Original Contributions
Serum progesterone testing to predict ectopic pregnancy in symptomatic first-trimester patients*,**,*

https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2000.108653Get rights and content

Abstract

Study Objective: This study was conducted to prospectively measure the accuracy of serum progesterone levels to detect ectopic pregnancy. Methods: Seven hundred sixteen symptomatic first-trimester emergency department patients with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding at a tertiary care military teaching hospital had progesterone levels measured by radioimmunoassay with results unavailable to the treating physician. All patients were monitored until a criterion standard diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy or ectopic pregnancy was confirmed. Results: A 14-month derivation phase (n=399) used receiver operating characteristic curve testing to select a cutoff value of progesterone less than 22 ng/mL. A 12-month validation phase (n=317) then retested this cutoff value. Combining both phases, there were 434 (61%) viable intrauterine pregnancies, 229 (32%) nonviable intrauterine pregnancies, and 52 (7.3%) ectopic pregnancies, of which 17 were ruptured. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values (95% confidence intervals) for progesterone levels less than 22 ng/mL to detect ectopic pregnancy were 100% (94% to 100%), 27% (23% to 30%), 10% (7% to 12%), and 100% (98% to 100%), respectively. Conclusion: Given similar disease prevalence, roughly one fourth (178/716) of symptomatic patients can be classified as low risk (0%, 95% confidence interval 0 to 2%) for having an ectopic pregnancy using a progesterone cutoff of 22 ng/mL. Whether implementation of rapid progesterone testing can safely expedite care and reduce the need for urgent diagnostic evaluation or admission remains to be determined. [Buckley RG, King KJ, Disney JD, Riffenburgh RH, Gorman JD, Klausen JH. Serum progesterone testing to predict ectopic pregnancy in symptomatic first-trimester patients. Ann Emerg Med. August 2000;36:95-100.]

Introduction

Ectopic pregnancy is the leading cause of pregnancy-related death in the first trimester1 and a common primary care and emergency department diagnostic and management dilemma. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy increased more than fourfold from 1970 to 1992, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimating that almost 2% of all pregnancies are ectopic.2, 3 The yearly economic cost of ectopic pregnancy was estimated in 1990 to exceed $1.1 billion.4 Early diagnosis, therefore, is crucial, both to reduce morbidity and mortality and to reduce the risk of future infertility.

Previous studies have shown that the serum progesterone level is a potentially useful laboratory marker for ectopic pregnancy. Many of these studies were either selected case series,5, 6, 7 retrospective in design,8, 9 or used progesterone cutoff levels less that 20 ng/mL.10, 11, 12 In the largest prospective study to date, with more than 1,900 patients enrolled, Stovall et al13 found that a progesterone level less than 25 ng/mL had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 62%. This study, despite limitations and a relatively high rate of patients lost to follow-up, demonstrated the potential role of progesterone level as a screening test. Similar conclusions were reached in a recent meta-analysis, which found that, although lacking adequate specificity to predict the presence of ectopic pregnancy, the progesterone level was sensitive enough at higher cutoff values to virtually exclude the diagnosis.14

To further characterize the ability of the serum progesterone level to predict the presence or absence of ectopic pregnancy in symptomatic ED patients, we assembled a prospective clinical data registry with follow-up of all patients until a criterion standard pregnancy diagnosis was established. In the first phase of our study, we derived a maximally sensitive cutoff value.15 We then independently validated our findings in a second group of patients. By measuring the accuracy of serum progesterone testing, we hope to better define the role that such testing may play in the ED management of first-trimester patients at risk of ectopic gestation.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

All patients presenting to the ED at Naval Medical Center San Diego between August 1, 1994, and September 30, 1996, with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy, were prospectively entered into a clinical data registry. Naval Medical Center San Diego is a tertiary care teaching hospital with an annual ED census of approximately 60,000 patients. We excluded all patients with prior documentation of an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) on pelvic ultrasonography and those

Results

Between August 1994 and October 1996, 1,047 patients presenting to the ED with the chief complaint of abdominal pain with or without vaginal bleeding were prospectively enrolled in a clinical data registry. One hundred fourteen patients were excluded: 2 because of hemodynamic instability, 74 because of previously documented IUP, and 38 because of incomplete coding of key clinical data elements (such as pain history or abdominal or pelvic findings). Of the remaining 933, 18 (1.9%) were lost to

Discussion

From a prospective cohort of 718 symptomatic first-trimester patients, we found that no patient with an ectopic pregnancy had a progesterone level greater than 22 ng/mL. The resulting sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 26.8%, therefore, allow for roughly one fourth of all symptomatic first-trimester patients to be classified as being at low risk (95% CI 0 to 2%) of having an ectopic pregnancy.

Our findings are similar to those of earlier investigators. Three previous prospective studies

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Biomarkers for ectopic pregnancy and pregnancy of unknown location

    2013, Fertility and Sterility
    Citation Excerpt :

    Further studies are needed to replicate these findings and move this promising marker from phase III to phase IV of development. As a readily available clinical assay, P has been extensively studied as a potential marker of early pregnancy failure and EP, both as a single marker and in combination (29, 30, 34, 37, 42, 52–77). A meta-analysis of 26 studies suggested that serum P <5 ng/mL had good prediction for non-viable pregnancies, but was unable to differentiate EPs from aIUPs (75).

  • Single point biochemical measurement algorithm for early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

    2013, Clinical Biochemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Our findings were consistent with some other studies [27,46,47] including a meta-analysis of 26 studies [30], in which progesterone failed to discriminate between ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous miscarriage. Buckley et al. [48] found a sensitivity of 100% for ectopic pregnancy at a cutoff of 22 ng/mL but, at our similar cutoff of 20.4 ng/mL (Table 3), we found a sensitivity of only 65% for ectopic pregnancy. Overall, despite the significant all-pairwise Kruskal–Wallis results (Table 2), ROC analyses revealed that the performance of progesterone was poor, compared to the other markers (Fig. 2 and Table 3).

  • Predictive value of serum human chorionic gonadotropin ratio, progesterone and inhibin A for expectant management of early pregnancies of unknown location

    2012, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recent data indicate that low serum progesterone (s-progesterone) levels correlate with spontaneously resolving pregnancy [6–9] and very low values (<10 nmol/l) at presentation may safely predict spontaneous resolution of PUL [9]. This parameter has been suggested for use in conjunction with s-hCG in order to improve diagnostic efficacy [5,7,8,10–16]. Low s-inhibin A is another potential predictor of spontaneously resolving PUL [2,12].

  • Ectopic Pregnancy

    2008, Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Ectopic Pregnancy

    2007, Pediatric Emergency Medicine
View all citing articles on Scopus
*

The Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, Navy Department, Washington, DC, Clinical Investigation Program, sponsored this report No. 84-16-1968-897 as required by NSHSBETHINST 6000.41A.

**

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States government.

*

Address for reprints: CDR Robert G. Buckley, MC, USN, Naval Hospital Rota Spain, PSC 819, Box 18, NH #104, FPO, AE 09645-5018; 011-34-956-82-3308, fax,011-34-956-82-3306; E-mail,[email protected].

View full text