Advertisement
ADVANCED SEARCH

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Doorslaer, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Doorslaer, E. Related Collections Organization of health care Other medicare Related Article

Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries

From the Department of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands (van Doorslaer, Masseria, Koolman); and the London School of Economics, London, UK (Masseria)

Correspondence to: Dr. Eddy van Doorslaer, Department of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands; e.vandoorslaer{at}erasmusmc.nl

Background: Most of the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) aim to ensure equitable access to health care. This is often interpreted as requiring that care be available on the basis of need and not willingness or ability to pay. We sought to examine equity in physician utilization in 21 OECD countries for the year 2000.

Methods: Using data from national surveys or from the European Community Household Panel, we extracted the number of visits to a general practitioner or medical specialist over the previous 12 months. Visits were standardized for need differences using age, sex and reported health levels as proxies. We measured inequity in doctor utilization by income using concentration indices of the need-standardized use.

Results: We found inequity in physician utilization favouring patients who are better off in about half of the OECD countries studied. The degree of pro-rich inequity in doctor use is highest in the United States and Mexico, followed by Finland, Portugal and Sweden. In most countries, we found no evidence of inequity in the distribution of general practitioner visits across income groups, and where it does occur, it often indicates a pro-poor distribution. However, in all countries for which data are available, after controlling for need differences, people with higher incomes are significantly more likely to see a specialist than people with lower incomes and, in most countries, also more frequently. Pro-rich inequity is especially large in Portugal, Finland and Ireland.

Interpretation: Although in most OECD countries general practitioner care is distributed fairly equally and is often even pro-poor, the very pro-rich distribution of specialist care tends to make total doctor utilization somewhat pro-rich. This phenomenon appears to be universal, but it is reinforced when private insurance or private care options are offered.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. K. Glass, D. L. Pearl, S. A. McEwen, and R. Finley Canadian province-level risk factor analysis of macrolide consumption patterns (2000-2006) J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2010; 65(1): 148 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Burstrom Will Swedish healthcare reforms affect equity? BMJ, December 22, 2009; 339(dec22_2): b4566 - b4566. [Full Text]

				C. Wendt Mapping European healthcare systems: a comparative analysis of financing, service provision and access to healthcare Journal of European Social Policy, December 1, 2009; 19(5): 432 - 445. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Starfield Commentary: How does 'insurance' improve equity in health? Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2009; 38(6): 1551 - 1553. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Avendano, H. Jurges, and J. P. Mackenbach Educational level and changes in health across Europe: longitudinal results from SHARE Journal of European Social Policy, October 1, 2009; 19(4): 301 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. H. Glazier, M. M. Agha, R. Moineddin, and L. M. Sibley Universal Health Insurance and Equity in Primary Care and Specialist Office Visits: A Population-Based Study Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2009; 7(5): 396 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I Andersen, K Thielen, E Nygaard, and F Diderichsen Social inequality in the prevalence of depressive disorders J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2009; 63(7): 575 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Wang, A. Guttmann, T. To, and P. T. Dick Neighborhood Income and Health Outcomes in Infants: How Do Those With Complex Chronic Conditions Fare? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2009; 163(7): 608 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Manderbacka, M. Arffman, A. Leyland, A. Mccallum, and I. Keskimaki Change and persistence in healthcare inequities: Access to elective surgery in Finland in 1992--2003 Scand J Public Health, March 1, 2009; 37(2): 131 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. E. Kruk, M. R. Prescott, and S. Galea Equity of Skilled Birth Attendant Utilization in Developing Countries: Financing and Policy Determinants Am J Public Health, January 1, 2008; 98(1): 142 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Starfield and A.-E. Birn Income redistribution is not enough: income inequality, social welfare programs, and achieving equity in health J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2007; 61(12): 1038 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Lostao, E. Regidor, S. Geyer, and P. Aiach Patient cost sharing and physician visits by socioeconomic position: findings in three Western European countries J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2007; 61(5): 416 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. O'Donnell, E. van Doorslaer, R. P. Rannan-Eliya, A. Somanathan, S. R. Adhikari, D. Harbianto, C. C. Garg, P. Hanvoravongchai, M. N. Huq, A. Karan, et al. The Incidence of Public Spending on Healthcare: Comparative Evidence from Asia World Bank Econ. Rev., January 24, 2007; (2007) lhl009v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Murray Poverty and health. Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 28, 2006; 174(7): 923 - 923. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Election promises: moving beyond health care Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 17, 2006; 174(2): 137 - 137. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Promesses electorales : au-dela des soins de sante Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 17, 2006; 174(2): 139 - 139. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hurley and M. Grignon Income and equity of access to physician services Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 17, 2006; 174(2): 187 - 188. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

HOME	CURRENT ISSUE	PAST ISSUES	COLLECTIONS	HELP	SEARCH
Copyright 1995-2006, Canadian Medical Association. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p) All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.