Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

Systematic meta-analyses and field synopsis of genetic association studies in schizophrenia: the SzGene database

Abstract

In an effort to pinpoint potential genetic risk factors for schizophrenia, research groups worldwide have published over 1,000 genetic association studies with largely inconsistent results. To facilitate the interpretation of these findings, we have created a regularly updated online database of all published genetic association studies for schizophrenia ('SzGene'). For all polymorphisms having genotype data available in at least four independent case-control samples, we systematically carried out random-effects meta-analyses using allelic contrasts. Across 118 meta-analyses, a total of 24 genetic variants in 16 different genes (APOE, COMT, DAO, DRD1, DRD2, DRD4, DTNBP1, GABRB2, GRIN2B, HP, IL1B, MTHFR, PLXNA2, SLC6A4, TP53 and TPH1) showed nominally significant effects with average summary odds ratios of 1.23. Seven of these variants had not been previously meta-analyzed. According to recently proposed criteria for the assessment of cumulative evidence in genetic association studies, four of the significant results can be characterized as showing 'strong' epidemiological credibility. Our project represents the first comprehensive online resource for systematically synthesized and graded evidence of genetic association studies in schizophrenia. As such, it could serve as a model for field synopses of genetic associations in other common and genetically complex disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mueser, K.T. & McGurk, S.R. Schizophrenia. Lancet 363, 2063–2072 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Owen, M.J., Craddock, N. & O'Donovan, M.C. Schizophrenia: genes at last? Trends Genet. 21, 518–525 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sullivan, P.F., Kendler, K.S. & Neale, M.C. Schizophrenia as a complex trait: evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 60, 1187–1192 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Badner, J.A. & Gershon, E.S. Meta-analysis of whole-genome linkage scans of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 7, 405–411 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis, C.M. et al. Genome scan meta-analysis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, part II: schizophrenia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 34–48 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertram, L., McQueen, M.B., Mullin, K., Blacker, D. & Tanzi, R.E. Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nat. Genet. 39, 17–23 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thakkinstian, A. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between complement factor H Y402H polymorphisms and age-related macular degeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15, 2784–2790 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ioannidis, J.P., Ntzani, E.E. & Trikalinos, T.A. 'Racial' differences in genetic effects for complex diseases. Nat. Genet. 36, 1312–1318 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lange, C., DeMeo, D., Silverman, E.K., Weiss, S.T. & Laird, N.M. PBAT: tools for family-based association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 367–369 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ioannidis, J.P. & Trikalinos, T.A. Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 58, 543–549 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, D. & He, L. Association study between the NMDA receptor 2B subunit gene (GRIN2B) and schizophrenia: a HuGE review and meta-analysis. Genet. Med. 9, 4–8 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mah, S. et al. Identification of the semaphorin receptor PLXNA2 as a candidate for susceptibility to schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 11, 471–478 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lencz, T. et al. Converging evidence for a pseudoautosomal cytokine receptor gene locus in schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 12, 572–580 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujii, T. et al. Failure to confirm an association between the PLXNA2 gene and schizophrenia in a Japanese population. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 31, 873–877 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ioannidis, J.P. et al. Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. Int. J. Epidemiol. 37, 120–132 (2008); published online 26 September 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ioannidis, J.P. et al. A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology. Nat. Genet. 38, 3–5 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ioannidis, J.P., Ntzani, E.E., Trikalinos, T.A. & Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D.G. Replication validity of genetic association studies. Nat. Genet. 29, 306–309 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lohmueller, K.E., Pearce, C.L., Pike, M., Lander, E.S. & Hirschhorn, J.N. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat. Genet. 33, 177–182 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447, 661–678 (2007).

  20. Missale, C., Fiorentini, C., Busi, C., Collo, G. & Spano, P.F. The NMDA/D1 receptor complex as a new target in drug development. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 6, 801–808 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tauscher, J. et al. Equivalent occupancy of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors with clozapine: differentiation from other atypical antipsychotics. Am. J. Psychiatry 161, 1620–1625 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams, N.M., O'Donovan, M.C. & Owen, M.J. Is the dysbindin gene (DTNBP1) a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia? Schizophr. Bull. 31, 800–805 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weickert, C.S. et al. Human dysbindin (DTNBP1) gene expression in normal brain and in schizophrenic prefrontal cortex and midbrain. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 61, 544–555 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roffman, J.L. et al. Contribution of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms to negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 63, 42–48 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Frosst, P. et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat. Genet. 10, 111–113 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Put, N.M. et al. A second common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: an additional risk factor for neural-tube defects? Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 1044–1051 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Munafo, M.R., Thiselton, D.L., Clark, T.G. & Flint, J. Association of the NRG1 gene and schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 11, 539–546 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGorry, P.D. et al. Spurious precision: procedural validity of diagnostic assessment in psychotic disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 152, 220–223 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wacholder, S., Chanock, S., Garcia-Closas, M., El Ghormli, L. & Rothman, N. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96, 434–442 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ioannidis, J.P. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2, e124 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Evangelou, E., Maraganore, D.M. & Ioannidis, J.P. Meta-analysis in genome-wide association datasets: strategies and application in Parkinson disease. PLoS ONE 2, e196 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. DerSimonian, R. & Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials 7, 177–188 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Higgins, J.P. & Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 21, 1539–1558 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J. & Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. 327, 557–560 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ioannidis, J.P., Patsopoulos, N. & Evangelou, E. Uncertainty in estimates of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Br. Med. J. 335, 914–916 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M. & Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br. Med. J. 315, 629–634 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Harbord, R.M., Egger, M. & Sterne, J.A. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat. Med. 25, 3443–3457 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lau, J., Ioannidis, J.P., Terrin, N., Schmid, C.H. & Olkin, I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. Br. Med. J. 333, 597–600 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ioannidis, J.P. & Trikalinos, T.A. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clin. Trials 4, 245–253 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study was provided by the National Alliance on Research in Schizophrenia and Depression (to L.B.). F.K.K. was supported by a PENED training grant co-financed by E.U. European Social Fund and the Greek Ministry of Development, General Secretariat for Research and Technology. We are grateful to the Schizophrenia Research Forum for hosting SzGene on their website. In particular, we would like to thank A. Bumstead, H. Heimer, C. Knep and P. Noyes for the online adaptation of SzGene and many helpful discussions. We would further like to thank the members of the Scientific Advisory Board (currently including W. Byerly, G.D. Smith, J. Kennedy, D.F. Levinson and M. Owen) for their repeated review of the database and their helpful comments and suggestions during the development of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This study was designed by L.B. (principal investigator). Literature searches, data entry and online curation of data was done by N.C.A. and S.B., with help from L.B. Analysis scripts were developed and written by M.B.M. and F.K.K., and analyses were done by N.C.A., F.K.K., J.P.A.I. and L.B. The manuscript was written by N.C.A. and L.B., with contributions from J.P.A.I, F.K.K., M.J.K. and R.E.T.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Bertram.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, N., Bagade, S., McQueen, M. et al. Systematic meta-analyses and field synopsis of genetic association studies in schizophrenia: the SzGene database. Nat Genet 40, 827–834 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.171

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.171

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing