Primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: does the choice of fibrinolytic agent impact on the importance of time-to-treatment?

Am J Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;94(6):772-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.05.064.

Abstract

The mortality benefit associated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction may be lost if door-to-balloon time is delayed by >1 hour compared with tissue plasminogen activator therapy door-to-needle time. When a substantial delay in initiating primary PCI is likely, reperfusion therapy with second- or third-generation fibrinolytic agents should be strongly considered.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary*
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Infarction / therapy*
  • Thrombolytic Therapy*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome