Background: The role of ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis in an era of minimally invasive therapy continues to be defined.
Methods: We evaluated prospectively the pattern of liver test abnormalities and yield of cholangiography after presentation with illnesses suggesting choledocholithiasis. Ninety-four consecutive patients, all with liver test abnormalities (total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AST, and ALT) at presentation, had serial determinations to within 24 hours of cholangiography and were divided into four groups based on their patterns of rise or fall of liver test results as well as presenting clinical syndrome. Group I: normalized liver tests; Group II: falling liver tests, and alkaline phosphatase falling greater than 50% of the difference between presentation value and upper limit of normal; Group III: alkaline phosphatase falling less than 50%; and Group IV: any liver test with increasing levels. Clinical syndromes included cholangitis, pancreatitis, combined cholangitis and pancreatitis, and biliary pain with abnormal liver tests.
Results: Yields of choledocholithiasis were 13% (Group I), 50% (Group II), 67% (Group III), and 94% (Group IV). Yield by syndromes were 36% (biliary pancreatitis), 72% (biliary pain and abnormal liver tests), 87% (cholangitis), and 100% (cholangitis and pancreatitis).
Conclusion: The degree of decline in liver test levels is inversely related to the yield of cholangiography in symptomatic choledocholithiasis; the yield of ERCP in these patients (with normalized liver tests) is low and they do not require ERCP. Pre-ERCP estimates of the likelihood of choledocholithiasis can be made on the basis of the pattern of liver tests, and biliary pancreatitis patients with normalized liver tests do not require ERCP.