Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What effect does inpatient physician specialty and experience have on clinical outcomes and resource utilization on a general medical service?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of internal medicine specialty and physician experience on inpatient resource use and clinical outcomes on an academic general medicine service.

DESIGN: A 1-year retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: The University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

PATIENTS: Two thousand six hundred seventeen admissions to the general medicine service from July 2001 to June 2002, excluding those for whom data were incomplete (n=18).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Length of stay (LOS) and total hospital costs were used to measure resource utilization. Hospital mortality and 14-day and 30-day readmission rates were used to measure clinical outcomes. Adjusted mean LOS was significantly greater for rheumatologists (0.56 days greater; P=.002) and endocrinologists (0.38 days greater; P=.03) compared to general internists. Total costs were lower for general internists compared to endocrinologists ($1100 lower; P=.01) and rheumatologists ($431 lower; P=.07). Hospitalists showed a trend toward reduced LOS compared to all other physicians (0.31 days lower; P=.06). The top two deciles of physicians stratified by recent inpatient general medical experience showed significantly reduced LOS compared to all other physicians (0.35 days lower; P=.04). No significant differences were seen in readmission rates or in-hospital mortality among the various physician groups.

CONCLUSIONS: General internists had lower lengths of stay and costs compared to endocrinologists and rheumatologists. Hospitalists showed a trend toward reduced LOS compared to all other physicians. Recent inpatient general medicine experience appears to be a determinant of reduced inpatient resource use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lurie J, Miller D, Lucknaw P, Wachter R, Sox H. The potential size of the hospitalist workforce in the United States. Am J Med. 1999;106:441–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wachter R. An introduction to the hospitalist model. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:338–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wachter R, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA. 2002;287:487–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wachter R, Katz P, Showstack J, Bindman A, Goldman L. Reorganizing an academic medical service: impact on cost, quality, patient satisfaction and education. JAMA. 1998;279:1560–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Diamond HS, Goldberg E, Janoskly JE. The effect of full time faculty hospitalists on efficiency of care at a community teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:197–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kearns P, Way C, Morris W, et al. Hospital care by hospital-based and clinic-based faculty: a prospective controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:235–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Auerbach A, Wachter R, Katz P, Showstack J, Baron R, Goldman L. Implementation of a voluntary hospitalists service at a community teaching hospital: improved clinical efficiency and patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:859–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meltzer D, Manny W, Morrison J, et al. Effects of physician experience on costs and outcomes on an academic general medicine service: results of a trial of hospitalists. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:866–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer H, Armistead N, Marivannan S, et al. The effect of a hospitalist service on patient care in an academic teaching hospital. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(suppl):S116.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer H, Delamatta M, Mebride C, et al. After discharge effects of a hospitalist service. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(suppl):S211.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer H, Armistead N, Elnicki M, et al. The effect of a hospitalist service with nurse discharge planner on patient care in an academic teaching hospital. Am J Med. 2001;111:627–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernard A, Shapiro L, McMahon L. The influence of attending physician subspecialization on hospital length of stay. Med Care. 1990;28:170–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayward R, Manning G, McMahon L, Bernard A. Do attending or resident physician practice styles account for variations in hospital resource use? Med Care. 1994;32:788–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. The Editors of the Annals of Internal Medicine. The who, what, where, whom, and how of hospitalist care. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:930–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikas Parekh MD.

Additional information

Dr. Saint is supported by a Career Development Award from the Health Services Research and Development Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs and a Patient Safety Developmental Center Grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (P20-HS11540).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parekh, V., Saint, S., Furney, S. et al. What effect does inpatient physician specialty and experience have on clinical outcomes and resource utilization on a general medical service?. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 395–401 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30298.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30298.x

Key words

Navigation