Skip to main content
Log in

The Prevalence of Effective Substance Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite an abundance of evaluative evidence concerning the effectiveness of several school-based substance use prevention curricula, many of the nation's middle schools continue to implement curricula that are either untested or ineffective. This study reports the prevalence of substance use prevention curricula in the nation's public and private schools that contain middle school grades. We also report school- and respondent-related backgound characteristics differentiating schools using at least 1 effective curriculum from those using ineffective or untested curricula. Respondents comprised the lead staff who taught substance use prevention in a representative sample of 1,905 of the nation's public and private schools that include middle school grades. Data were collected in 1999 by means of a self-administered survey. Altogether, 26.8% of all schools, including 34.6% of public schools and 12.6% of private schools, used at least 1 of the 10 effective curricula specified. Few school or respondent characteristics were related to program implementation. Over two thirds of schools reported using more than 1 curriculum, and almost half reported using 3 or more. Results demonstrate the considerable gap between our understanding of effective curricula and current school practice. Prevention researchers and practitioners should work closely together to find ways to increase the proportion of schools implementing effective curricula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1988). The effects of school-based substance abuse education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 8, 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, K., & Cueto, S. (1994). Drug abuse prevention curricula in public and private schools in Indiana. Journal of Drug Education, 24, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruvold, W. H. (1993). Ameta-analysis of adolescent smoking prevention programs. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 872–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Substance Abuse and Prevention (2001). CSAP's prevention portal: Model programs. Available at http://www.samhsa.gov/centers/csap/modelprograms/programs.cfm. Last updated Dec. 12, 2001. Accessed on May 18, 2001.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1994). Guidelines for school health programs to prevent tobacco use and addiction, Feb. 25, 1994. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ nccdphp/ dash/ptuaaag.htm. Last updated May 4, 2000. Accessed on May 18, 2001.

  • Drug Strategies, Inc. (1999). Making the grade: A guide to school drug prevention programs. Washington, DC: Drug Strategies, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusenbury, L., & Falco, M. (1995). Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. Journal of School Health, 65, 420–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenman, R. (1993). Who receives drug education in our schools? A paradox. Journal of Drug Education, 23, 133–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994). How effective is Drug Abuse Resistance Education? Ameta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1394–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingiss, P. L., Gottlieb, N. H., & Brink, S. G. (1994). Measuring cognitive characteristics associated with adoption and implementation of health innovations in schools. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8, 294–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, T. J. (1989). Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs. Journal of School Health, 59, 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, R. S., Parcel, G. S., Wallberg, H. J., Luepker, R. V., Portnoy, B., & Stone, E. J. (1991). Summary and conclusions of the THTM evaluation: The expert work group perspective. Journal of School Health, 61, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. B. (1992). School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980-1990. Health Education Research, 7, 403–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2001). The monitoring the future national survey results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2000 (NIH Publication No. 01-4923) (56 pp.). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, G., & Maligalig, D. S. (1991). A comparison of methods of weighting adjustment for nonresponse. In 1991 Annual Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 409-428). U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census.

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (1997). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A research-based guide. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcel, G. S., O-Hara-Tompkins, N. M., Harrist, R. B., Basen-Engquist, K. M., McCormink, L. K, Gottlieb, N. H., et al. (1995). Diffusion of an effective tobacco prevention program. Part 2: Evaluation of the adoption phase. Health Education Research, 10, 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulussen, T., Kok, G., Schaalma, H., & Parcel G. S. (1995). Diffusion of AIDS curricula among Dutch secondary school teachers.Health Education Quarterly, 22, 227–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality Education Data, Inc. (1998). QED national education database: Data users guide, Version 4.6. Denver, CO: Quality Education Data, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbach, L. A, Graham, J. W, & Hansen, W. B. (1993). Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: Predicators of program implementation. Preventive Medicine, 22, 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safe and Drug Free Schools Program, U.S. Department of Education (2001). http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/SDFS/ programs.html. Page last modified on Jan. 18, 2001. Accessed on June 26, 2001.

  • Schaps, E., DiBartolo, R., Moskowitz, J., Palley, C. S., & Churgin, S. (1981). A review of 127 drug a buse prevention program evaluations. Journal of Drug Issues, 1, 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, B. V., Barnwell, B. G., & Bieler, G. S. (1996). SUDAAN user's manual. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W., McCormick, L. K., Steckler, A. B., & McLeroy, K. R. (1993). Teachers' use of health curricula: Implementation of Growing Healthy, Project SMART, and the Teenage Health Teaching Modules. Journal of School Health, 63, 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R, Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, 275–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program (1998). Notice of final principles of effectiveness. Federal Register, 63, 29901–29906.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ringwalt, C.L., Ennett, S., Vincus, A. et al. The Prevalence of Effective Substance Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools. Prev Sci 3, 257–265 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020872424136

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020872424136

Navigation