Louis wasn't the cocktail party type, but attending this gathering at the faculty club seemed more or less obligatory. He stood for a moment, noncommittally, in the doorway of the reception room. Conversations, mainly shop talk, were going on everywhere, and he wondered what the buzz words of the evening would be: cutbacks, restructuring, staffing? The evening was bound to be a drag. Then, to his relief, he spotted two of his cronies toward the back of the room: George and Joanne, from the family medicine clinic where he practised. You could always get a lively conversation out of George and Joanne, not least because they never agreed with one another. He worked his way across the room toward them. From the cluster of people where they were standing, he caught the word "evidence." Oh no, he thought, this is going to be worse than I thought.
It seemed that they'd latched onto a discussion of the state of family medicine. "I want to practise evidence-based care," Joanne was saying, "and I try. But it isn't feasible. It takes me half an hour to explain to a patient why I shouldn't give him antibiotics for his cold, but it only takes me two minutes to look at his throat and give him a prescription." Only half joking, she added: "I can't afford not to prescribe antibiotics." And then, more seriously: "Besides, half the time the cold turns into bronchitis and I end up prescribing antibiotics anyway."
"Right," said a voice from behind Louis' shoulder. He turned to face a woman he vaguely remembered meeting before. Margaret something-or-other. But George was already tossing in his two cents: "Using antibiotics for viral infections is a waste of money that could be better used elsewhere, to say nothing of the danger of promoting antibiotic-resistant bacteria."
"Right again," said Margaret.
Louis couldn't resist challenging her. "They can't both be right," he said. "You either should use antibiotics for a cold, or you shouldn't."
"Two rights don't make a wrong," she replied, smiling.
"All right," he said, "we're game. Expand and elucidate."
"George is certainly right. It's not always better to do something rather than nothing. Bloodletting used to be the cure-all; it remained popular for three centuries. In our day it's antibiotics. A sloppy term - at least we should call them antibacterials. And who knows if they'll be able to fight bacteria either, much longer. The facts are clear. Antibiotics are used for more than half the patients who consult doctors for upper respiratory infections,1 although there is little if any evidence that they do any good."2
Louis couldn't let her get away with that. "I know what the literature says, but it's clear to me in my practice that antibiotics sometimes do work for upper respiratory infections."
Margaret conceded. "Antibiotics are not always useless, of course. For example, they shorten the duration of symptoms for the 20% of patients with positive cultures for Haemophilus influenzae.3 But it's not practical to culture everybody. Cultures are too cumbersome, too slow, and too expensive for routine use. Antibiotics are not helpful for the 80% of patients with negative cultures, so until you get a rapid and inexpensive way to identify the subgroups with bacterial infections, using antibiotics doesn't make sense."
George reckoned that he had won the argument. "The spectre of antibiotic-resistant organisms is frightening," he put in. "It's already a significant problem, and it's getting worse.4 It may be even more threatening to the human species than global warming, which we also seem to be ignoring."5
But Margaret wouldn't let him gloat. "But Joanne is right, too. It's usually better to do something than nothing. A busy office is no place to start an education program. Patients who are feeling miserable don't want a lecture or a platitude. They want something to be done, and they want it now. A good family doctor knows what her patients want and need."
Then she turned to Louis. "So they are both right. When a patient comes in feeling miserable, he needs treatment. Why not try something that seems to work and doesn't carry the risk of treatment with antibiotics? Zinc lozenges, for instance, in adequate doses can cut the duration of cold symptoms almost in half.6 Other treatments seem to be effective too, and if the benefits are partly placebo, that's all to the good.7-10 So all of you are right. Your positions may be irreconcilable, but it's easier to reconcile the irreconcilable than to unscrew the inscrutable."
With that rather inscrutable comment, Margaret took another sip of her gin and tonic and set off in the direction of the cheese tray.
Competing interests: None.
Acknowledgments
Your #1 Online Resource for Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines
One-stop access to more than 2000 Canadian CPGs
Your free link to better patient care
The Infobase is made possible in part by unrestricted educational grants from AstraZeneca, Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Merck Frosst Canada Inc. and Pfizer Canada Inc.
Footnotes
-
See related article page 1826
This is the first in a projected series of stories that illustrate contemporary approaches to clinical problem solving and knowledge management.
Reprint requests to: Dr. A.R. Jadad, Health Information Research Unit, 3H7, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main St. West, Hamilton ON L8N 3Z5; fax 905 546-0401; jadada{at}fhs.mcmaster.ca