A case of admitted scientific fraud has shed new light on the system that ensures the integrity of the scientific literature. Certain lapses from generally accepted standards of research may be more frequent than is commonly believed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
Research Integrity and Peer Review Open Access 20 September 2018
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, W., Feder, N. The integrity of the scientific literature. Nature 325, 207–214 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/325207a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/325207a0
This article is cited by
-
Knowledge and Perceptions of Honorary Authorship among Health Care Researchers: Online Cross-sectional Survey Data from the Middle East
Science and Engineering Ethics (2021)
-
Retracted papers by Iranian authors: causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations
Scientometrics (2021)
-
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2018)
-
Integrity: juniors see leaders gain from calculated dishonesty
Nature (2008)
-
How many scientific papers should be retracted?
EMBO reports (2007)