Objective: There are few data concerning the ability of prehospital providers to triage patients in a mass casualty incident (MCI). The authors evaluated the effectiveness of a brief educational intervention on MCI triage with a written scenario and test. The START method (simple triage and rapid treatment) was used.
Methods: The authors enrolled and tested 109 prehospital providers consisting of 31 paramedics and prehospital registered nurses (PHRNs) and 78 emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and first responders. A written scenario of an MCI was used to test participants before, immediately after, and again at one month after a two-hour educational intervention consisting of a slide and video presentation utilizing START.
Results: The 109 participants completed the pre-intervention and post-intervention test; 72 (66%) completed the one-month post-intervention as well. Mean work experience was 9 years (ranging from 1 to 27 years). The mean immediate post-test score (75% correct) was significantly improved compared with the mean pretest score (55% correct) for the 109 providers completing both tests (p < 0.001). Among advanced life support providers (EMT-Ps and PHRNs) completing all three surveys, the mean immediate post-test score (76% correct) and mean one-month post-test score (75% correct) were not significantly different. Among the basic life support providers completing all three surveys, a modest but statistically significant decay in mean scores from immediate post-test (74% correct) to one-month post-test (68% correct) was observed (p < 0.01). Prior training in MCI had no statistically significant effect on changes in mean test scores.
Conclusion: The ability of prehospital providers of all levels of training and experience to triage patients in an MCI is less than optimal. However, this ability improved dramatically after a single didactic session, and improvement persisted one month later.