Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Lyme borreliosis in Ontario: determining the risks

Ian K. Barker and L. Robbin Lindsay
CMAJ May 30, 2000 162 (11) 1573-1574;
Ian K. Barker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Robbin Lindsay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In this issue of CMAJ Satyendra Banerjee and colleagues highlight the possibility of exposure to Lyme borreliosis in Ontario.1 What is the likelihood of encountering the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, the vector of Lyme borreliosis, in eastern Canada? Is this likelihood changing? And what are the implications?

Until recently, the only known Canadian population of I. scapularis was found at Long Point, on the north shore of Lake Erie.2 However, many individual I. scapularis ticks have been found, on people and pets with no history of travel, throughout Saskatchewan, southern Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and the Atlantic provinces.3,4 Such ticks, found at sites where the species is not endemic, are ”adventitious” (coming from without, accidental), having arrived as immature stages on birds migrating from tick-endemic areas to the south.2,5,6

Adventitious ticks may transmit B. burgdorferi if they have previously fed on an infected host.6 Given that only 9 (6.5%) of the 139 adult ticks examined by Banerjee and colleagues carried B. burgdorferi, many probably originated in areas where few hosts were infected. However, in some localities up to about 20% of nymphs,7 which seem most important in transmitting B. burgdorferi to people,8 and more than 50% of adults7 may be infected.

Despite their wide distribution, the density of adventitious ticks in the environment is very low; hence, indigenous Lyme borreliosis is uncommon in Ontario, accounting for 127 of 280 cases of the disease diagnosed in the province between 1981 and 1998 (Charles A. LeBer, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care: personal communication, 1999). Passive surveillance underestimates incidence9 but does permit comparisons of risk. From 1988 to 1998 the highest mean annual incidence of indigenous cases per 100 000 population in Ontario (0.4) was in the northwest, where an outdoor lifestyle may enhance exposure. In the region including Long Point, the annual incidence of indigenous cases for the same period was 0.2 per 100 000 population, whereas in the rest of the province it was 0.1 per 100 000 population. The overall mean annual incidence of Lyme borreliosis in Ontario, including cases acquired out of province, was 0.2 per 100 000 population (Charles A. LeBer: personal communication, 1999). These data are similar to the mean annual incidence per 100 000 over the period 1989 to 1998 in states such as Michigan (0.54 [0.18 in 1998]), Ohio (0.45 [0.42 in 1998]) and Illinois (0.25 [0.12 in 1998]),10 where there are few established populations of I. scapularis. These rates are much lower than the annual incidence where vector populations are widespread and moderately high, such as Minnesota (3.83 [5.66 in 1998]) and Wisconsin (9.29 [12.83 in 1998]), and pale in comparison to data from New York (21.76 [25.51 in 1998]), Connecticut (55.62 [105 in 1998]) and Nantucket County, Massachusetts (more than 1200 in 1996),11 where infected vectors are commonly encountered.

If enough adventitious immature ticks are introduced to an area, some may survive to find a mate and establish a local population. However, given that B. burgdorferi is not transmitted through the tick egg, subsequent generations of ticks will not pose a threat until an infected host, such as a migratory bird, introduces the spirochete into the host‐vector cycle in that locality.

The range of I. scapularis in the United States is expanding.12 Range expansion, and a concomitant local increase in the risk of Lyme borreliosis, is also occurring in Ontario. We have detected recently established populations of I. scapularis at Point Pelee National Park and Rondeau Provincial Park on the north shore of Lake Erie, as well as evidence for other populations at the eastern end of Lake Ontario, all on landfalls for spring migrant birds (unpublished data). Other such populations may remain undetected, as Banerjee and colleagues imply. Identification and communication of the location and extent of new areas of I. scapularis endemicity is required to inform public health education and to assist physicians in evaluating the risk of exposure.

I. scapularis can theoretically become established throughout Ontario south of North Bay, in the Kenora ‐ Rainy River region of northwestern Ontario3 and possibly in parts of southern Manitoba and Quebec. Climatic constraints on development of the various life stages will likely prevent establishment of populations in most of northern Ontario and possibly in the Maritimes and much of Manitoba and Quebec.

Physicians should recognize that exposure to B. burgdorferi, though uncommon, can occur in Canada. The low incidence complicates the diagnosis of an already problematic disease. Canadian primary care physicians can gain little experience with Lyme borreliosis. Unsuspected biting ticks may go unnoticed, and symptoms other than the characteristic erythema migrans rash, which occurs in about 90% of culture-confirmed cases, are nonspecific.13 Because infection is uncommon, first-step serologic tests (indirect fluorescence assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunodot assay) are more likely to produce a false-positive result than a true-positive result.14 The more specific second-step test, Western blotting, should be carried out as a sequel to a positive first-step test.14 Such testing, which is required by the Central Public Health Laboratory in Ontario (Charles A. LeBer: personal communication, 1999), reduces the risk of misdiagnosis on the basis of serologic testing. To detect specific IgG antibodies, Western blotting must be carried out after a month of illness.14,15 A diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis must be based on critical evaluation of all clinical and laboratory data,13,14,15 including any history of exposure to ticks or travel to an area were I. scapularis is endemic.

