Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Virtual links to the emergency department

Eddy Lang, Marc Afilalo and Ruth Leger
CMAJ July 18, 2006 175 (2) 174; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1060115
Eddy Lang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Afilalo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth Leger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

[Three of the authors respond:]

We welcome the comments of Dr. Muldoon and could not agree more with her perspective. As an ED-led research initiative, the primary study outcome that was emphasized related to factors that impacted the most on ED functioning and resource utilization.1 Although these results were disappointing, we also measured the impact of the electronic link on measures of continuity of care such as family physician confidence and management plans as enhanced by the information received and general measures of physician satisfaction. These results are very favourable.

We also are thankful for Dr. Greiver and Dr. Eysenbach's astute observations. We have extensive data on the utilization of the electronic communication tool by the 23 family physicians recruited in the study. Our information is derived from electronic log-in records and informs us about the number of times that each patient report was accessed by the intended family physician recipient. Overall, physicians accessed these reports 2.1 times per patient visit. Subsequent log-ins were frequently needed as email updates would be sent out if a pending result became available (e.g., a bacterial culture). In our view, this represents a moderate to high level of utilization of the application. We agree that the sheer volume of patients that community family physicians in our busy urban setting have to manage may preclude an effective change in practice resulting from electronic linkage information. Unfortunately, reduced access to primary care physicians has created a new normal in practice size for many physicians, and it is our view that if this intervention's impact on resource use cannot be appreciated when family physicians are receiving several reports a month on their most needy patients we are doubtful that an impact would be measurable if the reports were issued only a few times a year.

REFERENCE

  1. 1.
    Lang E, Afilalo M, Vandal AC, et al. Impact of an electronic link between the emergency department and family physicians: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2006;174(3):313-8.

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire