Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Job strain and lifestyle factors

BongKyoo Choi, Marnie Dobson, Sangbaek Ko and Paul Landsbergis
CMAJ January 07, 2014 186 (1) 63-64; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.114-0003
BongKyoo Choi
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (Choi, Dobson, Ko), University of California, Irvine, Calif.; Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine (Ko), Wonju, South Korea; Downstate School of Public Health (Landsbergis), State University of New York, New York, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marnie Dobson
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (Choi, Dobson, Ko), University of California, Irvine, Calif.; Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine (Ko), Wonju, South Korea; Downstate School of Public Health (Landsbergis), State University of New York, New York, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sangbaek Ko
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (Choi, Dobson, Ko), University of California, Irvine, Calif.; Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine (Ko), Wonju, South Korea; Downstate School of Public Health (Landsbergis), State University of New York, New York, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Landsbergis
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (Choi, Dobson, Ko), University of California, Irvine, Calif.; Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine (Ko), Wonju, South Korea; Downstate School of Public Health (Landsbergis), State University of New York, New York, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

The article by Kivimäki and colleagues1 includes several methodological and interpretational errors.

First, we believe the authors should have excluded obesity from their definition of an unhealthy lifestyle. The authors defined an unhealthy lifestyle arbitrarily as a combination of the following four risk factors of coronary artery disease: smoking, heavy drinking, leisure-time physical inactivity and obesity. Although the first three risk factors may be considered lifestyle risk factors, obesity has a multifactorial etiology and cannot be simplistically labelled a lifestyle risk factor. Therefore, the study’s results likely overestimate the effect of an “unhealthy lifestyle” on coronary artery disease.

Second, the authors should have made clear that two of the three behavioural risk factors (heavy drinking and leisure-time physical inactivity) did not offset the impact of job strain on coronary artery disease. Figure 1 in the article by Kivimäki and colleagues1 indicates that there would be no significant reduction in the risk of coronary artery disease from reducing heavy drinking behaviour or physical inactivity among workers with job strain. Rather, it indicates the importance of addressing both job strain and unhealthy behavioural risk factors for prevention of coronary artery disease. Emerging evidence shows that organizational- or task-level interventions for increasing job control and decreasing high job demands can be beneficial for the health of workers and organizations.2,3

Third, the conclusion of the authors (“a healthy lifestyle may substantially reduce disease risk among people with job strain”) is misleading; 84.3% of workers with job strain had none or only one of the four risk factors, and in this group there was no significant effect modification of any one of the four risk factors on the association between job strain and coronary artery disease. Therefore, the conclusion is irrelevant for the majority of the workers with job strain. Job strain, an adverse working condition, may be a structural barrier that keeps workers from adopting and maintaining healthy behaviours as implied in another article4 by the same research group.

Last, throughout the article, the authors equate job strain with perceived work stress or work stressors in general. The authors inappropriately compared the effects of perceived work stress (i.e., how often participants felt stress at work) in the INTERHEART study with job strain in their study.1 Equating job strain with work stressors in general ignores other important work stressors (i.e., poor workplace social support, job insecurity, long work hours, and effort–reward imbalance) that have been associated with cardiovascular disease.5

References

    1. Kivimäki M,
    2. Nyberg ST,
    3. Fransson EI,
    4. et al
    . Associations of job strain and lifestyle risk factors with risk of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. CMAJ 2013;185:763–9.
    1. Egan M,
    2. Bambra C,
    3. Thomas S,
    4. et al
    . The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 1. A systematic review of organisational-level interventions that aim to increase employee control. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61: 945–54.
    1. Bambra C,
    2. Egan M,
    3. Thomas S,
    4. et al
    . The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 2. A systematic review of task restructuring interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:1028–37.
    1. Fransson EI,
    2. Heikkilä K,
    3. Nyberg ST,
    4. et al
    . Job strain as a risk factor for leisure-time physical inactivity: an individual-participant meta-analysis of up to 170,000 men and women The IPD-Work Consortium. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176:1078–89.
    1. Choi B,
    2. Schnall P,
    3. Ko S,
    4. et al
    . Job strain and coronary heart disease [letter]. Lancet 2013;381:448.

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire