Impact of moderate vs stringent TSH suppression on survival in advanced differentiated thyroid carcinoma

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012 Apr;76(4):586-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04272.x.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess (i) the influence of Thyrotropin (TSH) suppression at a level of <0·1 mU/l and (ii) whether FT3 and FT4 levels have a prognostic significance independently of TSH values with regard to survival in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and distant metastases.

Patients and methods: In a retrospective patient chart study, we reviewed survival in 157 DTC patients with distant metastases treated between September 1985 and 1 July 2010. Patients with at least three available FT3 and FT4 values during TSH suppression were eligible.

Results: Fifty-three of 157 patients died from DTC. DTC-specific survival was significantly better in patients with a median TSH level ≤0·1 mU/l (median survival 15·8 years) than those with a non-suppressed TSH level (median survival 7·1 years; P < 0·001). However, there was no further improvement in survival caused by TSH suppression to a level ≤ 0·03 mU/l (P = 0·24). FT3 and FT4 levels were also significantly associated with poorer survival; of these, only the prognostic value of FT3 was independent from that of TSH levels.

Conclusion: The care of patients with DTC and distant metastases is like walking an endocrinological tightrope: non-suppressed TSH levels, that is, >0·1 mU/l, are associated with an impaired prognosis. There is, however, no prognostic benefit from suppressing TSH to levels lower than 0·1 mU/l. On the contrary, an improvement in prognosis might be achieved by keeping FT3 levels as low as possible.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thyroid Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Thyrotropin / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Thyrotropin