Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 63, Issue 11, December 2006, Pages 2791-2800
Social Science & Medicine

Socioeconomic gradients in smoking among young women: A British survey

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Marked and increasing socioeconomic gradients in cigarette smoking are well established. Tracking these differentials among women requires appropriate measures of their socioeconomic position (SEP) which are equivalent across older and younger age groups.

This study examines socioeconomic gradients in cigarette smoking by age among women aged 20–34, using a standard indicator of SEP (age left full-time education) and alternative indicators which take account of changes in women's educational levels across age cohorts. The study is based on a large cross-sectional British data set (n=12 398), the Southampton Women's Survey, conducted 1998–2002. Poisson log-linear regression with adjusted variance was used to predict smoking status (ever smoked ⩾1 cigarette a day for 1 year, currently smoking ⩾1 cigarette a day, and ex-smoker – ever-smoker not currently smoking ⩾1 cigarette a day) in models which controlled for SEP, age and year of interview.

Socioeconomic gradients in ever-smoking were marked but stable across age groups. With quitting more prevalent in the higher than lower socioeconomic groups, gradients in current smoking steepened across age groups, with significant age/SEP interactions. The socioeconomic patterning of ever, ex and current smoking was similar using both the standard and alternative measures of education, but interactions were less pronounced with the alternative measures.

Socioeconomic indicators which take account of the recent and rapid increase in women's educational participation rates may provide a more reliable indication of age-related differentials in smoking status than standard measures. Nonetheless, both conventional and alternative measures point to stable socioeconomic differentials in rates of ever-smoking and widening differentials in current smoking across age groups. Our study confirms that addressing the link between socioeconomic disadvantage and tobacco use remains a major challenge for the tobacco control community.

Introduction

Cigarette smoking is the major behavioural determinant of the diseases driving life expectancy in high-income countries (Peto, Lopez, Boreham, Thun, & Heath, 1994). Smoking rates have declined in these societies, but with men and women at different stages of the cigarette epidemic (Lopez, Collishaw, & Piha, 1994), the prevalence of cigarette smoking has typically fallen faster among men than women. The differential rates of decline have narrowed and, in an increasing number of countries, have eliminated the gender gap in prevalence among adults (Shafey, Dolwick, & Guindon, 2003). In adolescence, higher rates of smoking (⩾1 cigarette a week) are reported among girls than boys in an increasing number of European countries as well as in Australia and New Zealand (Currie et al., 2004; Hill, White & Segan, 1995; Statistics New Zealand, 1996). With adolescent smoking status tracking across early adulthood and into middle-age (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2002; Jefferis, Power, Graham, & Manor, 2004; Office for National Statistics, ONS, 2004; Schooling & Kuh, 2002), the smoking population of high-income countries is set to become increasingly female.

In Europe, as in the US, Australia and New Zealand, women's smoking is increasingly characterised by the socioeconomic gradients first evident among men (Cavelaars et al., 2000; Fiore et al., 1989; Graham, 1996; Pierce, Fiore, Novotny, Hatziandreu, & Davis, 1989; Statistics New Zealand, 1996). Rates of regular smoking (⩾1 cigarette a day) have fallen more rapidly among women in higher than lower socioeconomic groups, widening differentials in smoking over time and across age cohorts (Evandrou & Falkingham, 2002; Fiore et al., 1989; Giskes et al., 2005; Pierce et al., 1989). In Britain where occupation provides the primary measure of socioeconomic position (SEP), the decline in smoking prevalence among women in the lowest socioeconomic group has stalled since the mid-1980s, with a prevalence of 33% in 1986 and 34% in 2000. Across the same period, smoking rates fell from 25% to 13% among women in the highest socioeconomic group (ONS, 2001).

The prevalence of current smoking is determined by rates of ever-smoking and quitting smoking. Quit rates are low in early adulthood and increase with age (ONS, 2004). In consequence in industrialised societies like the UK, smoking rates are at their highest in early adulthood, and decline with age and across age groups (Evandrou & Falkingham, 2002; Jefferis et al., 2004; Kemm, 2001). Linked prospective studies are the research design of choice for mapping changes in smoking status across age groups. However, the limited pool of prospective studies relate to older cohorts entering adulthood at a time when their smoking habits were less strongly related to social disadvantage (Pollitt, Rose, & Kaufman, 2005). Cross-sectional studies have therefore been employed (Evandrou & Falkingham, 2002; Kemm, 2001; Laaksonen et al., 1999), although the difficulties of separating out cohort, age and period influences are well-recognised (Evandrou & Falkingham, 2002; Hallqvist, Lynch, Bartley, Lang, & Blane, 2004; Laaksonen et al., 1999).

