Themes in the history of medical professionalism

Mt Sinai J Med. 2002 Nov;69(6):357-62.

Abstract

Professionalism in medicine is an ambiguous term. Discussions are hampered by understandings of the past that are counterproductive to today s debates. Three decades of criticism of physicians as self-interested and arrogant, and of professional organizations as unfairly monopolistic have shaken the confidence of professional leaders and their constituents in their ability to act as a positive social force, and left the concept of professional autonomy without a useful meaning. Inherited assumptions about conflict between the profession, government and the market have encouraged organizational policies to fight familiar enemies for short-term gains, rather than reinvent professionalism as a social force or seek new strategic alliances. This article stresses the importance of distancing the present from the past in re-inventing professionalism for the future, and lists eight fundamental goals.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Medicine* / organization & administration
  • Clinical Medicine* / standards
  • Delivery of Health Care / organization & administration*
  • Ethics, Clinical
  • Humans
  • Organizational Policy
  • Physicians* / ethics
  • Physicians* / organization & administration
  • Physicians* / standards
  • Professional Autonomy*
  • United States