Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Viral misinformation threatens public health

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ December 18, 2017 189 (50) E1567; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5536
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Outbreaks of fake news and distorted evidence are threatening the biggest public health achievements of the past century, warns Dr. Brittany Seymour, an assistant professor of oral health policy and epidemiology at Harvard University. But mapping these “digital pandemics” is giving researchers a better idea of how to set the record straight.

A mind-blowing amount of information is shared on the internet, Seymour explained at a recent Ontario Public Health Association forum. Faced with information overload, “objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.”

With 80% of people seeking health information online, viral misinformation poses a growing threat to public health, she said. “One of the best examples is vaccines.” In 2014, the United States had one of the largest measles outbreaks in a generation. “We’ve been able to trace that, in part, to parents who found scary information on the Internet and opted not to vaccinate their children,” Seymour said. Despite researchers and institutions issuing corrective information, “counter efforts have not been as effective as we’d like.” Three years on, “we see the Centers for Disease Control responding to a whole list of concerns related to the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccination,” she said.

Meanwhile, there is growing controversy around water fluoridation, spurred by a 2014 study with “severe limitations” that linked the chemical to lower IQs in children. “Within a matter of hours from its release, the article created a flood of posts on Twitter, and was covered in pop media news stories across the Internet, generating tens of thousands of views and shares,” Seymour said. Her research mapping these online conversations reveals that “similar to the anti-vaccination community, a small but vocal and very tightly knit network is likely driving the anti-fluoridation lobby.”

Figure1

Information overload is driving people to trust social influence over evidence on health matters.

Image courtesy of diego_cervo/iStock

Highly connected networks have strict sets of social norms and quickly reject any dissenter or contradictory piece of evidence, Seymour explained. Members frequently share and cite studies to back their arguments, but often the studies were not linked to or were several clicks away, and “the risk of evidence becoming misrepresented increases with each link that takes the reader further from the original article,” she said.

Curiously, the public health community clusters together in a similar way, Seymour added. “We really like each other and link to each other a lot, but we’re not getting engagement beyond our own echo chamber.”

Targeting social influencers — the members of networks with the most ties to different social clusters — may help cross that divide. This is already happening organically, she noted, citing the example of a Connecticut dentist promoting a “back to school” checklist that included a dental check-up. “Rather than tweeting it out to her own followers on Twitter, she tweeted at a very influential mom group, and the mom in charge retweeted the checklist,” Seymour said. “That’s the way we need to start thinking about how we communicate and who we target.”

It’s similar to the approach the Harvard School of Public Health used in the 1980s to reduce drunk driving by getting television shows like Cheers to popularize the concept of a “designated driver,” she added. “They didn’t show statistics; they created a social norm, and not only did we see a drastic reduction in alcohol-related accidents and deaths, but ‘designated driver’ became a household term.”

As the balance of influence has shifted from broadcasters to individuals, public health must also shift “from how can we get evidence-based information to our target audience, to how we can get our audience to share our evidence-based information.”

Footnotes

  • Posted on cmajnews.com on Nov. 30, 2017.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (50)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 50
18 Dec 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Viral misinformation threatens public health
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Viral misinformation threatens public health
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Dec 2017, 189 (50) E1567; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5536

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Viral misinformation threatens public health
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Dec 2017, 189 (50) E1567; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5536
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • COVID-19 prevention and treatment information on the internet: a systematic analysis and quality assessment
  • Fake medical news: avoiding pitfalls and perils
  • Containing health myths in the age of viral misinformation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Canada’s long road to a vaccine injury compensation program
  • Health advocates want help handling online harassment
  • Reconciliation in health care must go beyond cultural sensitivity
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Vaccination
    • Public health
    • Patient education

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire