Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies

…, AS Skou Thomsen, J Hilden… - International journal …, 2014 - academic.oup.com
Background: Blinding patients in clinical trials is a key methodological procedure, but the
expected degree of bias due to nonblinded patients on estimated treatment effects is unknown. …

Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review

AW Jørgensen, J Hilden, PC Gøtzsche - Bmj, 2006 - bmj.com
Objective To compare the methodological quality and conclusions in Cochrane reviews with
those in industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs. …

Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials

…, A Hrobjartsson, KJ Jørgensen, J Hilden… - International journal …, 2007 - academic.oup.com
Background Randomized trials without reported adequate allocation concealment have
been shown to overestimate the benefit of experimental interventions. We investigated the …

Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors

…, ASS Thomsen, F Emanuelsson, B Tendal, J Hilden… - Cmaj, 2013 - Can Med Assoc
Background: Clinical trials are commonly done without blinded outcome assessors despite
the risk of bias. We wanted to evaluate the effect of nonblinded outcome assessment on …

Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors

…, ASS Thomsen, F Emanuelsson, B Tendal, J Hilden… - Bmj, 2012 - bmj.com
Objective To evaluate the impact of non-blinded outcome assessment on estimated treatment
effects in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes. Design Systematic review of …

[HTML][HTML] Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain

MF Olsen, E Bjerre, MD Hansen, J Hilden, NE Landler… - BMC medicine, 2017 - Springer
Background The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is used to interpret the clinical
relevance of results reported by trials and meta-analyses as well as to plan sample sizes …

The area under the ROC curve and its competitors

J Hilden - Medical Decision Making, 1991 - journals.sagepub.com
The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a popular measure of the
power of a (two-disease) diagnostic test, but it is shown here to be an inconsistent criterion: …

Randomised placebo controlled multicentre trial to assess short term clarithromycin for patients with stable coronary heart disease: CLARICOR trial

…, S Hansen, OH Helø, P Hildebrandt, J Hilden… - Bmj, 2006 - bmj.com
Objective To determine if the macrolide clarithromycin affects mortality and cardiovascular
morbidity in patients with stable coronary heart disease. Design Centrally randomised …

Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's Index

J Hilden, P Glasziou - Statistics in medicine, 1996 - Wiley Online Library
Regret is the difference in outcome between the action we took and the best action we could,
in retrospect, have taken. ‘Tent graphs’, representing decision problems under uncertainty …

A note on the evaluation of novel biomarkers: do not rely on integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index

J Hilden, TA Gerds - Statistics in medicine, 2014 - Wiley Online Library
The ‘integrated discrimination improvement’ (IDI) and the ‘net reclassification index’ (NRI) are
statistics proposed as measures of the incremental prognostic impact that a new biomarker …