Original article
A randomized double-blind trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for pemphigus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.09.052Get rights and content

Background

Pemphigus is a rare life-threatening intractable autoimmune blistering disease caused by IgG autoantibodies to desmogleins. It has been difficult to conduct a double-blind clinical study for pemphigus partly because, in a placebo group, appropriate treatment often must be provided when the disease flares.

Objective

A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted to investigate the therapeutic effect of a single cycle of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (400, 200, or 0 mg/kg/d) administered over 5 consecutive days in patients relatively resistant to systemic steroids.

Methods

We evaluated efficacy with time to escape from the protocol as a novel primary end point, and pemphigus activity score, antidesmoglein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay scores, and safety as secondary end points.

Results

We enrolled 61 patients with pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceus who did not respond to prednisolone (≥20 mg/d). Time to escape from the protocol was significantly prolonged in the 400-mg group compared with the placebo group (P < .001), and a dose-response relationship among the 3 treatment groups was observed (P < .001). Disease activity and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay scores were significantly lower in the 400-mg group than in the other groups (P < .05 on day 43, P < .01 on day 85). There was no significant difference in the safety end point among the 3 treatment groups.

Limitation

Prednisolone at 20 mg/d or more may not be high enough to define steroid resistance.

Conclusion

Intravenous immunoglobulin (400 mg/kg/d for 5 d) in a single cycle is an effective and safe treatment for patients with pemphigus who are relatively resistant to systemic steroids. Time to escape from the protocol is a useful indicator for evaluation in randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies of rare and serious diseases.

Section snippets

Patients

This study was conducted in 27 medical institutions in Japan with affiliated dermatologists specialized in autoimmune blistering disease. Patients were given the diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) or pemphigus foliaceus (PF) as confirmed based on our national diagnostic criteria as follows: pemphigus was diagnosed when at least one item from every 3 findings, or two items from clinical findings and one item from immunologic findings were satisfied.

  • 1.

    Clinical findings

    • Multiple, easily rupturing,

Disposition of patients

The disposition of patients enrolled in the study is shown in Fig 1. A total of 61 patients were treated with the investigational drug (placebo, 20; 200 mg, 20; and 400 mg, 21). All the enrolled patients including 10 patients (placebo, 5; 200 mg, 3; and 400 mg, 2) who were withdrawn from the study according to the requirements in the protocol were included in the analyses. The main reasons for study withdrawal were the evaluator's decision to withdraw the patient and the occurrence of adverse

Discussion

Most clinical research involving a rare disease is based on case reports or data from limited samples obtained in open-label studies. In particular, in life-threatening, serious, and intractable diseases, such as pemphigus, appropriate treatment must be provided in a timely fashion if symptoms are aggravated or unchanged for days. This makes performance of a placebo-controlled, double-blind comparison study infeasible. On the other hand, the efficacy of new drugs for malignant tumors or for

References (24)

  • Amagai M. Pemphigus. In: Dermatology. 2nd ed. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, Callen JP, Horn TD, Mancini AJ, et...
  • G. Tappeiner et al.

    High-dosage intravenous gamma globulin: therapeutic failure in pemphigus and pemphigoid

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (1989)
  • H.M. Gürcan et al.

    Frequency of adverse events associated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with pemphigus or pemphigoid

    Ann Pharmacother

    (2007)
  • S. Segura et al.

    High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins for the treatment of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases: evaluation of its use in 19 cases

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2007)
  • A.R. Ahmed et al.

    Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with rituximab and intravenous immune globulin

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • N. Sami et al.

    Corticosteroid-sparing effect of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with pemphigus vulgaris

    Arch Dermatol

    (2002)
  • J.C. Bystryn et al.

    Treatment of pemphigus with intravenous immunoglobulin

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2002)
  • A.R. Ahmed

    Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in the treatment of patients with pemphigus vulgaris unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive treatment

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2001)
  • I. Shimanovich et al.

    Treatment of severe pemphigus with protein A immunoadsorption, rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulins

    Br J Dermatol

    (2008)
  • S. Ikeda et al.

    History of the establishment and revision of diagnostic criteria, severity index and therapeutic guidelines for pemphigus in Japan

    Arch Dermatol Res

    (2003)
  • K.E. Harman et al.

    Guidelines for the management of pemphigus vulgaris

    Br J Dermatol

    (2003)
  • A.R. Ahmed

    Consensus statement on the use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in the treatment of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases

    Arch Dermatol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (219)

    • Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy

      2022, Encyclopedia of Infection and Immunity
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Other investigators in the Pemphigus Study Group are listed in the Appendix.

    Supported by Nihon Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, but no financial support was provided to any individual investigator for performing this trial.

    Disclosure: Drs Amagai, Ikeda, Kitajima, Nishikawa, and Hashimoto report receiving consulting and lecture fees from Nihon Pharmaceutical Co Ltd. Drs Shimizu, Iizuka, Hanada, Aiba, Kaneko, Izaki, Tamaki, Ikezawa, Takigawa, Seishima, Tanaka, Miyachi, Katayama, Horiguchi, Miyagawa, Furukawa, Iwatsuki, Hide, Tokura, Furue, Ihn, Fujiwara, Ogawa, and Hashimoto have no conflicts of interest to declare.

    Presented in part at the Post International Investigative Dermatology Satellite International Meeting on Autoimmune Bullous Diseases at Ohtsu, Japan on May 19, 2008 and the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Dermatological Association at Kyoto, Japan on April 20, 2008.

    View full text