More Letters to the Editor

DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
Zarfas: This is just a quick rejoinder to the letter of examiner Brian M. Burn printed in the
August 19, 1993 journal. In that letter he suggests that there should be a comparison of patent …

Hobgoblin of Foolish Consistency," 75 JPTOS 823 (1993) Dear Mr. Zarfas: Mr. Collins implies that the different rules for obtaining the benefit of the filing date of a prior …

DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
February 1994 Letters to the Editor 117 the second party's patent serves as a non-antedatable
35 USC 102 (e) reference rendering all of the first party's claims unpatentable because …

Letters & Comment to the Editor

DM Zarfas - Newport - HeinOnline
As a career Inventor and now a registered US Patent Attorney, it is with great misgivings that
I have observed the treatment of independent inventors over the years. Although we give lip …

or, more likely, the term will be construed differently in the two situ-ations (which will tend to produce confusion in both situations). As I have previously advocated, it …

CL Gholz, DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
Zarfas: Regarding the issue of the 35 USC 102 (e) date for a patent derived from an
international application filed at the USPTO, and in particular, the letter from Messrs. Neifeld and …

Re: Morgan, Some Quality Questions Re the Testing of Obviousness and Non-Literal Infringement, 76 JPTOS 719 (1994) Dear Mr. Zarfas: T n the above comment, Mr …

DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
Zarfas: Thank you very much for publishing my "letter to the Editor" at 76 JPTOS 726, partially
provoked by the PTO's recent "Request for Comments on the Standard of Nonobviousness"…

make the combination. The motivation is provided simply by the desire to take advantage of the known functions of the old elements. Sincerely yours, Alan P. Klein …

DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
Zarfas: I read with interest the article by James W. Badie "Motivation or Obvious to Try - Is …
Zarfas: Perhaps a good system would be one which maintains first-toinvent but which reforms …

Very truly yours

CL Gholz, DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
Dr. Noonan's article initially encouraged me with its informative history of patent protection
for medical and surgical procedures; the strong policy arguments for continuing it; specific …

a manufacturer's trademark in the shop's business name, even with the qualifier" Independent." Compare VWAG v. Smith, All F. Supp. 385, 389 (DNM 1979)(" …

JT Carmichael, DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
Zarfas: This letter is prompted by the interesting article by Ellsworth H. Mosher in the May …
Zarfas: Mr. Sher's letter, pages 341-343 of the May, 1992, Journal, presumes to answer an …

Greenberg v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., 91 F. 3d 1580, 39 USPQ 2d 1783 (Fed. Cir. 1996), York Products Inc. v. Central Tractor Farm & Family Center, No. 96-1002 …

LB Goodwin, DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
374 Letters to the Editor JPTOS any decision of the PTO, under present law, and then
determine what is the binding case law for those courts. Thus, except for decisions of the CCPA …

Re: Patent Harmonization, Protectionism, and Legislation Fleecing The Golden Fleece Dear Mr. Zarfas: The two lead articles in the November 1992 JPTOS leave no …

DM Zarfas - HeinOnline
Zarfas, I read with interest Mr. Banner's article in the November 1992 Journal and felt that
comment upon it is necessary. In response to the now-obligatory attack upon the fee increases, …