Whatever the research design, appropriate measures of SEP are required. For women, parental status mediates the relationship between educational level and occupational status, with mothers more likely than non-mothers with equivalent education to be economically inactive or in low-skilled and low-paid jobs (Joshi, 2002). As a result, occupation provides a non-equivalent measure for mothers and non-mothers (as well as for women and men). Asset-based measures like housing tenure have been used as an alternative but provide a less reliable guide to the SEP of younger women where transitional tenures (renting with friends, living with parents) are more common (Pugh, Power, Goldblatt, & Arber, 1991). Even education, the most widely used measure of SEP in high-income societies, does not avoid the problem of non-commensurability between different groups of women. In high-income societies, educational qualifications are increasing the gateway into employment, with the result that younger cohorts spend longer in full-time education and achieve higher levels of educational qualifications than older cohorts (Heinz, 1999). As a result, standard measures of educational level like years of full-time education and highest educational qualification are not equivalent across age groups. However, equivalent indicators are rarely employed in studies of changes in smoking status over time.

Developing and testing alternative measures of SEP is therefore an important methodological task. In a cohort analysis of smoking prevalence, Laaksonen et al. (1999) constructed a binary measure by dividing respondents on the basis of their position above or below the median length of education in their birth cohort. We extend their work by investigating socioeconomic gradients in smoking status among women in early adulthood using both conventional and alternative measures. Drawing on a contemporary British study, we aim to establish whether gradients in ever-smoking, ex-smoking and current smoking (i) are steeper in older than younger age groups, and (ii) are moderated when alternative measures are used.

Section snippets

Sample

The Southampton Women's Survey (SWS) is a cross-sectional survey of 12 484 women aged 20–34 years who were not currently pregnant, resident in the city of Southampton, southern England. It was approved by the Southampton and South West Hampshire Local Research Ethics Committee. Participants were recruited from 1998 to 2002 via patient lists of general practices (Inskip et al., 2006; Robinson et al., 2004). Of those contacted, 75% agreed to take part. The final sample is representative of the

Results

There were marked differences in educational levels across the age groups (Table 1). For example, the proportion leaving education ⩽age 16 decreased from 50% among those aged 30–34 to 29% among women aged 20–24, while the proportion who stayed in education beyond age 19 increased from 18% to 36%.

Rates of ever-smoking were similar across age groups (46%). Among the ever-smokers, cessation rates increased across age groups (from 26% to 38%). Across age groups, rates of current smoking fell (from

Discussion

The changing gender and socioeconomic profile of cigarette smoking in high-income societies is moving the link between social disadvantage and women's smoking up the research and policy agenda. In the absence of prospective studies of contemporary cohorts, cross-sectional surveys can shed light on the socioeconomic patterning of women's smoking across cohorts. A British study examined changing socioeconomic gradients in smoking across cohorts born before 1965 using a measure of women's SEP

Conclusion

Tackling the links between women's socioeconomic circumstances and their smoking status is a major challenge for the tobacco control community. It is a challenge that requires analyses of contemporary data using appropriate measures of SEP. Our study is a small contribution to this evidence base.

In this British analysis of women aged 20–34, we found no evidence of a reduction in either rates or socioeconomic differentials of smoking uptake among younger age groups. While the proportion of

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the women who took part in the Southampton Women's Survey (SWS) and the survey staff who recruited the women and collected and processed the data. The paper forms part of a project based on the SWS funded by Cancer Research UK (C5649/A4694). The SWS was funded by the Dunhill Medical Trust, the Medical Research Council and the University of Southampton.

References (38)

  • M. Evandrou et al.

    Smoking behaviour and socio-economic status: A cohort analysis, 1974–98

    Health Statistics Quarterly

    (2002)
  • M.C. Fiore et al.

    Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. The changing influence of gender and race

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1989)
  • K. Giskes et al.

    Trends in smoking behaviour between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (2005)
  • H. Graham

    Promoting health against inequality

    Health Education Journal

    (1998)
  • H. Graham et al.

    Are there socioeconomic differentials in under-reporting of smoking in pregnancy?

