Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:23:14.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk of schizophrenia in second-generation immigrants: a Danish population-based cohort study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2007

ELIZABETH CANTOR-GRAAE
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
CARSTEN B. PEDERSEN
Affiliation:
National Centre for Register-based Research, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark

Abstract

Background. Urban birth, a risk factor for schizophrenia, is more frequent among second-generation immigrants. The aim of the current study was to determine whether the increased risk for schizophrenia found in second-generation immigrants is explained by the degree of urbanization of birthplace and/or factors related to parentage, such as geographic origin or history of residence abroad during upbringing.

Method. Using data from the Danish Civil Registration System (CRS), we established a population-based cohort of 2·0 million Danes (persons born in Denmark). Schizophrenia in cohort members was identified by cross-linkage with the Danish Psychiatric Central Register.

Results. The relative risk of developing schizophrenia was 1·93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·79–2·08] and 2·96 (95% CI 2·49–3·51) among persons with one or both parents foreign-born respectively compared to native Danes. Adjustment for urbanization of birthplace and parental characteristics reduced these risks slightly. However, urbanization had a lesser effect in second-generation immigrants than in Danes. History of residence abroad was a risk factor for schizophrenia, regardless of whether parents were foreign-born or native Danes.

Conclusion. The increased risk found in second-generation immigrants cannot be explained by urbanization or parental characteristics pertaining to age, mental illness, geographic origin or residence abroad during a child's upbringing.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)