Preeclampsia: Short-term and Long-term Implications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.007Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disease specific to pregnancy with a high risk of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, as well as long-term cardiovascular risks to both the patient and her child.

  • The cause of preeclampsia is not fully understood, but is most likely to be abnormal placentation and release of placental factors that contribute to systemic endothelial function.

  • Risk factor and biochemical/biophysical screening tests are available to approximate the risk of developing

Definition

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disease that is exclusive to pregnancy. It was traditionally defined as the triad of hypertension, proteinuria, and edema occurring after 20 to 24 weeks’ gestation.5 This definition has changed and been refined over the years as its pathology has been unraveled. Increase in systolic blood pressure of 30 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of 15 mm Hg is no longer part of the definition because these criteria are not predictive of adverse outcomes. Edema has also

Epidemiology

Two-thirds of preeclampsia cases occur in otherwise healthy, nulliparous women, so there is no single most important recognizable risk factor.1 However, there is a classic list of conditions that predispose a patient to preeclampsia (Table 2).9, 10

One-third of cases in the United States are associated with obesity.1 Studies have shown a progressive increase in risk of preeclampsia as body mass index (BMI) increases. O’Brien and colleagues11 reported a doubling of preeclampsia risk for every

Pathophysiology

History has afforded many theories as to the cause of preeclampsia.5 In ancient times, an imbalance of fluids, or humors, was thought to be linked to disease. Women were said to be porous and therefore prone to having too much fluid. The so-called wandering womb was thought to uproot itself and therefore cause problems wherever it landed (ie, the liver, spleen, or lungs). Restoring balance with lactation, menstruation, or bloodletting was the treatment of choice.

Although not formally defined in

Screening

Ideally, there would be a simple, accurate, low-cost test to predict who will develop preeclampsia so that an effective intervention can be initiated to improve maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes. Such a test has become something of a holy grail in obstetric research. However, all the screening tests in the world do not change the fact that the only proven intervention remains delivery. Proponents of the screening test suggest that improved antepartum surveillance, administration of antenatal

Diagnosis

Preeclampsia is diagnosed by new-onset hypertension (≥140 mm Hg systolic or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic) with proteinuria after 20 weeks’ gestation in a previously normotensive woman. Guidelines for accurate diagnosis include:

  • Appropriate maternal positioning for blood pressure assessment (seated, resting for 5 minutes, legs not crossed, not talking)

  • Persistence of the increased blood pressure (it is recommended that a single increased measurement be repeated to confirm that it is not isolated)

In 2013,

Management

The ultimate management of preeclampsia (delivery) is primarily determined by 2 things: gestational age and the presence of severe features.4 For patients who are term (≥37 weeks’ gestation) at diagnosis, the recommendation is delivery. For patients with severe features, the recommendation is delivery if greater than or equal to 34 weeks’ gestation. Expectant management is appropriate for certain patients if the patient is willing to undergo the risks of staying pregnant.

Long-term risks

Cardiovascular disease is the number 1 cause of mortality in the United States.34 Women with a history of preeclampsia have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease later in life, particularly if they have a history of early-onset, severe, or recurrent preeclampsia.35 Gestational age at onset seems to be more significant than severity of disease, because patients in the early-onset group have the highest risk. Overall, preeclampsia leads to a 4-fold increase in risk for chronic hypertension

Recurrence risk

Recurrence rates of preeclampsia range widely, from 15% to 65%, likely because of the heterogeneity of the patient populations studied.37, 38, 39, 40 Women with severe preeclampsia in the second trimester are at increased risk of repeat preeclampsia, recurrence in the second trimester, chronic hypertension, and morbidity and mortality.37 The recurrence risk in women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia has been shown to be related to chronic hypertension but not severity of the symptoms

Summary

Preeclampsia has threatened gravid patients and challenged the medical community since ancient times. Clinicians currently have a reasonable understanding of how to stratify patients based on risk of the disease or its recurrence as well as clear-cut guidelines for diagnosis. However, there are limited measures to offer in the way of prevention, and the fundamental cure beyond delivery continues to be elusive. Management of preeclampsia remains a challenge, because continuation of pregnancy for

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (40)

  • R. Ahmed et al.

    Pre-eclampsia and future cardiovascular risk among women: a review

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2014)
  • B.M. Sibai et al.

    Severe preeclampsia in the second trimester: recurrence risk and long-term prognosis

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1991)
  • B.B. van Rijn et al.

    Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy after first pregnancy with early-onset preeclampsia

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2006)
  • K. Bramham et al.

    Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with previous preeclampsia: a prospective study

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2011)
  • D. Mostello et al.

    Recurrence of preeclampsia: effects of gestational age at delivery of the first pregnancy, body mass index, paternity, and interval between births

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2008)
  • R.K. Creasy

    Creasy and Resnik’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice: Expert Consult Premium Edition. 7th edition

    (2013)
  • C.V. Ananth et al.

    Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis

    BMJ

    (2013)
  • A.B. Wallis et al.

    Secular trends in the rates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and gestational hypertension, United States, 1987-2004

    Am J Hypertens

    (2008)
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists et al.

    Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2013)
  • L. Velauthar et al.

    First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55 974 women

    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

    (2014)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Placental morphology and the prediction of underlying cardiovascular risk factors

      2021, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    • Aortic intima-media thickness in neonates exposed to early-onset preeclampsia

      2020, Early Human Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      The late-onset form is attributed to maternal predisposition to hypertension and is usually associated with normal placenta [1,2]. Conversely, early-onset preeclampsia is characterized by early placental dysfunction, thus predisposing to more severe gestational complications [1–3]. Nevertheless, the explanation of aortic intima-media thickening in neonates exposed to early-onset preeclampsia remains unclear.

    • Evaluation of angiogenic factors in the decision to admit women with suspected preeclampsia

      2020, Pregnancy Hypertension
      Citation Excerpt :

      Preeclampsia is estimated to complicate 2–8% of pregnancies, with the incidence rising in the United States [1]. Preeclampsia with severe features (sPE) can lead to significant adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, including preterm delivery, abruption, stroke, liver rupture, eclamptic seizure, and renal failure [2,3]. Diagnosis of preeclampsia is currently reliant on clinical criteria such as new onset hypertension and proteinuria, which has been shown to have a poor positive predictive value [4].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosures: None.

    View full text