User profiles for A. D. Oxman
 | Andrew D OxmanNorwegian Institute of Public Health Verified email at online.no Cited by 218233 |
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
… Andrew D Oxman, researcher2, … The members of the GRADE Working Group are Phil
Alderson, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Jeff Andrews, David Atkins, Hilda Bastian, Hans de Beer …
Alderson, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Jeff Andrews, David Atkins, Hilda Bastian, Hans de Beer …
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
…, M Johansen, J Grimshaw, AD Oxman - Cochrane database …, 2012 - cochranelibrary.com
Background Audit and feedback is widely used as a strategy to improve professional practice
either on its own or as a component of multifaceted quality improvement interventions. This …
either on its own or as a component of multifaceted quality improvement interventions. This …
Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies
Objective. —To review the literature relating to the effectiveness of education strategies
designed to change physician performance and health care outcomes. Data Sources. —We …
designed to change physician performance and health care outcomes. Data Sources. —We …
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies
four categories—high, moderate, low, and very low—that are applied to a body of evidence…
four categories—high, moderate, low, and very low—that are applied to a body of evidence…
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations
Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating quality of …
Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating quality of …
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the
effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s …
effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s …
Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings
… Oxman et al identified 102 randomised or quasirandomised controlled trials involving 160
… The review by Oxman et al identified studies involving 12 comparisons of educational …
… The review by Oxman et al identified studies involving 12 comparisons of educational …
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
The “Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation” (GRADE)
approach provides guidance for rating quality of evidence and grading strength of …
approach provides guidance for rating quality of evidence and grading strength of …
What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
… Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. CMAJ 1988;138:697-703. …
Schunemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in …
Schunemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in …
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
In the GRADE approach, randomized trials start as high-quality evidence and observational
studies as low-quality evidence, but both can be rated down if most of the relevant evidence …
studies as low-quality evidence, but both can be rated down if most of the relevant evidence …