Background: This study compares central venous catheters (CVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) for indications for insertion, complications, and economic impact.
Methods: A retrospective review of 838 (283 CVC, 555 PICC) consecutively placed venous catheters reflected 49,365 CVC and 11,814 PICC days.
Results: There were 57 (20%) complications in the CVC group, 197 (35%) complications in the PICC group. PICC were associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of catheter malfunction (P = 0.0005), arm vein phlebitis (P = 0.0004), and overall complications (P = 0.00001). A higher complication rate was noted in PICC inserted for chemotherapy (P = 0.00001) and parenteral hyperalimentation administration (P = 0.04). Charges for inpatient insertion of PICC and CVC were $500 and $2,500, respectively.
Conclusions: PICC have a significantly higher complication rate than CVC. PICC provide cost-effective central access of 2 to 3 weeks' duration, reserving operatively placed CVC for longer access requirements.