European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?
Introduction
Anal incontinence is believed to affect nearly 40,000 mothers annually in the UK [1], [2], [3], [4]. Traumatic vaginal delivery is the major cause of faecal incontinence in women [5], [6], and studies using endo-anal ultrasonography have shown that faecal incontinence is caused by sphincter damage [7], [8]. Episiotomy, as the most commonly performed obstetric operation, has been a routine part of instrumental deliveries with the aim of decreasing the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Two mechanisms of injury are generally recognised: direct disruption of the anal sphincter muscles and traction neuropathy affecting the pudendal nerves [9]. Even in women with overt tears diagnosed and repaired at birth, the outcome is often unfavourable [8], [10], [11]. About 30–50% of these women suffer from chronic anal incontinence, dyspareunia, faecal urgency or perineal pain [8], [10], [12], [13]. The reported incidence of third degree tears varies between 0.5% and 6% of vaginal deliveries in centres where mediolateral episiotomy is practised [5], [7], [8], [12], [14], [15], [16].
A first report of episiotomy goes far back to 1741, when Ould described this as surgical opening of the perineum to prevent severe perineal tears [17], but there now appears to be a trend towards a decrease in the use of episiotomy. The objective of this study was to analyse the risk factors of OASI with special reference to the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on OASI.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital in the UK. OASI was defined as any injury to the anal sphincter muscles, with or without a tear involving the anal mucosa. Data for the statistical analysis were obtained from the maternity database at the hospital. This database contains all available information recorded after each delivery. A printed output from this database is used in case notes as a record of delivery. The existing hospital
Results
All caesarean sections, non-vertex presentations and incomplete data were excluded from the study, resulting in a study population of 10,314 deliveries. Descriptive statistics for the subjects are shown in Table 1, and statistics for the birth are shown in Table 2. 1666 subjects (16.2%) had an episiotomy. 332 of 10,314 subjects (3.2%) had third and fourth degree perineal tears. 58% of OASI were sustained after normal vaginal delivery (NVD), 22% after forceps delivery and 20% after ventouse
Conflict of interests
None to declare.
Funding
None to declare.
Acknowledgement
We thank Alice Walmesley of Dianthus Medical Limited for editing assistance.
References (32)
Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence
Lancet
(1994)- et al.
Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth
Lancet
(1984) - et al.
Prospective study of the influence of parity and operative technique on the outcome of primary anal sphincter repair following obstetrical injury
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
(2000) - et al.
Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery
BJOG
(2001) - et al.
Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair
Obstet Gynecol
(1999) - et al.
A comparison of “hands off” versus “hands on” techniques for decreasing perineal lacerations during birth
J Midwifery Womens Health
(2006) - et al.
Achieving sustainable quality in maternity services—using audit of incontinence and dyspareunia to identify shortfalls in meeting standards
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
(2001) - et al.
Faecal incontinence after childbirth
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
(1997) - et al.
Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
(1995) Sexual function after childbirth: women's experiences, persistent morbidity and lack of professional recognition
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
(1997)
Incidence of third-degree perineal tears in labour and outcome after primary repair
Br J Surg
Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair
BMJ
Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair
Br J Surg
Anal endosonographic findings in the follow-up of primarily sutured sphincteric ruptures
Br J Surg
Objective methods cannot predict anal incontinence after primary repair of extensive anal tears
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Cited by (73)
Language barrier as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury – A case-control study
2021, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human ReproductionCitation Excerpt :The risk of sphincter injury related to spatulas, which are often used in France, does not seem to be higher than a forceps delivery and not less than a ventouse delivery [43–45]. Fetal birth weight is a risk factor for grade 3 perineal tear [46,47], especially if the fetal birth weight exceeds 4000 g (OR between 1.86 and 3.01) [33,34,38]. Correlated variables such as a head circumference greater than 35 cm [21], shoulder dystocia [37,38,47], gestational age at delivery [21,48] or diabetes [21,34] are also reported as risk factors.
The use of Episcissors-60 to reduce the rate of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A systematic review
2019, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyLésions obstétricales du sphincter anal (LOSA) : Prévention, identification et réparation
2016, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaEpisiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: A population-based retrospective cohort study
2019, CMAJCitation Excerpt :The 2017 Cochrane review22 that combined data from 12 randomized controlled trials examining episiotomy among vaginal deliveries included only 1 trial of women with operative vaginal delivery, and it was underpowered to detect any difference in obstetric anal sphincter injury.33 Several previous observational studies have shown a protective association between mediolateral episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury among operative vaginal deliveries, similar to our findings.7,19,34-41 However, other studies have contradicted these results42,43 or found no association.33,44,45