[HTML][HTML] Efficacy of face masks and respirators in preventing upper respiratory tract bacterial colonization and co-infection in hospital healthcare workers
Preventive medicine, 2014•Elsevier
Objective We compared the efficacy of medical masks (MM) and N95 respirators (N95) in
preventing bacterial colonization/infection in healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods A cluster
randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 1441 hospital HCWs randomized to medical masks or N95
respirators, and compared to 481 control HCWs, was performed in Beijing, China, during the
winter season of 2008–2009. Participants were followed for development of clinical
respiratory illness (CRI). Symptomatic subjects were tested for Streptococcus pneumoniae …
preventing bacterial colonization/infection in healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods A cluster
randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 1441 hospital HCWs randomized to medical masks or N95
respirators, and compared to 481 control HCWs, was performed in Beijing, China, during the
winter season of 2008–2009. Participants were followed for development of clinical
respiratory illness (CRI). Symptomatic subjects were tested for Streptococcus pneumoniae …
Objective
We compared the efficacy of medical masks (MM) and N95 respirators (N95) in preventing bacterial colonization/infection in healthcare workers (HCWs).
Methods
A cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 1441 hospital HCWs randomized to medical masks or N95 respirators, and compared to 481 control HCWs, was performed in Beijing, China, during the winter season of 2008–2009. Participants were followed for development of clinical respiratory illness (CRI). Symptomatic subjects were tested for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae or Haemophilus influenza type B by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Results
The rate of bacterial colonization was 2.8% in the N95 group (p = 0.02), 5.3% among medical mask users (p < 0.01) and 7.5% among the controls (p = 0.16). N95 respirators were significantly protective (adjusted RR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21–0.56) against bacterial colonization. Co-infections of two bacteria or a virus and bacteria occurred in up to 3.7% of HCWs, and were significantly lower in the N95 arm.
Conclusions
N95 respirators were significantly protective against bacterial colonization, co-colonization and viral-bacterial co-infection. We showed that dual respiratory virus or bacterial-viral co-infections can be reduced by the use of N95 respirators. This study has occupational health and safety implications for health workers.
Elsevier