Skip to main content
Log in

The Developing Role of Pharmacists in Patient Access to Emergency Contraception

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Disease Management & Health Outcomes

Abstract

Unintended pregnancy and subsequent abortion remain major public health issues in many countries, despite evidence that post-coital emergency contraceptives have a good safety profile, are easy to use, and are effective in preventing unwanted pregnancies. Although emergency contraceptives have been prescribed in developed countries for more than 25 years, abortion rates have continued to rise steadily in many jurisdictions. Barriers to the use of emergency contraceptives reduce ready access of women to this birth control option. Because the effectiveness of emergency contraceptives is time dependent, establishing prescribing and dispensing mechanisms that are convenient to women is crucial to their ability to use the therapy in a timely manner.

Emergency contraceptives in developed countries are traditionally prescribed by physicians in organized healthcare settings. In these countries, pharmacists are ideally situated to improve patient access to emergency contraceptives, since community pharmacies are widely available in both urban and rural settings and are open extended hours. Innovative initiatives using a variety of regulatory mechanisms now allow pharmacists a greater role in prescribing and distributing emergency contraceptives. In Washington State, USA, pharmacists entering into a collaborative drug therapy agreement with a physician or nurse practitioner can initiate emergency contraceptives based on a prescribing protocol. Several local programs in the United Kingdom have utilized accredited community pharmacists to supply emergency contraceptives using a patient group directive. In British Columbia, Canada, specially-certified pharmacists with independent prescriptive authority utilize an informed consent during the interactive consultation with the potential emergency contraceptive user. In yet other jurisdictions, emergency contraceptives have been transferred to over-the-counter (OTC) status.

Relevant public health research questions can now be posed. Future studies will be able to compare the effectiveness of various regulatory mechanisms to expand access, to identify and address potential drawbacks of pharmacist-initiated1 emergency contraceptives, and to explore whether pharmacist-initiated prescriptions represent expanded access or simply a transfer of the prescribing of these agents from physicians to pharmacists. Countries with OTC emergency contraceptives will be able to explore the relationship between varying levels of pharmacist interaction with emergency contraceptive users and health outcomes, and to investigate whether the change in prescriptive status has resulted in unintentional barriers to access for populations such as teenagers and those with restricted discretionary income. These findings will provide valuable new information on the impact of initiatives designed to expand access to emergency contraceptives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Consensus statement on emergency contraception [online]. Available from URL: http://www.path.org/outlook/html/13_3.htm [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  2. Canadian Consensus Conference on Contraception. Emergency postcoital contraception. J SOGC 1998; 20(7): 35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Trussell J, Rodriguez G, Ellertson C. Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception 1999; 59(3): 147–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuzpe A, Thurlow H, Ramzy I, et al. Postcoital contraception: a pilot study. J Reprod Med 1974; 13(2): 53–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Statistics Canada. Therapeutic abortions by area of residence of patient [online]. Available from URL: http://www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/People/Health/health41a.htm [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  6. Centers for Disease Control. Abortion surveillance: preliminary analysis — United States, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000; 48(51): 1171–4, 1191.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Office for National Statistics. Abortion statistics: 2000 Series AB No. 27 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_health/AB27/AB_No27_V1.pdf [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  8. Van Look P, von Hertzen H. Induced abortion: a global perspective. In: Baird D, Grimes D, Van Look P, editors. Modern methods of inducing abortion. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1995: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Westley E. Emergency contraception: a global overview. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1998; 53(5 Suppl. 2): 215–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ratanajamit C, Chongsuvivatwong V. Survey of knowledge and practice on oral contraceptive and emergency contraceptive pills of drugstore personnel in Hat Yai, Thailand. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10: 149–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. British Columbia Vital Statistics Agency. Pregnancy counts and rates by age groups by health region: British Columbia 1991 to 1999. Victoria (BC): Ministry of Health Services, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Washington State Department of Health Centre for Health Statistics. Pregnancy statistics, Washington State residents, 1975–1999 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.doh.wa.gov/ehsphl/chs/chs-data/abortion/download/ATAB2_1999.xls [Accessed 2002 May 2].

