Weight at birth and subsequent risk of preeclampsia as an adult☆
Section snippets
Study design and population
This case-control study was conducted at Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, Wash, and Tacoma General Hospital in Tacoma, Wash, from April 1998 through February 2001. During this study period, we identified 233 women with preeclampsia. We used the then-current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines to create an operational clinical research definition for preeclampsia.16 These guidelines defined preeclampsia as sustained pregnancy-induced hypertension with proteinuria.
Results
The sociodemographic, medical, and reproductive characteristics of cases and control subjects are presented in Table I. Cases tended to be younger, nulliparous, heavier, and more likely to have a family history of hypertension.
Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of preeclampsia risk according to maternal birth weight category are shown in Table II. Those women who were in the lowest birth weight category had the greatest risk of preeclampsia; those women who had weighed the most at birth had
Comment
Women who reported a birth weight of <2500 g were found to be at an increased risk of the development of preeclampsia in this case-control study. After an adjustment for confounders was made, women who were in this lowest birth weight group had a 2.3-fold increased risk compared with women who weighed between 2500 and 2999 g at birth. Women who weighed 3000 to 3999 g or ≥4000 g at birth had a 44% and 54% reduced risk of preeclampsia, respectively, although these associations were not
Acknowledgements
We thank the participants of the Alpha Study for their cooperation and Malou Andresen, Penny Anders-Bartolo, Ihunnaya Frederick, Raymond Miller, Trudi Witt, and Kathy Ramsey for their technical expertise.
References (26)
- et al.
Fetal nutrition and adult disease
Am J Clin Nutr
(2000) - et al.
Serum lipoproteins, insulin, and urinary prostanoid metabolites in normal and hypertensive pregnant women
Obstet Gynecol
(1995) - et al.
Fewer nephrons at birth: a missing link in the etiology of essential hypertension?
Am J Kidney Dis
(1995) - et al.
Fetal origins of adult disease: epidemiology and mechanisms
J Clin Pathol
(2000) - et al.
Rate of intra-uterine growth
Nature
(1968) - et al.
Maternal birth weight and subsequent pregnancy outcome
JAMA
(1983) - et al.
Low birth weight across generations
JAMA
(1984) - et al.
The Washington State Intergenerational Study of Birth Outcomes: methodology and some comparisons of maternal birthweight and infant birth weight and gestation in four ethnic groups
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol
(1999) - et al.
Fetal programming of human disease
- et al.
Birth weight and adult hypertension and obesity in women
Circulation
(1996)
Fetal and infant growth and cardiovascular risk factors in women
BMJ
A population-based cohort study of the relation between maternal birth weight and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in four race/ethnic groups
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol
Association of a woman's own birth weight with subsequent risk for gestational diabetes
JAMA
Cited by (49)
Maternal low birth weight and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
2021, Pregnancy HypertensionCitation Excerpt :Compared with previous reports, the odds ratio for HDP among women born with low birth weight in this study was lower, and there was no statistically significant association between maternal low birth weight and preeclampsia (p = 0.09). Although this is also in line with a previous study [12], possible explanations for the lack of association between maternal low birth weight and preeclampsia were: (1) the pathophysiological difference between HDP and preeclampsia; (2) differences in race and country, and (3) the potential risk for developing preeclampsia may be different between women born at preterm without growth restrictions and women born at term with growth restrictions, despite comparable birth weights. Firstly, HDP not only refers to preeclampsia, but also to gestational hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, and chronic hypertension, indicating a heterogeneous pathophysiology [24].
Low birth weight and abnormal pre-pregnancy body mass index were at higher risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
2020, Pregnancy HypertensionCitation Excerpt :The association between low birth weight and HDP in Asian people has not been well explored, and there has been no study of Japanese women. It was reported that women who were born small and became overweight in later life had a particularly high risk for subsequent HDP [14]. On the other hand, there was no study that statistically assessed the risk for HDP in women who were born small and were underweight in later life.
Prematurity, smallness-for-gestational age and later hospital admissions: A nation-wide registry study
2015, Early Human DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :The hypothesis of the developmental origins of adult disease, also known as the Barker hypothesis, states that intrauterine conditions affect the risk of disease later in life, especially cardiovascular disease [2,3]. Many studies have confirmed this hypothesis, and SGA has been shown to be associated with development of gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia as well as type 2 diabetes later in life [4–7]. Preterm birth is also a risk factor for the same diseases, partly due to the high incidence of SGA in the preterm population, and possibly due to postnatal growth restriction [7].
Effect of low birth weight on women's health
2014, Clinical TherapeuticsPre-eclampsia: Risk factors and causal models
2011, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and GynaecologyCitation Excerpt :They are also more likely to have hypertension that is independent of pregnancy.58 Similar results were reported by Dempsey et al.,59 who also found the risk in African–American women to be higher than the risk in white or Hispanic women, and by Knuist et al., who found black women to have a doubled risk compared with white women.60 Women of other ethnic origins (Mediterranean, Asian or other) also had higher risks, but the numbers were small, and the estimates did not reach significance.
- ☆
Supported in part by awards from the National Institutes of Health (HD/HL R01-34888) and from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services (MCJ-530837).