Original contribution
Concussive Symptoms in Emergency Department Patients Diagnosed with Minor Head Injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.08.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based protocols exist for Emergency Department (ED) patients diagnosed with minor head injury. These protocols focus on the need for acute intervention or in-hospital management. The frequency and nature of concussive symptoms experienced by patients discharged from the ED are not well understood. Objectives: To examine the prevalence and nature of concussive symptoms, up to 1 month post-presentation, among ED patients diagnosed with minor head injury. Methods: Eligible and consenting patients presenting to Kingston EDs with minor head injury (n = 94) were recruited for study. The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire was administered at baseline and at 1 month post-injury to assess concussive symptoms. This analysis focused upon acute and ongoing symptoms. Results: Proportions of patients reporting concussive symptoms were 68/94 (72%) at baseline and 59/94 (63%) at follow-up. Seventeen percent of patients (18/102) were investigated with computed tomography scanning during their ED encounter. The prevalence of somatic symptoms declined between baseline and follow-up, whereas some cognitive and emotional symptoms persisted. Conclusion: The majority of patients who present to the ED with minor head injuries suffer from concussive symptoms that do not resolve quickly. This information should be incorporated into discharge planning for these patients.

Introduction

Patients with minor head injury commonly present to the Emergency Department (ED). Minor head injuries are common in all age groups, accounting for 85% of all brain injuries (1). These injuries are debilitating and costly to the victims and to the medical care system (2, 3).

Clinical management of minor head injuries in the ED has been the subject of recent study (4). Efforts to improve ED treatment protocols for the head-injured patient include formulation of clinical decision rules to identify patients who require imaging, hospitalization, or neurosurgical intervention (5). In addition, consensus-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of minor head injuries in the ED have been developed (6). These initiatives focus on acute medical diagnosis, emergency treatment, and evidence-based decisions surrounding patient disposition (4, 5, 6). However, after acute and life-threatening events are ruled out, patients are often discharged without specific plans for follow-up care (4, 5, 6). Little is known about the disabling effects of minor head injuries seen in EDs beyond the acute medical encounter.

Epidemiological and neuropsychological studies suggest the persistence of a range of concussive symptoms in the weeks and months after minor head injury, including cognitive, physical, and emotional or behavioral effects (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). This evidence comes from the concussion literature and has been observed in patients in other clinical settings (e.g., sports medicine, neurology) (14, 15). In Canada, the annual incidence of patients who are treated in a hospital or clinic for minor head injury each year is 150 per 100,000 population (16). Similar annual rates have been reported for the United States (130 per 100,000), the United Kingdom (200–300 per 100,000), and for multiple countries by the World Health Organization (100–300 per 100,000, with higher rates among teenagers and adults) (16, 17, 18, 19, 20). The prevalence of reported post-concussive symptoms ranges from 34% to 84% in studies that followed patients for 3 months to 1 year (21, 22). Few clinical studies have investigated the frequency and severity of post-concussive symptoms in general populations of ED patients.

In this study, we prospectively followed a series of patients diagnosed with minor head injury who presented to the general EDs in Kingston, Ontario. Our objective was to describe the prevalence and patterns of concussive symptoms reported up to 1 month post-presentation.

Section snippets

Clinical Setting

The study population consisted of consecutive patients diagnosed with minor head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 15) presenting to either of the two EDs serving the city of Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Minor head injury was defined conceptually as any acute traumatic head injury with a transient loss of brain function (see operational definition below). Patients were enrolled at the Kingston General Hospital or Hotel Dieu Hospital between October 2005 and April 2006. Both are large,

Sample

There were 163 potential subjects identified during the recruitment period. Forty-one could not be contacted within 72 h, 8 had untraceable telephone numbers or addresses, 2 had language barriers that limited communication, and 10 refused participation. A total of 102 participants completed the baseline interview; of these, 8 were lost to follow-up at the second interview, leaving a total of 94 completed patient files. Table 1 describes demographic and injury-related characteristics of these

Discussion

The major finding from this prospective case series is that large proportions of patients discharged from EDs with a diagnosis of minor head injury continued to experience a range of concussive symptoms at 1 month post-injury. Most of these patients were discharged from the ED with no referral for follow-up care. Somatic symptoms of headache, fatigue, and dizziness were highest in frequency, and other types of cognitive and emotional symptoms persisted. Minor head injury, therefore, should be

Conclusion

This prospective case series demonstrates that most patients who present to the ED with minor head injury suffer from a range of concussive symptoms that do not resolve quickly. This fact may not be widely recognized by health care professionals who provide acute care to these patients. The high likelihood of ongoing concussive symptoms should be incorporated into discharge planning and instructions for these patients.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kathy Bowes and Fenni Loye of the Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University for data collection efforts.