  13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. pregnancy rate lowest in two decades [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/releases/00facts/trends.htm [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  14. Office for National Statistics. Birth statistics: 1998 Series FM1 no.28 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/FM1_28v4.pdf [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  15. Statistics Canada. Counts and rates of pregnancies by outcome of pregnancy and age group: Canada 1974–1998. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Washington State Department of Health Centre for Health Statistics. Induced abortion rates of county of residence, Washington State, 1993–1999 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.doh.wa.gov/ehsphl/chs/chs-data/abortion/download/ATAB4_1999.xls [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  17. Glasier A. Emergency postcoital contraception. N Engl J Med 1997; 337(15): 1058–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Swahn M, Westlund P, Johannisson E, et al. Effect of postcoital contraceptive methods on the endometrium and the menstrual cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 738–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodrigues I, Grou F, Joly J. Effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184(4): 531–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation: World Health Organization. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet 1998; 352: 428–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ho P, Kwan M. A prospective randomized comparison of levonorgestrel with the Yuzpe regimen in postcoital contraception. Hum Reprod 1993; 8(3): 389–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Piaggio G, von Hertzen H, Grimes D, et al. Timing of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel or the Yuzpe regimen [research letter]. Lancet 1999; 353: 721.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Webb A. How safe is the Yuzpe method of emergency contraception? Fertility Control Reviews 1995; 4(2): 16–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Glasier A. Safety of emergency contraception. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1998; 53(5 Suppl. 2): 219–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vasilakis C, Jick S, Jick H. The risk of venous thromboembolism in users of postcoital contraceptive pills: certain combined oral contraceptives for use as emergency postcoital contraception. Contraception 1999; 59(2): 79–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wellbery C. Emergency contraception. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9: 642–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Blanchard K. Improving women’s access to emergency contraception: Innovative information and service delivery strategies. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1998; 53(5 Suppl. 2): 238–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Delbanco S, Stewart F, Koenig J, et al. Are we making progress with emergency contraception? Recent findings on American adults and health professionals. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1998; 53(5 Suppl. 2): 242–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Webb A. Emergency contraception: is it time to change method? BMJ 1999; 318: 342–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Glasier A, Baird D. The effects of self-administering emergency contraception. N Engl J Med 1998; 339(1): 1–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Weisberg E, Fraser IS. Knowledge and use of emergency contraception among women seeking termination of pregnancy in New South Wales [letter]. Med J Aust 1997; 166(6): 336.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Graham A, Green L, Glasier AF. Teenagers’ knowledge of emergency contraception: questionnaire survey in south east Scotland. BMJ 1996; 312(7046): 1567–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith BH, Gurney EM, Aboulela L, et al. Emergency contraception: a survey of women’s knowledge and attitudes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103(11): 1109–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Young L, McCowan L, Roberts H, et al. Emergency contraception — why women don’t use it. N Z Med J 1995; 108: 145–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Paintin D, editor. The provision of emergency hormonal contraception. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  36. US Food and Drug Administration. Certain combined oral contraceptives for use as postcoital emergency contraception. Fed Regist 1997; 62(37): 8609–12.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Davis V, Dunn S. Emergency postcoital contraception. J SOGC 2000; 92: 544–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kishen M, Presho M. Emergency contraception — a prescription for change. Br J Farn Plann 1996; 22: 25–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Brittain D. Establishing an educational programme for nurses to supply emergency hormonal contraception (combined method) to protocol. Br J Fam Plann 1999; 25(3): 118–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wearn A, Gill P. Hormonal emergency contraception: moving over the counter? J Clin Pharm Ther 1999; 24: 313–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Grimes D, Raymond E, Scott Jones B. Emergency contraception over-the-counter: the medical and legal imperatives. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 151–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Harrison-Woolrych M, Duncan A, Howe J, et al. Improving access to emergency contraception. BMJ 2001; 322(7280): 186–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Off ice of Population Research. NOT-2-LATE.com: The emergency contraception website [online]. Available from URL: http://ec.princeton.edu/worldwide/defaultasp [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  44. Wells E, Hutchings J, Gardner J, et al. Using pharmacies in Washington state to expand access to emergency contraception. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30(6): 287–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Washington State Board of Pharmacy. Pharmacy law book: revised code of Washington. Olympia (WA): Washington State Board of Pharmacy, 1996.

  46. Hutchings J, Winkler J, Fuller T, et al. When the morning after is Sunday: pharmacist prescribing of emergency contraceptive. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1998; 53(5 Suppl. 2): 230–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gardner JS, Hutchings J, Fuller TS, et al. Increasing access to emergency contraception through community pharmacies: lessons from Washington State. Fam Plann Perspect 2001; 33(4): 172–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Program for Appropriate Technology and Health (PATH). Final report to the David and Lucile Packard Foundation: Emergency Contraceptive Pills Collaborative Agreement Pilot Project in Washington State. Seattle (WA): 1999.

  49. Marciante K, Gardner J, Veenstra D, et al. Modeling the cost and outcomes of pharmacist-prescribed emergency contraception. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 1443–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bissell P, Anderson C, Savage I, et al. Supplying emergency hormonal contraception through patient group direction: a qualitative study of the views of pharmacists [abstract]. IIJPP [online journal] 2001; 9 Suppl.: R57 Available from URL: http://www.pharmj.com/IJPP/bpc2001/ijpp_bpc2001_r57.pdf [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  51. Anderson C, Bissell P, Sharma S, et al. Supplying emergency hormonal contraception in the pharmacy: the perspectives of service users [abstract]. IJPP 2001; 9: R56 Available from URL: http://www.pharmj.com/IJPP/bpc2001/ijpp_bpc2001_r57.pdf [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  52. National Pharmaceutical Association. First wave emergency hormonal contraception schemes: lessons learnt to date. St. Albans: National Pharmaceutical Association, 2000.

