Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones

Lancet. 1988 Oct 29;2(8618):979-83. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90740-4.

Abstract

121 patients with acute pancreatitis thought to be due to gallstones were randomised to treatment with urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) or with conventional treatment. They were stratified by predicted severity of the attack, according to the modified Glasgow system. ERCP was done within 72 h, and if common bileduct stones were identified, patients underwent ES immediately to extract the stones. There were fewer complications in the 59 patients who underwent ERCP +/- ES than among the 62 treated conventionally, the difference being confined to those whose attacks were predicted to be severe (6/25 ERCP +/- ES [1 death] compared with 17/28 conventional treatment [5 deaths]). Hospital stay was also shorter for patients with severe attacks who underwent ERCP +/- ES than for those who received conservative treatment (median 9.5 versus 17.0 days).

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Ampulla of Vater / surgery*
  • Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde* / adverse effects
  • Cholecystectomy
  • Cholelithiasis / complications*
  • Cholelithiasis / diagnosis
  • Cholelithiasis / surgery
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Common Bile Duct Diseases / complications
  • Common Bile Duct Diseases / diagnosis
  • Common Bile Duct Diseases / surgery
  • Emergencies
  • Endoscopy
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pancreatitis / etiology
  • Pancreatitis / mortality
  • Pancreatitis / therapy*
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation
  • Severity of Illness Index