References (30)

  • L. Chamelian et al.

    Six-month recovery from mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: the role of the APOE-e4 allele

    Brain

    (2004)
  • A. Feinstein et al.

    Mild traumatic brain injury: the silent epidemic

    Can J Public Health

    (2000)
  • E. Finkelstein et al.

    The incidence and economic burden of injuries in the United States

    (2006)
  • J.J. Bazarian et al.

    Emergency department management of mild traumatic brain injury in the USA

    Emerg Med J

    (2005)
  • I.G. Stiell et al.

    Canadian CT head rule study for patients with minor head injury: methodology for phase II (validation and economic analysis)

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2001)
  • P. Peloso et al.

    Critical evaluation of the existing guidelines on mild traumatic brain injury

    J Rehabil Med

    (2004)
  • C.A. Hawley et al.

    Outcomes following childhood head injury: a population study

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • H.S. Levin et al.

    Neurobehavioral outcome following minor head injury: a three-center study

    J Neurosurg

    (1987)
  • S. Dikmen et al.

    Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences of minor head injury

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1986)
  • J. Ponsford et al.

    Cognitive and behavioral outcome following mild traumatic head injury in children

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1999)
  • P.E. Bijur et al.

    Cognitive outcomes of multiple mild head injuries in children

    J Dev Behav Pediatr

    (1996)
  • P.E. Bijur et al.

    Cognitive, behavioral, and motoric sequelae of mild head injury in a national birth cohort

  • J.E. Riggs

    Delayed diffuse neurodegeneration after cerebral concussion

    Mil Med

    (2001)
  • C.A. Asplund et al.

    Sport-related concussion: factors associated with prolonged return to play

    Clin J Sports Med

    (2004)
  • P.M. Rees

    Contemporary issues in mild traumatic brain injury

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (2003)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Recommendations for the Emergency Department Prevention of Sport-Related Concussion

      2020, Annals of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      If the sport-related concussion patient has already experienced concussions, the emergency physician should introduce the idea that continued exposure to head impacts might be dangerous for long-term neurologic health. Multiple studies have demonstrated variability or inadequacy of ED discharge instructions for patients with concussion,91-96 as well as poor compliance with recommendations.97,98 Discharge instructions have been shown to be maximally effective when they provide educational material about expected postconcussion symptoms, guidelines for return to activity, time-frame for follow-up, and recommendations for when to seek specialist care.96

    • Neurosensory diagnostic techniques for mild traumatic brain injury

      2019, Neurosensory Disorders in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    • A population-based study of sport and recreation-related head injuries treated in a Canadian health region

      2012, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      This proportion is higher than that reported by a previous study in the same health region where 24% of HIs were due to SR-activities7; however, the present study included more severe HIs (i.e., haemorrhage). Other studies, which have limited inclusion to school aged children15 and minor head injuries16 have reported that 32% and 42% of HIs are due to SR-activities, respectively; however, direct comparisons between these studies are cautioned due to different inclusion criteria. A small number of SR-activities (e.g., hockey, cycling, skiing/snowboarding/sledding, soccer, and football) accounted for 59% of the SR-HIs treated in EDs.

    • Risk of suicide after a concussion

      2016, CMAJ
      Citation Excerpt :

      We distinguished each case as a weekend concussion (midnight Friday to midnight Sunday) or a weekday concussion (remaining 5 days and nights of the week).50 Differentiating a weekend from a weekday concussion was based on the date of medical care, which closely corresponds to the date of injury.51,52 For patients with multiple concussions, we used the date of the first concussion, such that each person was counted once in the analyses; repeat concussions were tracked for separate secondary analyses.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by the Canadian Hospital Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (RJ Brison, Kingston medical director) funded by the Child Injury Section of the Public Health Agency of Canada; and the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (Grant # 2003-PREV-MS-03).

    View full text