  53. Royal Pharmaceutical Society UK. Guidance on pharmacy supply of EHC. Pharmaceut J 2000; 265(7127 Dec 16: 890–2.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Spencer H. Expanding access to emergency contraceptive pills. Can Fam Physician 2001; 47: 2168.

    Google Scholar 

  55. National Advisory Committee on Emergency Contraception. Decreasing unintended pregnancy by increasing awareness of and access to emergency contraceptive pills. Ottawa (ON): National Advisory Committee on Emergency Contraception, 2001.

  56. Henshaw S. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30(1): 24–29, 46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Panchaud C, Singh S, Feivelson D, et al. Sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents in developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect 2000; 32(1): 24–32, 45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Johnson RA. Diagnosis and treatment of common sexually transmitted diseases in women. Clin Cornerstone 2000; 3(1): 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Canadian Paediatric Society Adolescent Medicine Committee. Emergency contraception. Paediatrics Child Health 1998; 3(5): 359–61.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Program for Appropriate Technology and Health (PATH). Washington State Training manual: expanding access to emergency contraceptive pills. Promoting pharmacist/prescriber collaborative agreements [online]. Available from URL: http://www.path.org/resources/ec_tools.htm [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  61. British Columbia Pharmacy Association. Expanding access to emergency contraceptive pills: training manual. Richmond (BC): British Columbia Pharmacy Association, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bissell P, Anderson C, Bacon L, et al. Community pharmacy supply of emergency contraception [letter]. BMJ 2001; 323: 751.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Thomas P. Why hormonal contraception should be prescription-only [letter] [online]. Available from URL: http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/322/7280/186/a#12350 [Accessed 2002 Sep 3]. BMJ. com [online journal] 2001 Jan 31; 322:.

  64. Stammers T. EHC from pharmacists; missed opportunity for STI reduction [letter] [online]. Available from URL: http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/322/7280/186/a#12350 [Accessed 2002 Sep 3]. BMJ.com [online journal] 2001; 322(1280): 186.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Clarke J. What do pharmacists know about sexual health services? BMJ.com 2001 Sep 29 [online]. Available from http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/323/7315/751#16780 [Accessed 2002 Jan 30].

  66. Patel M, Minshall L. Management of sexual assault. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2001; 19(3): 817–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Reynolds MW, Peipert JF, Collins B. Epidemiologic issues of sexually transmitted diseases in sexual assault victims. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55(1): 51–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Rowlands S, Devalia H, Lawrenson R, et al. Repeated use of hormonal emergency contraception by younger women in the UK. Br J Farn Plann 2000; 26(3): 138–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. LeBel M, Masson E, Guilbert E, et al. Effects of rifabutin and rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38(11): 1042–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Barditch-Crovo P, Trapnell CB, Ette E, et al. The effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination oral contraceptive. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 65(4): 428–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Weisberg E. Interactions between oral contraceptives and antifungals/antibacterials: is contraceptive failure the result? Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 36(5): 309–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Centre for Pharmacy Postgraduate Education. Clinical aspects of emergency contraception [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cppe.man.ac.uk/ehc/index.htm [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  73. Office of Population Research. NOT-2-LATE.com: Are there different recommendations for taking emergency contraceptive pills for women receiving enzyme inducers such as Dilantin? [online]. Available from URL: http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ecdilantin.html [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  74. BBC News Online. Teenager contraceptive fears ‘unfounded’. 2001 Aug 17 [online]. Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1494000/1494989.stm [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  75. Avon Health Authority. Emergency contraception after hours [news release] 2001 Dec 19 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.avonhealth.org.uk/pdf_docs/pressreleases/2001/december/emergency_contraception.pdf [Accessed 2002 Sep 3].

  76. Trussell J, Koenig J, Ellertson C, et al. Preventing unintended pregnancy: the costeffectiveness of three methods of emergency contraception. Am J Public Health 1997; 87(6): 932–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Trussell J, Wiebe E, Shochet T, et al. Cost savings from emergency contraceptive pills in Canada. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97(5 Pt 1): 789–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Ellertson C, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al. Should emergency contraceptive pills be available without prescription? J Am Med Womens Assoc 1998; 53(5 S2): 226–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

The research reported in this paper was supported in part by grants from the British Columbia Ministry of Health and the Vancouver Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Fielding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soon, J.A., Levine, M., Ensom, M.H.H. et al. The Developing Role of Pharmacists in Patient Access to Emergency Contraception. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 10, 601–611 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210100-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210100-00001

Keywords

Navigation