001 165 (9) 1242-1242-a;
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Seven years after 12 children died in Winnipeg's pediatric cardiac surgery debacle, 3 of the families involved fear the recommendations from the resulting inquest have been “watered down” in the report on their implementation.

The inquest report, which was nearly 6 years in the making (CMAJ 2001;164 [3]: 393), contained 36 recommendations on everything from whistle-blower legislation to the need for widely available physician profiles. Paul Thomas, a professor of political science at the University of Manitoba, had only 4 months to devise a practical plan to implement the recommendations.

Saul Simmonds, the lawyer for the 3 families, says the 51 recommendations in Thomas' plan “could have been written by the doctors. They've all circled their wagons.”

The inquest and the 2 reports that emerged from it relate to pediatric cardiac surgery that took place in 1994 at Winnipeg's Health Sciences Centre. Twelve infants died, for a mortality rate of 29% among high-risk cases; the norm was 11% (CMAJ 1998;159:1285-7). The parents endured 30 months of inquest testimony, then waited 3 years for the inquest report. The process took so long that some of the recommendations are redundant. In fact, the pediatric cardiac program has been shut down — these patients now transferred to Alberta.

Thomas says many of Judge Murray Sinclair's recommendations are “pretty pure and idealistic.” In the original inquest report, he says, Sinclair “didn't test the feasibility of his recommendations,” given Manitoba's “finite resources and other practical limitations.”

“We are a have-less province. Health is 40% of our provincial budget. I know it sounds crass, but we have to be politically and economically realistic.”

Simmonds and his clients are angry at this “glossing over.” He says whistle-blower protection for staff who disclose alleged wrongdoing is a prime example. Instead of implementing legislation, as suggested by Judge Sinclair, Thomas advocates in-hospital disclosure-protection policies that would be reviewed in 5 years. Simmonds says such policies have “no teeth,” but Thomas counters that new evidence from a similar inquest in Bristol, England (CMAJ 2001;165 [5]: 628) indicates that whistle-blower legislation doesn't work. “We don't want symbolic gestures,” Thomas told CMAJ. “We want to implement things that work.”

Thomas also called for a broader, systemic change in the “culture of error,” with the emphasis switching from secrecy to disclosure (CMAJ 2001; 165 [8]:1083).

One of the more contentious recommendations calls for physician profiles, which would include data on a physician's education, work experience, complaints lodged and disciplinary action. Thomas' report supports the creation of profiles, but he agrees that the program would be expensive and might deter physicians from moving to the province.

Thomas says he appreciates the parents' frustration, because in their view no one has been held accountable for the deaths of their children. He says the bottom line is accountability, but instead of blaming a few people he's holding 7 organizations, which must implement his recommendations, accountable. All 7 — 2 government departments, the regional health authority, hospital, nurses' association, College of Physicians and Surgeons and medical examiner — must report their progress by next spring.

The college is prepared to support the call for making physician profiles available to patients or their guardians, but it is concerned about the proposed inclusion of all complaints made to it.

Figure

Figure. Fifteen-month-old Ashton Feakes was 1 of 12 infants whose deaths following cardiac surgery in Winnipeg resulted in a lengthy inquest. Photo by: Canapress

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 165, Issue 9
30 Oct 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Winnipeg inquest recommendations watered down, parents say
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Winnipeg inquest recommendations watered down, parents say
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Oct 2001, 165 (9) 1242-1242-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Winnipeg inquest recommendations watered down, parents say
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Oct 2001, 165 (9) 1242-1242-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire