Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Reducing the rates of inappropriate labour induction

Susan Harris, Stefan Grzybowski and Patti Janssen
CMAJ April 17, 2001 164 (8) 1128-1129;
Susan Harris
Medical Program Director The Birthing Program British Columbia's Women's Hospital and Health Centre Vancouver, BC; Director of Research Department of Family Practice University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC; Epidemiologist Centre for Evaluation Services British Columbia's Women's Hospital and Health Centre Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Grzybowski
Medical Program Director The Birthing Program British Columbia's Women's Hospital and Health Centre Vancouver, BC; Director of Research Department of Family Practice University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC; Epidemiologist Centre for Evaluation Services British Columbia's Women's Hospital and Health Centre Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patti Janssen
Medical Program Director The Birthing Program British Columbia's Women's Hospital and Health Centre Vancouver, BC; Director of Research Department of Family Practice University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC; Epidemiologist Centre for Evaluation Services British Columbia's Women's Hospital and Health Centre Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

We appreciate the response to our paper1 from Craig Ramsay and colleagues; we reached a conclusion similar to theirs when we initially analysed the data, recognizing that induction rates were already declining when we implemented the intervention. We did include statistical testing in early drafts of the paper but this information was omitted at the editors' request. Table 1 shows how logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for induction with the first time period (January–June 1994) as the reference category. The odds of having an induction in 1997 and 1998 were significantly less than in the reference time period; in contrast, the odds of having an induction in the time periods before 1997 did not differ from those in the reference time period.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1.

We then created a logistic regression model with time periods 1, 2, … 10 entered as a continuous variable, which allowed us to compare the slope of the change in the induction rate for different groups of time periods. The slope of the change in induction rate for the period January 1994 to June 1996 is not different from that for July 1996 to December 1998. However, the induction rate appears to have stabilized after December 1997. If the slope for January 1994 to June 1996 is compared with that for July 1996 to December 1997, the p value for the difference in slopes is between 0.05 and 0.1. This finding is in agreement with the analysis presented by Ramsay and colleagues. What is perhaps most interesting is that 3 years post-intervention the rate has not returned to pre-intervention levels.

We did not undertake a cost–benefit analysis. We hope that other investigators will build upon our work by mounting a randomized controlled trial of an accelerated quality improvement process to reduce hospital induction rates.2

References

  1. 1.
    Harris S, Buchinski B, Grzybowski S, Janssen P, Mitchell GWE, Farquharson D. Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care. CMAJ 2000;163(9):1163-6.
  2. 2.
    O'Malley S. Total quality now! Putting QI on the fast track. Qual Lett Healthc Lead 1997; 9(11):2-10.

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire