The importance of relative standards in ADHD diagnoses: evidence based on exact birth dates

J Health Econ. 2010 Sep;29(5):641-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

Abstract

This paper presents evidence that diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are driven largely by subjective comparisons across children in the same grade in school. Roughly 8.4 percent of children born in the month prior to their state's cutoff date for kindergarten eligibility - who typically become the youngest and most developmentally immature children within a grade - are diagnosed with ADHD, compared to 5.1 percent of children born in the month immediately afterward. A child's birth date relative to the eligibility cutoff also strongly influences teachers' assessments of whether the child exhibits ADHD symptoms but is only weakly associated with similarly measured parental assessments, suggesting that many diagnoses may be driven by teachers' perceptions of poor behavior among the youngest children in a classroom. These perceptions have long-lasting consequences: the youngest children in fifth and eighth grades are nearly twice as likely as their older classmates to regularly use stimulants prescribed to treat ADHD.

Keywords: ADHD; diagnoses; regression discontinuity; symptoms.

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors*
  • Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity / diagnosis*
  • Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity / drug therapy
  • Central Nervous System Stimulants / therapeutic use
  • Child
  • Child Behavior*
  • Child Development
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Faculty*
  • Humans
  • Parents / psychology*
  • Perception
  • Reference Standards

Substances

  • Central Nervous System Stimulants