Nephrotoxicity of intravenous contrast media is more frequent and striking in patients with risk factors, the major one being preexisting chronic renal insufficiency. New nonionic low-osmolal contrast media allegedly have less nephrotoxicity than the traditional ionic high-osmolal ones. This was tested for two contrast media in a group of 18 patients with stable chronic renal insufficiency. The urinary excretion of two brush-border enzymes (alanine aminopeptidase, AAP, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, gamma-GT) and of a lysosomal enzyme (N-acetyl-beta glucosaminidase, NAG), functional markers of tubular injury, were measured before and after intravenous urography with an ionic high-osmolal radiocontrast medium, meglumine sodium diatrizoate, or with a non ionic low-osmolal one, iopamidol. Urinary NAG excretion did not change significantly after administration of either contrast media. Urinary AAP and gamma-GT excretion increased significantly (p less than 0.01) after diatrizoate. After iopamidol, only gamma-GT excretion increased significantly (p less than 0.05). Our data suggest that the nonionic low-osmolal radiocontrast medium iopamidol is less toxic to tubules than the ionic high-osmolal medium diatrizoate and that the brush-border enzymes AAP and gamma-GT are sensitive markers for this toxicity.