    Tobacco Control

    (2003)
  • H.M. Inskip et al.

    Cohort profile: The Southampton Women's Survey

    International Journal of Epidemiology

    (2006)
  • M.J. Jarvis

    Patterns and predictors of smoking cessation in the general population

  • Cited by (35)

    • Socio-economic inequalities in the incidence of four common cancers: a population-based registry study

      2018, Public Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      The socio-economic gradient in lung cancer incidence largely reflects a socio-economic gradient in smoking, responsible for an estimated 80–85% of lung cancers.21 Multiple studies have demonstrated widening socio-economic inequalities in smoking prevalence in the UK over recent decades, which could explain the trends described here.7,22–24 The finding of a positive association between socio-economic position and breast cancer incidence also coincides with previous studies and can largely be explained by socio-economic differences in reproductive history and screening uptake.13,14,25,26

    • Is there a cannabis epidemic model? Evidence from France, Germany and USA

      2014, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many European countries have reached the last stage of this epidemic and therefore display persistent or widening socioeconomic differences in relation to smoking at the same time declining prevalence of smoking occurs in the population as a whole (Huisman, Kunst, & Mackenbach, 2005). The literature shows a trend toward widening inequalities in cigarette smoking at this last stage of the epidemic in many developed countries (Federico, Costa, & Kunst, 2007; Harman, Graham, Francis, & Inskip, 2006; Legleye, Khlat, Beck, & Peretti-Watel, 2011; Smith, Frank, & Mustard, 2009) or at least a persistence of educational disparities (Pampel, 2009). The comparison of cannabis and tobacco may not seem straightforward, since tobacco is a legal product and cannabis is not.

    • Widening inequalities in smoking initiation and cessation patterns: A cohort and gender analysis in France

      2011, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Associations between educational level and tobacco outcomes were first computed using age-adjusted odds ratios in each age group and for each gender separately, using the highest educational level as the reference. Secondly, as tracking the trends in educational gradients requires equivalent measures across age groups (Harman et al., 2006), we also computed the relative index of inequality (RII) (Mackenbach and Kunst, 1997) in each cohort and for each gender separately, following Hayes and Berry (2002). Thirdly, gender ratios for each educational level were estimated by computing odds ratios for the interaction between gender and educational level and using contrasts that enable gender differences to be estimated for each educational level, including the reference.

    • Additive and subtractive resilience strategies as enablers of biographical reinvention: A qualitative study of ex-smokers and never-smokers

      2011, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      If anything, the evidence is that those who smoke, for example, are even more aware of the risks than those who do not…It is clear that some forms of social environment increase the freedom of individuals to follow the health behaviours that they regard as most desirable, and other forms reduce this freedom” (p. 7). Therefore, growing up in materially deprived neighbourhoods may increase the need for resilience in the face of increased adversity, but the likely assets and capabilities of people in those neighbourhoods to develop resilience may be reduced (Bancroft, Wiltshire, Parry, & Amos, 2003; Harman, Graham, Francis, & Inskip, 2006; Mitchell & Backett-Milburn, 2006; Siahpush et al., 2006; Stead, MacAskill, MacKintosh, Reece, & Eadie, 2001). Rather than taking a victim blaming approach, many studies point to the social, economic and political environments within which people live, as the main drivers for inequitable smoking patterns (Bancroft et al., 2003; Lawlor, Frankel, Shaw, Ebrahim, & Smith, 2003; Stead et al., 2001).

    • Theory driven research designs for explaining behavioural health risk transitions: The case of smoking

      2009, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      While levels of education are important because they are linked to knowledge about and attitudes towards the health consequences of smoking (Pampel, 2005; Christakis and Fowler, 2008), a range of factors including sex, age, perceptions as well as educational attainment, have been found to independently predict smoking careers in a range of countries (Nishi et al., 2005; Nobile, Anfosso, Pavia, & Angelillo, 2000; Youssef, Abou-Khatwa, & Fouad, 2003). The fourth phase of the smoking epidemic – sedimentation of smoking behaviour risk within the most marginal groups – continues to be evident (Giskes et al., 2005; Harman, Graham, Francis, & Inskip, 2006; Jefferis, Power, Graham, & Manor, 2004; Mackenbach, 2006; Pampel, 2007). We would argue that smoking persistence among current cohorts of smokers has been best addressed to this point through the many theories and definitions of addiction promulgated over the last few decades (West, 2001; Keane, 2004).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text