I. scapularis also transmits Babesia microti, the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, and deer tick virus, which is closely related to Powassan virus but of unknown pathogenicity.16 These agents, which may concurrently infect people with Lyme borreliosis and which do cause disease (although uncommonly) in the Unit ed States, have yet to be recognized in ticks in Canada. However, they may affect travellers.17

I. scapularis is not the most common tick on people and pets in Canada. The more common ticks do not transmit B. burgdorferi,7,18 but they do serve as vectors for other zoonoses. Dermacentor variabilis, found east of central Saskatchewan, and Dermacentor andersoni, found further to the west, transmit Rocky Mountain spotted fever; D. variabilis also transmits Q fever and tularemia.19 Ixodes cookei transmits Powassan virus.20

Simple measures can mitigate the risk of acquiring any tick-borne zoonoses. These include, at the societal level, publicizing areas where ticks are endemic, so that these areas may be avoided or greater vigilance taken by people who do visit them; and, at the individual level, tucking in pant cuffs and wearing long-sleeved shirts; applying DEET-based repellents to clothing and exposed skin; and carefully examining clothing and body for ticks after a day outdoors. The mouthparts of attached ticks should be grasped with forceps at skin level, and the tick slowly withdrawn. Early removal of ticks may diminish the probability of acquiring Lyme borreliosis and other zoonoses.

Current information on Lyme borreliosis, other than Canadian epidemiology, is readily accessible at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Lyme disease Web site (www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/lymeinfo.htm).

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Banerjee SN, Banerjee M, Fernando K, Scott JD, Mann R, Morshed MG. Presence of spirochete causing Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, in the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, in southern Ontario. CMAJ 2000; 162(11):1567-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Barker IK, Surgeoner GA, Artsob H, McEwen SA, Elliott LA, Campbell GD, et al. Distribution of the Lyme disease vector, Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) and isolation of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ontario, Canada. J Med Entomol 1992; 29:1011-22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Lindsay LR, Barker IK, Surgeoner GA, McEwen SA, Gillespie TJ, Robinson JT. Survival and development of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) under various climatic conditions in Ontario, Canada. J Med Entomol 1995;32:143-52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Lindsay R, Artsob H, Galloway T, Horsman G. Vector of Lyme borreliosis, Ixodes scapularis, identified in Saskatchewan. Can Commun Dis Rep 1999;25:81-3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Klich M, Lankester MW, Wu KW. Spring migratory birds (Aves) extend the northern occurrence of blacklegged tick (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 1996;33:581-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Morshed MG, Scott JD, Banerjee SN, Banerjee M, Fitzgerald T, Fernando K, et al. First isolation of Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, from blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, removed from a bird in Nova Scotia, Canada. Can Commun Dis Rep 1999;25:153-5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Lindsay LR, Barker IK, Surgeoner GA, McEwen SA, Elliott LA, Kolar J. Apparent incompetence of Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae) and fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) as vectors of Borrelia burgdorferi in an Ixodes dammini endemic area of Ontario, Canada. J Med Entomol 1991;28:750-3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Falco RC, McKenna DF, Daniels TJ, Nadelman RB, Nowakowski J, Fish D, et al. Temporal relation between Ixodes scapularis abundance and risk for Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149:771-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Campbell GL, Fritz CL, Fish D, Nowakowski J, Nadelman RB, Wormser GP. Estimation of the incidence of Lyme disease. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148: 1018-26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases. Lyme disease: epidemiology [online publication]. Atlanta: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; updated 1999 Oct 8. Available: www.cdc.gov./ncidod/dvbid/lymeepi.htm (accessed 2000 Apr 6).
  11. 11.↵
    US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme disease — United States, 1996. MMWR 1997;46:531-5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Dennis DT, Nekomoto TS, Victor JC, Paul WS, Piesman J. Reported distribution of Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) in the United States. J Med Entomol 1998;35:629-38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Nadelman RB, Wormser GP. Lyme borreliosis. Lancet 1998;352:557-65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Brown SL, Hansen SL, Langone JJ. Role of serology in the diagnosis of Lyme disease. JAMA 1999;282:62-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Wormser GP, Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Nadelman RB. Lyme disease serology: problems and opportunities. JAMA 1999;282:79-80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Ebel GD, Foppa I, Spielman A, Telford SR 3rd. A focus of deer tick virus transmission in the northcentral United States. Emerg Infect Dis 1999;5(4):570-4 [serial online]. Available: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol5no4 /ebel.htm (accessed 2000 Apr 6).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Dos Santos CC, Kain KC. Two tick-borne diseases in one: a case report of concurrent babesiosis and Lyme disease in Ontario. CMAJ 1999;160:1851-3. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-160/issue-13/1851.htm
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Barker IK, Lindsay LR, Campbell GD, Surgeoner GA, McEwen SA. The groundhog tick Ixodes cookei (Acari: Ixodidae): a poor potential vector of Lyme borreliosis. J Wildl Dis 1993;29:416-22.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. 19.↵
    Artsob H. Tick-transmitted human disease threats in Canada. Germs Ideas 1996;2:35-9.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Gholam BIA, Puksa S, Provias JP. Powassan encephalitis: a case report with neuropathology and literature review. CMAJ 1999;161:1419-22. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-161/issue-11/1419.htm
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

CMAJ
Vol. 162, Issue 11
30 May 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lyme borreliosis in Ontario: determining the risks
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Lyme borreliosis in Ontario: determining the risks
Ian K. Barker, L. Robbin Lindsay
CMAJ May 2000, 162 (11) 1573-1574;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Lyme borreliosis in Ontario: determining the risks
Ian K. Barker, L. Robbin Lindsay
CMAJ May 2000, 162 (11) 1573-1574;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia (pseudolymphoma)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Antiracism as a foundational competency: reimagining CanMEDS through an antiracist lens
  • Keeping the front door open: ensuring access to primary care for all in Canada
  • Improving post-tuberculosis care in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire